Keep track of deleted cell for reorder change request #12575
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MichaReiser
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
|
Uh that's a nasty bug. Nice find! |
dhruvmanila
force-pushed
the
dhruv/deleted-cell-content
branch
from
0efeac2
to
c0e9fbd
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR fixes a bug where the server wouldn't retain the cell content in case of a reorder change request.
As mentioned in #12573 (comment), this change request is modeled as (a) remove these cell URIs and (b) add these cell URIs. The cell content isn't provided. But, the way we've modeled the
NotebookCell(it contains the underlyingTextDocument), we need to keep track of the deleted cells to get the content.This is not an ideal solution and a better long term solution would be to model it as per the spec but that is a big structural change and will affect multiple parts of the server. Modeling as per the spec would also avoid bugs like #11864. For context, that model would add complexity per #11206 (comment).
fixes: #12573
Test Plan
This video shows the before and after the bug is fixed:
Screen.Recording.2024-07-30.at.15.09.11.mov