Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving XML parser from aws-c-auth into aws-c-common #674

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Aug 4, 2020

Conversation

rccarper
Copy link
Contributor

@rccarper rccarper commented Jul 29, 2020

Description of changes:
Adding XML parser from aws-c-auth. Made minor changes for naming, also made a couple of types opaque and added accessors.

Justification for leaving aws_xml_attribute visible: it seems reasonable that we could expose an attribute as a name/value pair, and that this would be less awkward than needing a get-attribute, get-name, get-value each time when needing to use a single attribute. (But I'm open to making this opaque too!)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@rccarper rccarper requested a review from a team July 29, 2020 18:26
@rccarper rccarper marked this pull request as draft July 29, 2020 18:49
@rccarper rccarper marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2020 02:48
@graebm
Copy link
Contributor

graebm commented Jul 31, 2020

I know it's a lot more work, but should these go into a new repo, instead of aws-c-common?

@rccarper rccarper merged commit 712f9dd into master Aug 4, 2020
@rccarper rccarper deleted the moving-xml-parser branch August 4, 2020 14:23
graebm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2023
**Issue:**
It's hard to report errors with the current API. Errors are being accidentally ignored, and some errors are never checked (perhaps because it was too much effort?).

**Diagnosis:**
The current callback returns `bool` of whether to continue parsing, rather than our typical `int/AWS_OP_SUCCESS/aws_raise_error()` [error handling](https://github.com/awslabs/aws-c-common/blob/b1ef77c1790a8776b58ae5ae57f90e9534b78991/README.md#error-handling).

This seems like a simple design. But the inconsistency in return type leads to errors being [mistakenly swallowed](awslabs/aws-c-s3#330 (comment)). And it makes it hard when you do want to "bubble up" an error from the callback. Callbacks needs to store a custom `error_code` in their `user_data` to report an error. Most callbacks never bothered to do this, maybe because it was extra work?

**Description of changes:**
- XML traversal callback returns `int` instead of `bool`.
    - If a callback fails, the whole parse() fails.
    - You can no longer stop parsing without causing failure. But in nearly all use-cases we were stopping due to error. I found 1 case where we stopped because we found what we were looking for. But in this case, it didn't really hurt to continue parsing. The reduced complexity seemed worth the change.
- Remove ~aws_xml_parser_new(), aws_xml_parser_destroy(), aws_xml_parser_parse()~, replace with  `aws_xml_parse()`.
    - The new() and destroy() calls were unnecessary. Removing them simplifies use.
- `aws_xml_node_get_name()` just returns `aws_byte_cursor()`, instead of ~int~
    - This can't fail. Changing the signature simplifies use.
- Raise `AWS_ERROR_INVALID_XML` instead of ~AWS_ERROR_MALFORMED_INPUT_STRING~
    - This change is more wishy-washy. It seemed useful to get this new, more specific, error code if it bubbling up from deep within some larger operation, like an S3 meta-request.

**API BREAK:**
We don't know any external uses of this API, so it seems safe to change. The API is only intended for internal use by the aws-c libraries, which are being fixed up now. This API was quickly written as private code in aws-c-auth (awslabs/aws-c-auth#40), then moved to public in aws-c-common (#674) when aws-c-s3 also needed to parse XML. The fact that it was originally private is why this API didn't get more scrutiny originally.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants