Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(kernel): Transitively consider properties when deserializing structs #409

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2019

Conversation

RomainMuller
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@RomainMuller RomainMuller requested a review from a team as a code owner March 28, 2019 18:07
@eladb
Copy link
Contributor

eladb commented Mar 28, 2019

Please at least provide an example in the PR description that shows the issue and open an issue to follow up with additional coverage

@RomainMuller RomainMuller merged commit 66789e8 into master Mar 28, 2019
@RomainMuller RomainMuller deleted the rmuller/fix-bug branch March 28, 2019 18:18
RomainMuller added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
### Bug Fixes

* **kernel:** Transitively consider properties when deserializing structs ([#409](#409)) ([66789e8](66789e8))
* **python:** Lift the entire data class hierarchy ([#408](#408)) ([f813620](f813620))

### Features

* **python:** Add support for synchronous callbacks ([#407](#407)) ([4cb91b3](4cb91b3))
@RomainMuller RomainMuller mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2019
eladb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
### Bug Fixes

* **kernel:** Transitively consider properties when deserializing structs ([#409](#409)) ([66789e8](66789e8))
* **python:** Lift the entire data class hierarchy ([#408](#408)) ([f813620](f813620))

### Features

* **python:** Add support for synchronous callbacks ([#407](#407)) ([4cb91b3](4cb91b3))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants