Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docextractor: correct docs, type signatures, and links #2595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

lucix-aws
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@lucix-aws lucix-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2024 15:56
@lucix-aws lucix-aws merged commit dd067d0 into main Apr 3, 2024
13 checks passed
@lucix-aws lucix-aws deleted the fix-docextractor branch April 3, 2024 17:25
@@ -189,6 +168,125 @@ func extractTypes(packageName string, types map[string]*ast.TypeSpec, items map[
return nil
}

// We've already converted the model's HTML to Go docs, now for ref docs we
// must convert back. We can't use the model's original docs directly because
// that doesn't include extra content we may inject at codegen.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you have an example of where we would add extra content at codegen on top of what we get from the service?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants