-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to uninstall atuin? #111
Comments
Hi, thanks for giving atuin a try! In your shell config ( What didn't work for you? Any feedback? |
Well, thanks for your reply. I commented that's line and it works. |
Atuin does provide an import command. |
Thanks for pointing this out by the way, we should provide an uninstall command |
Thanks, and sorry I did not notice it...... |
Uninstall should be up to the system package manager! We should provide docs on removing the shell config though, but otherwise it depends how the project was installed |
From https://axo.dev cargo-dist handles building releases far better than we can, and do so for several large projects now. They also have built an auto-updater We will also need to change our install script to use the cargo-dist installer. Once switched to the new installer, we will no longer be using system package managers wherever possible. If the user wishes to use their package manager, and Atuin is maintained there, then they can choose to do so. This way, we can ensure that users are running a known build, can easily uninstall (just delete the atuin dir), easily update, etc. Builds will use our lockfile, and can have their checksum verified. Later, I'd like to introduce build signing. As Axo are focused on release engineering, they will likely have resolved many more issues than we have - libc versions, etc. I'm not particularly happy with our response of "just use your package manager", as many users seem to have difficulty there. It's unclear what our installer has done, as this behaviour varies massively across systems. It's also unclear how some package maintainers may have patched things Uninstall clarity: #111, #372, #640, #1485, #1546, #2049, #1529
From https://axo.dev cargo-dist handles building releases far better than we can, and do so for several large projects now. We will need to change our install script to use the cargo-dist installer. Historically, we have used the system package manager wherever possible. Once switched to the new installer, this will no longer be the case. If the user wishes to use their package manager, and Atuin is maintained there, then they can choose to do so. This way, we can ensure that users are running a known build, can easily uninstall (just delete the atuin dir), easily update, etc. Builds will use our lockfile, and can have their checksum verified. Later, I'd like to introduce build signing. As Axo are focused on release engineering, they will likely have resolved many more issues than we have - libc versions, etc. I'm not particularly happy with our response of "just use your package manager", as many users seem to have difficulty there. It's unclear what our installer has done, as this behaviour varies massively across systems. It's also unclear how some package maintainers may have patched things I'm hoping that some better release tooling will lead to more confidence in the process, and therefore more frequent releases. Uninstall clarity: #111, #372, #640, #1485, #1546, #2049, #1529
From https://axo.dev cargo-dist handles building releases far better than we can, and do so for several large projects now. We will need to change our install script to use the cargo-dist installer. Historically, we have used the system package manager wherever possible. Once switched to the new installer, this will no longer be the case. If the user wishes to use their package manager, and Atuin is maintained there, then they can choose to do so. This way, we can ensure that users are running a known build, can easily uninstall (just delete the atuin dir), easily update, etc. Builds will use our lockfile, and can have their checksum verified. Later, I'd like to introduce build signing. As Axo are focused on release engineering, they will likely have resolved many more issues than we have - libc versions, etc. I'm not particularly happy with our response of "just use your package manager", as many users seem to have difficulty there. It's unclear what our installer has done, as this behaviour varies massively across systems. It's also unclear how some package maintainers may have patched things I'm hoping that some better release tooling will lead to more confidence in the process, and therefore more frequent releases. Uninstall clarity: #111, #372, #640, #1485, #1546, #2049, #1529
* chore: switch to cargo dist for releases From https://axo.dev cargo-dist handles building releases far better than we can, and do so for several large projects now. We will need to change our install script to use the cargo-dist installer. Historically, we have used the system package manager wherever possible. Once switched to the new installer, this will no longer be the case. If the user wishes to use their package manager, and Atuin is maintained there, then they can choose to do so. This way, we can ensure that users are running a known build, can easily uninstall (just delete the atuin dir), easily update, etc. Builds will use our lockfile, and can have their checksum verified. Later, I'd like to introduce build signing. As Axo are focused on release engineering, they will likely have resolved many more issues than we have - libc versions, etc. I'm not particularly happy with our response of "just use your package manager", as many users seem to have difficulty there. It's unclear what our installer has done, as this behaviour varies massively across systems. It's also unclear how some package maintainers may have patched things I'm hoping that some better release tooling will lead to more confidence in the process, and therefore more frequent releases. Uninstall clarity: #111, #372, #640, #1485, #1546, #2049, #1529 * config * add protobuf * test build * use native arm mac * lol * add toolchain * use 1.78, 2vcpu * nix flake update * 1.77
I have installed the Atuin successfully. But it seems not usable for me now. So I want to uninstall it. But I did not find any documents about this........
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: