[`pycodestyle`] Add blank line(s) rules (`E301`, `E302`, `E303`, `E304`, `E305`, `E306`) #8720

hoel-bagard · 2023-11-16T13:54:54Z

Summary

This PR is part of #2402, it adds the E301, E302, E303, E304, E305, E306 error rules along with their fixes.

A first attempt at implementing E305 using physical lines was done here, and a second attempt using logical lines here. This version uses the fact that comment only lines are now counted as logical lines.

Test Plan

The test fixture uses the one from pycodestyle with a few added tests.

github-actions · 2023-11-16T15:01:34Z

`ruff-ecosystem` results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+3911 -26 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 15 projects; 26 projects unchanged)

DisnakeDev/disnake (+2 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ disnake/utils.py:1051:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ examples/basic_voice.py:96:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0

RasaHQ/rasa (+13 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ data/test_classes/nlu_component_skeleton.py:11:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ rasa/core/agent.py:117:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ rasa/core/channels/console.py:144:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ rasa/core/channels/console.py:218:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ rasa/core/channels/rasa_chat.py:46:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ rasa/server.py:579:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ scripts/evaluate_release_tag.py:41:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ stubs/aio_pika/robust_channel.pyi:10:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ stubs/sanic.pyi:23:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ stubs/sanic.pyi:25:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
... 3 additional changes omitted for project

apache/airflow (+32 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview --select ALL

+ airflow/compat/functools.pyi:27:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ airflow/decorators/__init__.pyi:158:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ airflow/decorators/__init__.pyi:314:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ airflow/decorators/__init__.pyi:61:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ airflow/decorators/__init__.pyi:642:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ airflow/jobs/triggerer_job_runner.py:601:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py:455:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py:476:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py:582:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py:619:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
... 22 additional changes omitted for project

aws/aws-sam-cli (+114 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/Provided/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/custom_root_dir/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/custom_root_dir_and_custom_makefile/custom_src_code/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/custom_root_dir_custom_makefile_and_custom_working_dir/working_dir/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/custom_working_dir_src_code/working_dir/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ tests/integration/testdata/buildcmd/provided_src_code_without_makefile/main.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
... 108 additional changes omitted for rule E302
+ tests/integration/testdata/start_api/lambda_authorizers/app.py:159:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
... 107 additional changes omitted for project

bokeh/bokeh (+3208 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview --select ALL

+ docs/bokeh/source/conf.py:230:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:102:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:13:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:16:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:21:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:34:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/gears/gears.py:62:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/parallel_plot/parallel_plot.py:109:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/advanced/extensions/putting_together.py:85:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ examples/advanced/extensions/putting_together.py:93:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/advanced/extensions/tool.py:74:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
... 2390 additional changes omitted for rule E302
+ examples/advanced/extensions/tool.py:78:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/advanced/extensions/widget.py:52:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ examples/basic/annotations/colorbar_log.py:19:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
... 313 additional changes omitted for rule E305
+ examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:34:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:43:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ release/deploy.py:55:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/client/states.py:110:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ src/bokeh/document/events.py:234:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ src/bokeh/document/events.py:518:9: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ src/bokeh/driving.py:114:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/driving.py:170:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/driving.py:189:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/driving.py:91:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/embed/__init__.py:54:1: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (3)
+ src/bokeh/layouts.py:323:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ src/bokeh/layouts.py:427:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
... 185 additional changes omitted for rule E306
+ src/bokeh/model/model.py:552:13: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ src/bokeh/model/model.py:72:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ src/bokeh/models/plots.py:907:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ src/bokeh/models/ui/dialogs.py:58:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ src/bokeh/models/widgets/tables.py:154:1: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (3)
... 36 additional changes omitted for rule E303
+ src/bokeh/server/server.py:283:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ src/bokeh/server/session.py:231:9: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ src/typings/selenium/webdriver/common/action_chains.pyi:10:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
... 253 additional changes omitted for rule E301
+ tests/unit/bokeh/server/test_server__server.py:469:1: E304 [*] blank lines found after function decorator
... 3172 additional changes omitted for project

