Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edit MistServer license and description #849

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

stronk-dev
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I am one of the maintainers for MistServer. Just wanted to edit the details of our software, as the software has been fully open sourced and un-licensed. Awesome for self hosters who need an enterprise-ready media engine :)

@Ki-er Ki-er added bug Something isn't working, or incorrect reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews labels Sep 5, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@kokomo123 kokomo123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues here. Thanks for the edit and thanks for your contribution!

software/mistserver.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nodiscc nodiscc added the feedback needed Awaiting feedback/changes by the submitter label Sep 6, 2024
@kokomo123 kokomo123 self-requested a review September 6, 2024 18:55
software/mistserver.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: nodiscc <nodiscc@gmail.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@kokomo123 kokomo123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, no issues here! Thank you for your contribution 👍🏻

@nodiscc nodiscc removed reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews feedback needed Awaiting feedback/changes by the submitter labels Sep 24, 2024
@nodiscc nodiscc merged commit e45586d into awesome-selfhosted:master Sep 28, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working, or incorrect
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants