feat(ec2): support for g6 and gr6 instance types in aws-ec2

[tam0ri]

Reason for this change

The G6 instance types were introduced in April 2024. The instance types are already supported in CloudFormation.

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

[tam0ri]

Exemption Request: This PR is similar to #27823, which didn't need changes to the README and tests.

[lpizzinidev]

Can you please update this method with the newly added instance types?

[tam0ri]

@lpizzinidev Thank you for your review!

Can you please update this method with the newly added instance types?

I added new instance types in isGpuInstanceType. When I added them with being followed by InstanceClass.G5G, ESLint showed warning Maximum allowed is 150., so I added these instance types in a new line.

[lpizzinidev]

Thanks 👍

[lpizzinidev]

Suggested change

	InstanceClass.G6, InstanceClass.GR6,
	InstanceClass.INF1, InstanceClass.INF2];
	InstanceClass.G6, InstanceClass.GR6, InstanceClass.INF1, InstanceClass.INF2];

It should fit in one line.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 89b635e
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[TheRealAmazonKendra]

This probably seems like overkill but we've had some recent regressions because of similar new versions added I'd like to see these values used in an integ test. Could you please add that? You're welcome to add these instance types to an existing test instead of creating an entirely new test.

[TheRealAmazonKendra]

There are some limitation on these new instance types. We cannot merge this at this time.

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Features must contain a change to a README file.
❌ Features must contain a change to a test file.
❌ Features must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.

PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review.

If you would like to request an exemption from the status checks or clarification on feedback, please leave a comment on this PR containing Exemption Request and/or Clarification Request.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Features must contain a change to a README file.
❌ Features must contain a change to a test file.
❌ Features must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.

PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review.

If you would like to request an exemption from the status checks or clarification on feedback, please leave a comment on this PR containing Exemption Request and/or Clarification Request.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.

[maafk]

There are some limitation on these new instance types. We cannot merge this at this time.

Do these limitations still exist? Do you have any insight on what these limitations are?