Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

setuptools 50.0.0 workaround #73

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ojasjoshi
Copy link
Contributor

@ojasjoshi ojasjoshi commented Sep 1, 2020

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Adding workaround for setuptools v50.0.0 issue at pypa/setuptools#2352

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ojasjoshi ojasjoshi changed the title Ojas/setuptools 50.0.0 workaround setuptools 50.0.0 workaround Sep 1, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #73 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #73   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.16%   88.16%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         321      321           
=======================================
  Hits          283      283           
  Misses         38       38           
Flag Coverage Δ
#ROS_1 89.57% <ø> (ø)
#ROS_2 86.70% <ø> (ø)
#dashing 86.70% <ø> (ø)
#kinetic 89.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8d745e2...42a4872. Read the comment docs.

@ojasjoshi ojasjoshi merged commit 1a7ea60 into master Sep 1, 2020
@ojasjoshi ojasjoshi deleted the ojas/setuptools_50.0.0_workaround branch September 1, 2020 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants