-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(jsii): unable to use nested types from dependencies #1866
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3567bab
fix(dotnet): "Could not infer JSII type for .NET type 'AnonymousObject'"
RomainMuller 654ed5c
Merge branch 'master' into rmuller/fix-dotnet-anonymousobject
RomainMuller 7482433
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into rmuller/fix-dotnet-…
RomainMuller e30d36a
fix(jsii): unable to use nested types from dependencies
RomainMuller efe408c
attempt to fix tests (due to NuGet caching)
RomainMuller a3e186d
Merge branch 'master' into rmuller/fix-nested-foreign-class
RomainMuller b0af94f
Merge branch 'master' into rmuller/fix-nested-foreign-class
RomainMuller 4a69d07
exclude built assets from caches
RomainMuller 6565e01
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into rmuller/fix-dotnet-…
RomainMuller 4455afc
isolate nuget pakcage cache to avoid problems
RomainMuller df22ba7
use pip wheel to better isolate python builds
RomainMuller 2dc4a23
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into rmuller/fix-dotnet-…
RomainMuller 0f211ed
Merge branch 'rmuller/fix-dotnet-anonymousobject' into rmuller/fix-ne…
RomainMuller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
import { submodule } from '@scope/jsii-calc-lib'; | ||
|
||
export class NestedClassInstance { | ||
public static makeInstance(): submodule.NestingClass.NestedClass { | ||
return new submodule.NestingClass.NestedClass(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private constructor() {} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
C# does not allow static member classes to declare protected members (our contract includes some, so that was bad). The presence of the
static
keyword here was a Java-ism, since nested classes in C# (with or withoutstatic
) are actually semantically related to Java static nested classes (the syntactic sugar that Java has for non-static nested classes does not exist in C#).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should have been a separate PR, don'tcha agree?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Except that separate PR's test would not have been able to pass without the other changes in this PR (cannot test I can generate a valid nested class if I can't compile it), and vice-versa (cannot check I generate valid code for a nested class if I generate invalid code for a nested class)...