Remove deprecated kwargs for process_func_args

[hagenw]

When introducing process_func_args in version 0.8.0 beginning of the year we stated that it will be removed in version 1.0.0.

As I think we should release the new version as 1.0.0, this removes it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #55 (0096486) into main (89aa217) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
audinterface/core/segment.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
audinterface/core/utils.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
audinterface/core/feature.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
audinterface/core/process.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
audinterface/core/process_with_context.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

[hagenw]

Note, that in audinterface.Feature I cannot yet remove **kwargs from __init__() as we need it for support of the deprecated unit keyword argument.

[frankenjoe]

Are you sure we should immediately target 1.0.0? Maybe we should release 0.9.0 in between. Also it would be nice to have #54 before we release 1.0.0.

[hagenw]

I guess, you are right. We added a lot of new stuff, so maybe releasing 0.9.0 first makes sense. On the other hand, it is very unlikely that we will break the API anyway.

But I will set this pull request to WIP for now.

[hagenw]

@frankenjoe should we target 1.0.0 as next release or go with 0.10.0?

[frankenjoe]

Maybe we should wait with 1.0.0 until we know what new functionality we will need to support storing features in audformat. At least reading the features file should be supported, but maybe also their creation. Btw: we have not created an issue regarding feature support in audformat yet, will do now and link it here.

[frankenjoe]

audeering/audformat#321

[frankenjoe]

@hagenw if you agree we target 0.10.0 for now, I will prepare an according release as I think we should release the new handling of multi-channel feature extraction as soon as possible.

[hagenw]

Yes, please go ahead with 0.10.0

[hagenw]

I removed WIP as I think we can target version 1.0.0 with the next release?

[frankenjoe]

There's one more issue I'd like to tackle before, see #100. I have already some code that I was using to avoid this problem I can build on. So it will hopefully not take too long. I'll try to prepare a PR soonish.

[hagenw]

Cool, don't worry we don't need to rush with this.

[frankenjoe]

We have solved #100. So from my side, we could now release 1.0.0.

[hagenw]

I agree, I have rebased main and you can go ahead here.