Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(route53): CrossAccountZoneDelegationRecord does not remove old NS… #21599

Closed

Conversation

rangerthegood
Copy link
Contributor

This PR modifies the logic in the cross account zone delegation handler for handling update events. The prior code did not clean up old delegated entries.

This closes #21249

All Submissions:

Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Aug 15, 2022

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team August 15, 2022 01:49
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug This issue is a bug. p2 labels Aug 15, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: be8f5d0
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository


// DELETE old Resources
try {
const oldResourceProps = event.OldResourceProperties as unknown as ResourceProperties;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we only process the delete if the hosted zone or record name changes? I'm a little worried about deleting records when it is not absolutely necessary.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should only delete the old NS record when the DelegatedZoneName of the OldResourceProperties is different from the one from the (new) ResourceProperties. Otherwise we'll be removing and recreating the same record after every 'Update' event which is not necessary and might also produce outages.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. label Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug This issue is a bug. closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. p2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

(route53): CrossAccountZoneDelegationRecord does not remove old NS records when the zoneName changes
4 participants