-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use refute_timeout configured for all refute_ assertions #603
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is going to be a potentially test breaking concern is it worth a deprecation warning or minor version bump?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this is a good question. I honestly don't know. Technically, this is a bug that we're fixing, so it could be a patch. But if we consider the existing behavior as correct and us changing this, it could be considered potentially breaking. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that I've thought about this more. Maybe the change we should make is to default the
refute_timeout
to 100ms instead of 0ms. That would make this not a breaking change. Other tests might wait longer if the email fails to deliver, but they pass as soon as the email is received, so 100ms is a better default than 0ms.I also like that ExUnit's refute_receive_timeout defaults to 100ms. So it keeps us consistent with that, which probably matches people's expectations more closely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems like a nice approach to this. They can always change the default explicitly but half a second longer test suite seems like a low price to pay for a suitable default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brimatteng I updated the default to 100ms, so there's no longer a potential for a breaking change, and I updated the PR description.
I'm also hoping to quickly follow up with a PR that allows users to pass the
timeout
directly, so users should be able to change the timeout per test as desired.