-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Work on 2.5.0 release #830
Comments
Pre-releases of spec are currently not auto-generated due to #834. |
Pre-releases of schemas are currently not auto-generated due to asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#255 and asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#259 |
Pre-release global workflow modification in asyncapi/.github#180 |
Can we add that PR to the list? #840 Thanks! |
ok, another improvement after release that we need is to set branch protection on the release branches since these are not "stable" in the way that name doesn't change. This way, we make sure @fmvilas is not able to do a force push on these next time 😆 |
You do realize that I can enable force-push back and then do it again, right? Now seriously, sorry for all the noise 😅 |
AsyncAPI 2.5.0 release - https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/releases/tag/v2.5.0 |
JSON Schemas release - https://github.com/asyncapi/spec-json-schemas/releases/tag/v3.2.0 |
AsyncAPI 2.5.0 has been successfully released. |
Another improvement in the process. The pull request with release notes blog in |
Resuming processing improvements now and incorporating them into https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/blob/master/RELEASE_PROCESS.md |
Social media examples https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/pull/876/files |
Any reason this is still open 🤔 ? |
@char0n can you have a look? |
Release 2.5.0 is scheduled for September 2022
Detailed info:
Assigned release coordinator and person responsible for the 2.5.0 release: @char0n
Kick-off:
Release branches:
Release notes:
Potential work to be included in this version
Accepted
Server.variables
field type #775$ref
field resolution rules #612 (editorial change)$ref
field #779Pending
Discarded
Progress:
Draft release notes
Cleanup tasks after the release
Guildeline how to write release notes
Referencing PRs, issues and commits respectively.
Close pre-release notifications issues on critical repos
Clarification about updating parser-js with pre-releases
Notify code owners of critical repositories about the pre-releases
This item needs to be added to the check list.
Notify community about release branches
The branches are not created at ad-hoc basis anymore. To this step might not be necessary anymore.
Bindings
I've added https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/tree/next-major into a Release branches. We should probably think about using latest JSON Schemas after a new release inside the bindings JSON Schemas as suggested in https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/pull/143/files. This is a candidate for a cleanup task.
Creating release branches
In a light of #734, creating a release branches is no longer necessary. Following TODO items can be removed from the release issue template. I've also took liberty of removing following items from this issue progress tracker:
This is a candidate for a cleanup task.
Updating default branches with release branch name
In a light of #734, updating default branches with release branch name is no longer necessary. Following TODO items can be removed from the release issue template. I've also took liberty of removing following items from this issue progress tracker:
This is a candidate for a cleanup task.
Auto-update
next-spec
branches automaticallyRef asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#249 (review)
This is a candidate for a cleanup task.
Bad link in release process document
There are two things wrong with this. The PRs shouldn't be created in
Draft
mode and the link is invalid. Along with that, other links doesn't work as well as numbering has been probably changed in past which invalidated the link anchors.Step 5 - create pull requests
This step was not clear. I understood it in a way to create a PR from a fork - in order to resolve the conflics.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: