Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement low-level derand API for Kyber #1552
Implement low-level derand API for Kyber #1552
Changes from 2 commits
deb62ad
627e462
3e88a86
9f0fe40
57b5ffc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also is there a way to test/ensure this is using a separate part of the coins? I verified the firs call up on 30
indcpa_keypair_derand(pk, sk, coins);
uses KYBER_SYMBYTES and then here you offset that KYBER_SYMBYTES. But this seems fragile and could a future update to indcpa_keypair_derand read more data from the coins and we reuse a part of the coins in a dangerous way? Do you think it's reasonable forcrypto_kem_keypair_derand
to take two coin variables so it's easier to keep them separate? If we messed up this accounting would the KATs break?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather leave more invasive changes for later when we decide to do proper refactoring of Kyber/ML-KEM. Right now, I'm just trying to apply what's done in pq-crystals/kyber@289b852.