commaai/openpilot (+394 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ common/api/__init__.py:10:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ common/conversions.py:3:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ common/ffi_wrapper.py:14:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ common/ffi_wrapper.py:8:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ common/file_helpers.py:74:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ common/gpio.py:12:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
... 305 additional changes omitted for rule E302
+ common/kalman/tests/test_simple_kalman.py:86:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ common/logging_extra.py:216:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (1)
+ common/transformations/camera.py:73:1: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (3)
+ common/transformations/model.py:14:1: E305 [*] expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found (0)
... 384 additional changes omitted for project

freedomofpress/securedrop (+2 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ molecule/testinfra/app/test_tor_hidden_services.py:11:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ redwood/redwood/__init__.pyi:6:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1

fronzbot/blinkpy (+6 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ blinkpy/blinkpy.py:422:17: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ blinkpy/camera.py:415:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ blinksync/forms.py:56:5: E301 [*] Expected 1 blank line, found 0
+ blinksync/forms.py:71:5: E303 [*] Too many blank lines (2)
+ blinksync/forms.py:77:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
+ blinksync/forms.py:9:1: E302 [*] Expected 2 blank lines, found 1

lnbits/lnbits (+27 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

+ lnbits/commands.py:498:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/commands.py:512:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/commands.py:547:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:294:9: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:325:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:347:13: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:389:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:424:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:488:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
+ lnbits/core/services.py:574:5: E306 [*] Expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0
... 17 additional changes omitted for project

... Truncated remaining completed projected reports due to GitHub comment length restrictions

Changes by rule (7 rules affected)

code	total	+ violation	- violation
E302	2887	2887	0
E305	388	388	0
E301	270	270	0
E306	265	265	0
E303	74	74	0
PLR0917	52	26	26
E304	1	1	0

Formatter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Formatter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

decorator -> comment -> decorator was causing a false positive.

Fix false positive where a method following an if (or other indentation inducing keyword) would trigger E301.

This also move the trigger on an async def from the def to the async.

Make the comment stick to the following line instead of the preceding one.

allisonkarlitskaya · 2023-11-21T14:37:02Z

With PyCQA/pycodestyle#1215 merged, the "top-levelness instead of class/def" approach now seems indisputably correct.

cf PyCQA/pycodestyle#1216

MichaReiser

Thanks for working on this (again).

I left a few comments on how I think the state could be simplified which should make it easier to reason about and review the code changes.

I still feel somewhat uncomfortable to integrate this into logical lines. Are there examples where it is important that the rule runs on logical lines? If so, then using logical lines is the right thing to do. If not, then it might be overkill and it might be easier to just copy over of what's needed from LogicalLine into a BlankLine checker.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pycodestyle/rules/logical_lines/blank_lines.rs

MichaReiser · 2023-11-28T03:37:23Z

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pycodestyle/rules/logical_lines/blank_lines.rs

+                    Diagnostic::new(TooManyBlankLines(line.line.blank_lines), token.range);
+
+                let chars_to_remove = if indent_level > 0 {
+                    line.line.preceding_blank_characters - BlankLinesConfig::METHOD


Would it be possible to compute the blank lines ad-hoc? Storing them for every line seems expensive, especially because they're only needed for fixes.

There isn't a way to go back to previous logical lines, right ?
Then the only option (afaik) would be to work with text and to go back until finding the end of the previous non-blank line. My understanding is that it would be slow, however if that is run only for fixes, then maybe it's fine.

…ve Default.

MichaReiser · 2023-11-28T04:52:44Z

I guess I need to get a better understanding when this rule is supposed to run. What I'm wondering is if it is sufficient to only test for empty lines after each Newline (which indicates a new logical line) and use Indent and Dedent to detect the end of a class / function. If that happens to be sufficient, it might be easier to implement it without using logical lines. If there are cases where this is not sufficient, than using logical lines is the right choice.

hoel-bagard · 2023-11-28T06:00:35Z

Thank you for your review.

I don't know if using logical lines is required. I was under the impression that I could only use physical or logical lines, and with physical lines ruled out there was only logical lines left. As long as it's possible to check for indents/detents, def/async def, class and decorator tokens, I suppose it might be possible to not use logical lines.
I don't have a good idea of what the alternative would be, so it's a bit hard to say.

…lank_lines.rs Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>

With BlankLinesChecker containing the method doing the checking.

