Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support WOFF 2.0 #34

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2016
Merged

Support WOFF 2.0 #34

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2016

Conversation

htanjo
Copy link
Contributor

@htanjo htanjo commented Dec 16, 2015

WOFF 2.0 format is superior to WOFF, and gulp-iconfont supports it now.
I added woff2 to the templates.

And I found the master branch failed the test, so I also updated test assets to fix it.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
.DS_Store
node_modules
test/results
test/results*
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the reason for this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your test code doesn't clean up results_css, results_less and results_scss when test failed. And test/results in .gitignore doesn't match these directories.

I think test should always be passed, but it's safer to ignore results* directories completely.

@backflip
Copy link
Owner

Thanks a lot, LGTM. The only question I have is with regards to the .gitignore

backflip added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2016
@backflip backflip merged commit 04494b8 into backflip:master Mar 10, 2016
@backflip
Copy link
Owner

Sorry about the delay, thanks again!

@htanjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

htanjo commented Mar 15, 2016

No problem! Thanks.
Could you publish to npm if you are ready?

@backflip
Copy link
Owner

Finally published as 2.1.0: https://github.com/backflip/gulp-iconfont-css/releases

@htanjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

htanjo commented Mar 22, 2016

Thank you 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants