Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the swift_common.use_toolchain() helper #1257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

brentleyjones
Copy link
Collaborator

This function currently returns an empty list so that adding it to the rules/aspects is a no-op. A future change will have it return a list containing the Swift toolchain type, enabling new toolchain resolution.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471075965
(cherry picked from commit 016604d)

This function currently returns an empty list so that adding it to the rules/aspects is a no-op. A future change will have it return a list containing the Swift toolchain type, enabling new toolchain resolution.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471075965
(cherry picked from commit 016604d)
Signed-off-by: Brentley Jones <github@brentleyjones.com>
@brentleyjones brentleyjones force-pushed the bj/add-the-swift_common.use_toolchain-helper branch from 2831d71 to bcfa554 Compare June 21, 2024 17:23
@brentleyjones brentleyjones merged commit 1bb5972 into master Jun 21, 2024
14 checks passed
@brentleyjones brentleyjones deleted the bj/add-the-swift_common.use_toolchain-helper branch June 21, 2024 17:34
brentleyjones referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
This function currently returns an empty list so that adding it to the rules/aspects is a no-op. A future change will have it return a list containing the Swift toolchain type, enabling new toolchain resolution.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 471075965
brentleyjones referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
PiperOrigin-RevId: 484363853
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants