Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: checkstyle formater & linter #1316

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023
Merged

chore: checkstyle formater & linter #1316

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

jeromevdl
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available: #1290

Description of changes:

  • Creation of a checkstyle.xml file (based on google_checks, with custom severities)
  • Applied it to the whole project (looooooots of changes)

Checklist

Breaking change checklist

RFC issue #:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link
Contributor

@msailes msailes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They look like sensible suggestions and the license header is cool

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 69.70% and project coverage change: -0.31% ⚠️

Comparison is base (baa3592) 79.65% compared to head (3578847) 79.35%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1316      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     79.65%   79.35%   -0.31%     
- Complexity      639      641       +2     
============================================
  Files            73       73              
  Lines          2345     2446     +101     
  Branches        253      253              
============================================
+ Hits           1868     1941      +73     
- Misses          397      425      +28     
  Partials         80       80              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
.../cloudformation/AbstractCustomResourceHandler.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...loudformation/CustomResourceResponseException.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mbda/powertools/core/internal/LambdaConstants.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...wertools/core/internal/LambdaHandlerProcessor.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...lambda/powertools/core/internal/SystemWrapper.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mazon/lambda/powertools/idempotency/Constants.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...eptions/IdempotencyAlreadyInProgressException.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../exceptions/IdempotencyConfigurationException.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...eptions/IdempotencyInconsistentStateException.java 50.00% <ø> (ø)
...eptions/IdempotencyItemAlreadyExistsException.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 63 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@scottgerring scottgerring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add something brief in the maintainers guide to this now, because the big maintainers refactor is going to take a bunch of effort and it would be good to capture this requirement quickly now rather than blocking on that.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 26, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 24 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

@scottgerring scottgerring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@scottgerring scottgerring merged commit 0e76f04 into main Jul 27, 2023
13 checks passed
@scottgerring scottgerring deleted the chore/checkstyle branch July 27, 2023 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants