docs(readme): add notice about hard fork #9
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant README
participant OriginalRepo
User->>README: Access repository documentation
README-->>User: Display fork information
User->>OriginalRepo: Visit original repository for contributions
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.31% 98.31%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 6519 6519
=======================================
Hits 6409 6409
Misses 81 81
Partials 29 29 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
9-13: Excellent addition of the fork notice!The added notice is well-placed and clearly formatted, providing crucial information about the nature of this fork. It effectively communicates the repository's purpose, maintenance status, and relationship to the original project.
Consider adding a link to the Axone protocol repository or website for additional context. You could modify the line as follows:
- > This repository is a *hard fork* of [ichiban/prolog](https://github.com/ichiban/prolog), customized to meet the specific requirements of the [Axone protocol](https://github.com/axone-protocol). It is maintained independently for our use case, and upstream updates may not be regularly integrated. + > This repository is a *hard fork* of [ichiban/prolog](https://github.com/ichiban/prolog), customized to meet the specific requirements of the [Axone protocol](https://github.com/axone-protocol/axone). It is maintained independently for our use case, and upstream updates may not be regularly integrated.This change assumes that the Axone protocol repository is at
https://github.com/axone-protocol/axone. Please adjust the URL if it's different.
Update Remaining References to Original Repository
Several references to
ichiban/prologstill exist in the README.md, which should be updated or removed to accurately reflect the Axone protocol fork. Please address the following:
- Update or remove badges linking to
github.com/ichiban/prolog.- Modify installation instructions to use the new repository URL.
- Ensure all mentions of
ichiban/prologin descriptions and command examples are relevant to the forked version.Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-13: Review the entire README for consistency with the fork's purposeWhile the added notice effectively communicates the nature of this fork, it's important to ensure that the rest of the README content is still applicable and accurate for this customized version.
Please review the entire README to confirm that all sections are still relevant to the Axone protocol fork. Consider the following points:
- Are all the badges (Go Reference, Actions Status, etc.) still applicable to this fork?
- Does the "What is this?" section need any modifications to reflect the fork's specific purpose?
- Is the "Comparison with Other Libraries" table still relevant?
- Do the installation instructions need to be updated to reflect the new repository URL?
- Are the usage examples still accurate for the forked version?
- Is the "Extensions" section still applicable?
- Does the "Contributing" section need to be adjusted for the fork's workflow?
You may want to run the following command to check for any remaining references to the original repository that might need updating:
Please make any necessary adjustments to ensure the entire README accurately represents the Axone protocol fork.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the original repository that might need updating rg 'ichiban/prolog' README.mdLength of output: 1576
Adds a notice to the README clarifying that this repository is a hard fork of ichiban/prolog, customized for the Axone protocol.