Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(builtin): cleanup and optimizations in nodejs_binary & linker #1799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2020

Conversation

gregmagolan
Copy link
Collaborator

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature (please, look at the "Scope of the project" section in the README.md file)
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ def _nodejs_binary_impl(ctx):
_write_loader_script(ctx)

env_vars = "export BAZEL_TARGET=%s\n" % ctx.label
env_vars += "export BAZEL_WORKSPACE=%s\n" % ctx.workspace_name
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, we didn't expect this anywhere else? looks like a breaking change to remove?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

its undocumented & internal use only, so I wouldn't consider it a breaking change

@gregmagolan gregmagolan merged commit 1667d50 into bazel-contrib:master Apr 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants