-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY #1333
Merged
WillChilds-Klein
merged 15 commits into
aws:main
from
WillChilds-Klein:libssl-handle-EAGAIN
Jan 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cfc19c3
Don't return SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL for EOF
WillChilds-Klein c7a55aa
Try returning SSL_ERROR_SSL and set reason
WillChilds-Klein a06c57b
Revert "Try returning SSL_ERROR_SSL and set reason"
WillChilds-Klein 8d9b2fb
Move SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN check to match OSSL 1.1.1
WillChilds-Klein 871c8f1
Revert "Move SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN check to match OSSL 1.1.1"
WillChilds-Klein 97e0230
Revert "Don't return SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL for EOF"
WillChilds-Klein a8829dc
Set out len before returning on err
WillChilds-Klein 19d26a0
Return raw retval on error
WillChilds-Klein 0aa0834
Revert other changes, guard ERR_SYSCALL return
WillChilds-Klein 8b160bf
Revert guard, impl. SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY
WillChilds-Klein 1683627
Reinstate guard, abandon SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY
WillChilds-Klein a866c11
Condition SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL suppression on SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY
WillChilds-Klein 6f4c696
Add assertions around BIO method setters
WillChilds-Klein 0457256
Consolidate test logic
WillChilds-Klein 85c669f
Make source change more readable
WillChilds-Klein File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you tried to read another byte here what do you get?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we get
SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
fromSSL_get_error
, but this time with a ret val of -1 (as opposed to 0 retval on ssl_test.cc L10502).SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
is retryable, that doesn't seem right....moving PR back to draft pending further investigation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, I confirmed that even before this change, trying to read additional bytes after exhausting the
rbio
resulted inSSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
. so, it looks like this change doesn't affect that specific behavior.