MichaReiser · 2023-12-01T02:11:41Z

The alternative is that you create a function similar to check_logical_lines that accepts all tokens. It would be interesting to understand if doing so would require duplicating a lot of logic (in which case it isn't worth it) or if it may even be simpler because you don't need to make it fit into the logical lines structure.

Do you want to play around with it to see how it feels? Feel free to publish it as a separate (or stacked) PR. I don't want that you have to undo the work if logical lines was the right place to begin with.

See

ruff/crates/ruff_linter/src/checkers/logical_lines.rs

Lines 33 to 38 in c38617f

    
           pub(crate) fn check_logical_lines( 
        
               tokens: &[LexResult], 
        
               locator: &Locator, 
        
               stylist: &Stylist, 
        
               settings: &LinterSettings, 
        
           ) -> Vec<Diagnostic> {

hoel-bagard · 2023-12-02T11:46:18Z

Would the main goal be to not store the number of preceding blank lines/characters for each line ?

MichaReiser · 2023-12-04T03:45:54Z

Would the main goal be to not store the number of preceding blank lines/characters for each line ?

The main goal is to understand if the rules fit into the logical lines or not. To me, it seems they don't really re-use the logic of logical lines, but it adds complexity to the logical line data structures (making it harder to understand and maintain). Meaning, the overall implementation may be more complicated than it has to. It also has the downside that running the logical line rules only (excluding blank lines) now pays for some of the blank line's runtime cost without using it. .

hoel-bagard · 2023-12-10T12:17:06Z

Ok, I'll try to make the change.

minusf · 2023-12-13T16:26:55Z

very happy to see E303 coming, thank you all! my ocd will thank you <3

Avasam · 2023-12-14T07:47:37Z

As a note, autofixes for all these rules would cover E3 fixes of Autopep8

hoel-bagard · 2023-12-16T08:03:31Z

@MichaReiser I've made a version that does not use logical lines here.

Overall I feel like the added logic isn't too complex, especially since it removes some functions from the logical lines version. I still need to operate on logical lines (since pycodestyle did), so I'm still building them, but I only keep track of what I actually need.

codspeed-hq · 2023-12-16T08:11:16Z

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8720 will not alter performance

_{Comparing hoel-bagard:add_blank_lines_E30_V2 (29849d5) with main (0029b4f)}

Summary

✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

hoel-bagard and others added 16 commits November 10, 2023 00:36

Add V1 version.

32ec9e7

Keep track of previous streak of blank lines to fix 301.

624c7a5

Fix 302.

cd02e11

Fix 305.

f9a19ef

Fix 306.

a10bea3

Fix 303 regression.

f57b614

Add snapshots.

42c6f12

Update nursery rules list

2283019

Add a non-error test and its corresponding fix.

06618c2

Add a TODO comment.

09b6ba1

Update snapshots following 06618c2.

1bdd181

Clippy fixes.

2a7b4cb

Store line.is_comment_only()'s result in a variable. Use config more.

aa7b6e6

Do not ignore first logical line when it comes to tracked vars.

8d3744d

Merge branch 'astral-sh:main' into add_blank_lines_E30_V2

d670100

Remove unnecessary check.

bd282ec

hoel-bagard mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2023

[pycodestyle] Add blank line(s) rules (E301, E302, E303, E304, E305, E306) #4694

Closed

Update snapshots (Fix -> Safe fix)

2ef4d02

hoel-bagard added 2 commits November 17, 2023 00:24

Fix first logical line issue.

36d2547

Fix false positive caused by a class's docstring.

0f61011

hoel-bagard marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2023 15:44

hoel-bagard added 3 commits November 17, 2023 00:53

Only trigger E302 on non-indented classes/functions.

0e9ca4e

Fix decorator linked false positive.

3f6f207

decorator -> comment -> decorator was causing a false positive.

Fix E301 false positive.

b667c5c

Fix false positive where a method following an if (or other indentation inducing keyword) would trigger E301.

charliermarsh added the rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule label Nov 17, 2023

Fix decorator + async false positive.

0bf4c45

This also move the trigger on an async def from the def to the async.

hoel-bagard force-pushed the add_blank_lines_E30_V2 branch from 14b784c to 0bf4c45 Compare November 18, 2023 08:55

hoel-bagard added 2 commits November 18, 2023 19:41

Fix E302 error message.

7de1e05

Improve E302's fix interaction with comments.

0c1450a

Make the comment stick to the following line instead of the preceding one.

hoel-bagard added 2 commits November 21, 2023 23:48

Remove unnecessary clone derive.

9b15d8c

Update E306

fd65c70

cf PyCQA/pycodestyle#1216

hoel-bagard force-pushed the add_blank_lines_E30_V2 branch from 21bd298 to fd65c70 Compare November 24, 2023 10:22

MichaReiser reviewed Nov 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

hoel-bagard added 2 commits November 28, 2023 12:55

is_first_logical_line -> is_not_first_logical_line to be able to deri…

883818b

…ve Default.

Remove BlankLinesConfig struct and use module level constants instead.

29f0e6b

hoel-bagard added 2 commits November 28, 2023 15:24

Use an enum to keep track of class and fn status.

0b6bfdf

Remove for loop, clippy fixes.

304115a

hoel-bagard force-pushed the add_blank_lines_E30_V2 branch from e335a5e to 304115a Compare November 28, 2023 07:06

hoel-bagard and others added 4 commits November 28, 2023 16:09

Remove unnecessary Option from is_docstring.

083f4f5

Use an enum to keep track of what the line is following.

60311c3

Update crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pycodestyle/rules/logical_lines/b…

dc2fe49

…lank_lines.rs Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>

BlankLinesTrackingVars -> BlankLinesChecker

727a17b

With BlankLinesChecker containing the method doing the checking.

Add test case

cbb6c1b

Merge branch 'astral-sh:main' into add_blank_lines_E30_V2

29849d5

hoel-bagard mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2023

[pycodestyle] Add blank line(s) rules (E301, E302, E303, E304, E305, E306) #9266

Merged

hoel-bagard marked this pull request as draft December 25, 2023 00:17

hoel-bagard closed this Feb 18, 2024

dfrtz mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2024

[E301] Failing to catch blank lines above classmethods when compared to pycodestyle #10114

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[`pycodestyle`] Add blank line(s) rules (`E301`, `E302`, `E303`, `E304`, `E305`, `E306`) #8720

[`pycodestyle`] Add blank line(s) rules (`E301`, `E302`, `E303`, `E304`, `E305`, `E306`) #8720

hoel-bagard commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

allisonkarlitskaya commented Nov 21, 2023

MichaReiser left a comment

MichaReiser Nov 28, 2023

hoel-bagard Nov 28, 2023

MichaReiser commented Nov 28, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Nov 28, 2023

MichaReiser commented Dec 1, 2023 •

edited

Loading

hoel-bagard commented Dec 2, 2023

MichaReiser commented Dec 4, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Dec 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

minusf commented Dec 13, 2023

Avasam commented Dec 14, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Dec 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

[pycodestyle] Add blank line(s) rules (E301, E302, E303, E304, E305, E306) #8720

[pycodestyle] Add blank line(s) rules (E301, E302, E303, E304, E305, E306) #8720

Conversation

hoel-bagard commented Nov 16, 2023 • edited Loading

Summary

Test Plan

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2023 • edited Loading

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

Linter (preview)

Formatter (stable)

Formatter (preview)

allisonkarlitskaya commented Nov 21, 2023

MichaReiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

MichaReiser Nov 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hoel-bagard Nov 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

MichaReiser commented Nov 28, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Nov 28, 2023

MichaReiser commented Dec 1, 2023 • edited Loading

hoel-bagard commented Dec 2, 2023

MichaReiser commented Dec 4, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Dec 10, 2023 • edited Loading

minusf commented Dec 13, 2023

Avasam commented Dec 14, 2023

hoel-bagard commented Dec 16, 2023 • edited Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 16, 2023 • edited Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8720 will not alter performance

Summary

[`pycodestyle`] Add blank line(s) rules (`E301`, `E302`, `E303`, `E304`, `E305`, `E306`) #8720

[`pycodestyle`] Add blank line(s) rules (`E301`, `E302`, `E303`, `E304`, `E305`, `E306`) #8720

hoel-bagard commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

`ruff-ecosystem` results

MichaReiser commented Dec 1, 2023 •

edited

Loading

hoel-bagard commented Dec 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

hoel-bagard commented Dec 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading