ReadonlyREST is a light-weight Elasticsearch plugin that adds encryption, authentication, authorization and access control capabilities to Elasticsearch embedded REST API. The core of this plugin is an ACL engine that checks each incoming request through a sequence of rules a bit like a firewall. There are a dozen rules that can be grouped in sequences of blocks and form a powerful representation of a logic chain.
The Elasticsearch plugin known as ReadonlyREST Free
is released under the GPLv3 license, or alternatively a commercial license (see ReadonlyREST Embedded) and lays the technological foundations for the companion Kibana plugin which is released in two versions: ReadonlyREST PRO and ReadonlyREST Enterprise.
Unlike the Elasticsearch plugin, the Kibana plugins are commercial only. But rely on the Elasticsearch plugin in order to work.
For a description of the Kibana plugins, skip to the dedicated documentation page instead.
In this document, we are going to describe how to operate the Elasticsearch plugin in all its features. Once installed, this plugin will greatly extend the Elasticsearch HTTP API (port 9200), adding numerous extra capabilities:
- Encryption: transform the Elasticsearch API from HTTP to HTTPS
- Authentication: require credentials
- Authorization: declare groups of users, permissions and partial access to indices.
- Access control: complex logic can be modeled using an ACL (access control list) written in YAML.
- Audit events: a trace of the access requests can be logged to a file or index (or both).
The following diagram models an instance of Elasticsearch with the ReadonlyREST plugin installed and configured with SSL encryption and an ACL with at least one "allow" type ACL block.
-
The User Agent (i.e. cURL, Kibana) sends a search request to Elasticsearch using port 9200 and the HTTPS URL schema.
-
The HTTPS filter in the ReadonlyREST plugin unwraps the SSL layer and hands over the request to the Elasticsearch HTTP stack
-
The HTTP stack in Elasticsearch parses the HTTP request
-
The HTTP handler in Elasticsearch extracts the indices, action, request type, and creates a
SearchRequest
(internal Elasticsearch format). -
The SearchRequest goes through the ACL (access control list), external systems like LDAP can be asynchronously queried, and an exit result is eventually produced.
-
The exit result is used by the audit event serializer, to write a record to index and/or Elasticsearch log file
-
If no ACL block was matched, or if a
type: forbid
block was matched, ReadonlyREST does not forward the search request to the search engine and creates an "unauthorized" HTTP response. -
In case the ACL matches a
type: allow
block, the request is forwarded to the search engine -
The Elasticsearch code creates a search response containing the results of the query
-
The search response is converted to an HTTP response by the Elasticsearch code
-
The HTTP response flows back to ReadonlyREST's HTTPS filter and to the User agent
The simplest method to run Elasticsearch with the ReadonlyREST plugin is to use one of our docker images which you can find on Docker Hub:
docker run -u root -p 9200:9200 -e "I_UNDERSTAND_IMPLICATION_OF_ES_PATCHING=yes" -e "KIBANA_USER_PASS=kibana" -e "ADMIN_USER_PASS=admin" -e "discovery.type=single-node" beshultd/elasticsearch-readonlyrest:8.14.3-ror-latest
OR with Docker Compose:
# docker-compose.yml file content
services:
es-ror:
image: beshultd/elasticsearch-readonlyrest:8.14.3-ror-latest
user: "0:0"
ports:
- "9200:9200"
environment:
- I_UNDERSTAND_IMPLICATION_OF_ES_PATCHING=yes
- KIBANA_USER_PASS=kibana
- ADMIN_USER_PASS=admin
- discovery.type=single-node
(To run the docker-compose.yml call docker compose up
)
Any of these methods, runs Elasticsearch container with ReadonlyREST with init settings.
When the service is started you can test it using curl or Postman:
curl -v -u admin:admin https://localhost:9200
You can create locally customized readonlyrest.yml
file and mount it as a docker volume.
Assuming that your ROR settings file is located in /tmp/my-readonlyrest.yml
you can use it like that:
docker run -u root -p 9200:9200 -e "discovery.type=single-node" -e "I_UNDERSTAND_IMPLICATION_OF_ES_PATCHING=yes" -v /tmp/my-readonlyrest.yml:/etc/share/elasticsearch/config/readonlyrest.yml beshultd/elasticsearch-readonlyrest:8.14.3-ror-latest
OR
# docker-compose.yml file content
services:
es-ror:
image: beshultd/elasticsearch-readonlyrest:8.14.3-ror-latest
user: "0:0"
ports:
- "9200:9200"
environment:
- I_UNDERSTAND_IMPLICATION_OF_ES_PATCHING=yes
- KIBANA_USER_PASS=kibana
- ADMIN_USER_PASS=admin
- discovery.type=single-node
volumes:
- ./my-readonlyrest.yml:/etc/share/elasticsearch/config/readonlyrest.yml # we assume that the `my-readonlyrest.yml` file is in the same folder as `docker-compose.yml` file is
To install the ReadonlyREST plugin for Elasticsearch:
From the official download page. Select your Elasticsearch version and send yourself a link to the compatible ReadonlyREST zip file.
bin/elasticsearch-plugin install file:///tmp/readonlyrest-X.Y.Z_esW.Q.U.zip
Notice how we need to type in the format file://
+ absolute path (yes, with three slashes).
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@ WARNING: plugin requires additional permissions @
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
When prompted about additional permissions, answer y.
If you are using Elasticsearch 6.5.x or newer, you need an extra post-installation step. Depending on the Elasticsearch version, this command might tweak the main Elasticsearch installation files and/or copy some jars to plugins/readonlyrest
directory.
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar patch
root
user privileges.
You can verify if Elasticsearch was correctly patched using the command verify
:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar verify
Please note that the tool assumes that you run it from the root of your ES installation directory or the default installation directory is /usr/share/elasticsearch
. But if you want or need, you can instruct it where your Elasticsearch is installed by executing one of the tool's command with the --es-path
parameter:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar patch --es-path /my/custom/path/to/es/folder
or
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar verify --es-path /my/custom/path/to/es/folder
NB: In case of any problems with the ror-tools
, please call:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar --help
Create and edit the readonlyrest.yml
settings file in the same directory where elasticsearch.yml
is found:
vim $ES_PATH_CONF/conf/readonlyrest.yml
Now write some basic settings, just to get started. In this example, we are going to tell ReadonlyREST to require HTTP Basic Authentication for all the HTTP requests, and return 401 Unauthorized
otherwise.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Require HTTP Basic Auth"
type: allow
auth_key: user:password
(applies to ES 6.4.0 or greater)
ReadonlyREST and X-Pack security module can't run together, so the latter needs to be disabled.
Edit elasticsearch.yml
and append xpack.security.enabled: false
.
vim $ES_PATH_CONF/conf/elasticsearch.yml
bin/elasticsearch
or:
service start elasticsearch
Depending on your environment.
Now you should be able to see the logs and ReadonlyREST-related lines like the one below:
[2018-09-18T13:56:25,275][INFO ][o.e.p.PluginsService ] [c3RKGFJ] loaded plugin [readonlyrest]
The following command should succeed, and the response should show a status code 200.
curl -vvv -u user:password "http://localhost:9200/_cat/indices"
The following command should not succeed, and the response should show a status code 401
curl -vvv "http://localhost:9200/_cat/indices"
To upgrade ReadonlyREST for Elasticsearch:
Either kill the process manually, or use:
service stop elasticsearch
depending on your environment.
If you are using Elasticsearch 6.5.x or newer, you need an extra pre-uninstallation step. This will remove all previously copied jars from ROR's installation directory.
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar unpatch
You can verify if Elasticsearch was correctly unpatched using the command verify
:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar verify
NB: In case of any problems with the ror-tools
, please call:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar --help
bin/elasticsearch-plugin remove readonlyrest
bin/elasticsearch-plugin install file://<download_dir>/readonlyrest-<ROR_VERSION>_es<ES_VERSION>.zip
e.g.
bin/elasticsearch-plugin install file:///tmp/readonlyrest-1.56.0_es8.12.2.zip
If you are using Elasticsearch 6.5.x or newer, you need an extra post-installation step. Depending on the Elasticsearch version, this command might tweak the main Elasticsearch installation files and/or copy some jars to the plugins/readonlyrest
directory.
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar patch
root
user privileges.
You can verify if Elasticsearch was correctly patched using the command verify
:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar verify
NB: In case of any problems with the ror-tools
, please call:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar --help
bin/elasticsearch
or:
service start elasticsearch
Depending on your environment.
Now you should be able to see the logs and ReadonlyREST-related lines like the one below:
[2024-03-14T20:21:49,589][INFO ][t.b.r.b.RorInstance ] [ROR_SINGLE_1] ReadonlyREST was loaded ...
Either kill the process manually, or use:
service stop elasticsearch
depending on your environment.
If you are using Elasticsearch 6.5.x or newer, you need an extra pre-uninstallation step. This will remove all previously copied jars from ROR's installation directory.
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar unpatch
You can verify if Elasticsearch was correctly unpatched using the command verify
:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar verify
NB: In case of any problems with the ror-tools
, please call:
jdk/bin/java -jar plugins/readonlyrest/ror-tools.jar --help
bin/elasticsearch-plugin remove readonlyrest
bin/elasticsearch
or:
service start elasticsearch
Depending on your environment.
Unless some advanced features are being used (see below), this Elasticsearch plugin operates like a lightweight, stateless filter glued in front of Elasticsearch HTTP API. Therefore it's sufficient to install the plugin only in the nodes that expose the HTTP interface (port 9200).
Installing ReadonlyREST in a dedicated node has numerous advantages:
- No need to restart all nodes, only the one you have installed the plugin into.
- No need to restart all nodes to update the security settings
- No need to restart all nodes when a security update is out
- Less complexity on the actual cluster nodes.
For example, if we want to move to HTTPS all the traffic coming from Logstash into a 9-node Elasticsearch cluster which has been running stable in production for a while, it's not necessary to install the ReadonlyREST plugin in all the nodes.
Creating a dedicated, lightweight ES node where to install ReadonlyREST:
- (Optional) disable the HTTP interface from all the existing nodes
- Create a new, lightweight, dedicated node without shards, nor master eligibility.
- Configure ReadonlyREST with SSL encryption in the new node
- Configure Logstash to connect to the new node directly in HTTPS.
fields
rule is used, it's required to install the ReadonlyREST plugin in all the data nodes.
The core of this plugin is an ACL (access control list). A logic structure very similar to the one found in firewalls. The ACL is part of the plugin configuration, and it's written in YAML.
- The ACL is composed of an ordered sequence of named blocks
- Each block contains some rules, and a policy (forbid or allow)
- HTTP requests run through the blocks, starting from the first,
- The first block that satisfies all the rules decides if to forbid or allow the request (according to its policy).
- If none of the blocks is matched, the request is rejected
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Block 1 - only Logstash indices are accessible"
type: allow # <-- default policy type is "allow", so this line could be omitted
indices: ["logstash-*"] # <-- This is a rule
- name: "Block 2 - Blocking everything from a network"
type: forbid
hosts: ["10.0.0.0/24"] # <-- this is a rule
An Example of the Access Control List (ACL) made of 2 blocks.
The YAML snippet above, like all of this plugin's settings should be saved inside the readonlyrest.yml
file. Create this file on the same path where elasticsearch.yml
is found.
TIP: If you are a subscriber of the PRO or Enterprise Kibana plugin, you can edit and refresh the settings through a GUI. For more on this, see the documentation for the ReadonlyREST plugin for Kibana.
An SSL-encrypted connection is a prerequisite for secure exchange of credentials and data over the network. To make use of it you need to have certificate and private key. Letsencrypt certificates work just fine (see tutorial below). Before ReadonlyREST 1.44.0 both files, certificate and private key, had to be placed inside PKCS#12 or JKS keystore. See the tutorial at the end of this section. ReadonlyREST 1.44.0 or newer supports using PEM files directly, without the need to use a keystore.
ReadonlyREST can be configured to encrypt network traffic on two independent levels:
- HTTP (port 9200)
- Internode communication - transport module (port 9300)
An Elasticsearch node with ReadonlyREST can join an existing cluster based on native SSL from
xpack.security
module. This configuration is useful to deploy ReadonlyREST Enterprise for Kibana to an existing large production cluster without disrupting any configuration. More on this in the dedicated paragraph of this section.
It wraps connection between client and exposed REST API in SSL context, hence making it encrypted and secure.
elasticsearch.yml
and append this one line:
http.type: ssl_netty4
Now in readonlyrest.yml
add the following settings:
readonlyrest:
ssl:
keystore_file: "keystore.jks" # or keystore.p12 for PKCS#12 format
keystore_pass: readonlyrest
key_pass: readonlyrest
The keystore should be stored in the same directory with elasticsearch.yml
and readonlyrest.yml
.
This option encrypts communication between nodes forming Elasticsearch cluster.
elasticsearch.yml
and append this one line:
transport.type: ror_ssl_internode
In readonlyrest.yml
following settings must be added (it's just example configuration presenting most important properties):
readonlyrest:
ssl_internode:
keystore_file: "keystore.jks" # or keystore.p12 for PKCS#12 format
keystore_pass: readonlyrest
key_pass: readonlyrest
Similar to ssl
for HTTP, the keystore should be stored in the same directory with elasticsearch.yml
and readonlyrest.yml
. This config must be added to all nodes taking part in encrypted communication within cluster.
It is possible to set up internode SSL between ROR and XPack nodes. It works only for ES above 6.3.
To set up cluster in such configuration you have to generate certificate for ROR node according to this description https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/security-basic-setup.html#generate-certificates.
Generated elastic-certificates.p12
could be then used in ROR node with such configuration
readonlyrest:
ssl_internode:
enable: true
keystore_file: "elastic-certificates.p12"
keystore_pass: [ password for generated certificate ]
key_pass: [ password for generated certificate ]
truststore_file: "elastic-certificates.p12"
truststore_pass: [ password for generated certificate ]
client_authentication: true # default: false
certificate_verification: true # certificate verification is enabled by default on XPack nodes
hostname_verification: false # hostname verification is disabled by default
By default the certificate verification is disabled. It means that certificate is not validated in any way, so all certificates are accepted. It is useful on local/test environment, where security is not the most important concern. On production environment it is advised to enable this option. It can be done by means of:
certificate_verification: true
under ssl_internode
section. This option is applicable only for internode SSL.
By default the hostname verification is disabled. This means that hostname or IP address is not verified to match the names in the certificate. To enable hostname verification add the following lines in the ssl_internode
section:
hostname_verification: true
By default the client authentication is disabled. When enabled, the server asks the client about its certificate, so ES is able to verify the client's identity. It can be enabled by means of:
client_authentication: true
under ssl
section. This option is applicable for REST API external SSL and internode SSL.
Optionally, it's possible to specify a list allowed SSL protocols and SSL ciphers. Connections from clients that don't support the listed protocols or ciphers will be dropped.
readonlyrest:
ssl:
# put the keystore in the same dir with elasticsearch.yml
keystore_file: "keystore.jks"
keystore_pass: readonlyrest
key_pass: readonlyrest
allowed_protocols: [TLSv1.2]
allowed_ciphers: [TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256]
ReadonlyREST will log a list of available ciphers and protocols supported by the current JVM at startup.
[2018-01-03T10:09:38,683][INFO ][t.b.r.e.SSLTransportNetty4] ROR SSL: Available ciphers: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
[2018-01-03T10:09:38,684][INFO ][t.b.r.e.SSLTransportNetty4] ROR SSL: Restricting to ciphers: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
[2018-01-03T10:09:38,684][INFO ][t.b.r.e.SSLTransportNetty4] ROR SSL: Available SSL protocols: TLSv1,TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2
[2018-01-03T10:09:38,685][INFO ][t.b.r.e.SSLTransportNetty4] ROR SSL: Restricting to SSL protocols: TLSv1.2
[2018-0
ReadonlyREST allows using custom truststore, replacing (provided by JRE) default one. Custom truststore can be set with:
truststore_file: "truststore.jks"
truststore_pass: truststorepass
under ssl
or ssl_internode
section. This option is applicable for both ssl modes - external ssl and internode ssl. The truststore should be stored in the same directory with elasticsearch.yml
and readonlyrest.yml
(like keystore). When not specified, ReadonlyREST uses default truststore.
If you are using ReadonlyREST 1.44.0 or newer then you are able to use PEM files directly without the need of placing them inside a keystore or truststore.
To use PEM files instead of keystore file, use such configuration instead of keystore_file
, keystore_pass
, key_pass
fields:
server_certificate_key_file: private_key.pem
server_certificate_file: cert_chain.pem
To use PEM file instead of truststore file, use such configuration instead of truststore_file
, truststore_pass
fields:
client_trusted_certificate_file: trusted_certs.pem
We are going to show how to first add all the certificates and private key into PKCS#12 keystore, and then (optionally) converting it to JKS keystore. ReadonlyREST supports both formats.
This tutorial can be a useful example on how to use certificates from other providers.
./letsencrypt-auto certonly --standalone -d DOMAIN.TLD -d DOMAIN_2.TLD --email EMAIL@EMAIL.TLD
Now change to the directory (probably /etc/letsencrypt/live/DOMAIN.tld) where the certificates were created.
openssl pkcs12 -export -in fullchain.pem -inkey privkey.pem -out pkcs.p12 -name NAME
The STORE_PASS is the password which was entered in step 2) as a password for the pkcs12 file.
keytool -importkeystore -deststorepass PASSWORD_STORE -destkeypass PASSWORD_KEYPASS -destkeystore keystore.jks -srckeystore pkcs.p12 -srcstoretype PKCS12 -srcstorepass STORE_PASS -alias NAME
If you happen to get a java.io.IOException: failed to decrypt safe contents entry: javax.crypto.BadPaddingException: Given final block not properly padded
, you have probably forgotten to enter the correct password from step 2.
(Credits for the original JKS tutorial to Maximilian Boehm)
Each incoming request to the Elasticsearch node passes to the installed plugin. During Elasticsearch node startup, the plugin rejects incoming requests until it starts. The plugin rejects such requests with the 403
forbidden responses by default.
To overwrite this behavior, append to elasticsearch.yml
readonlyrest.not_started_response_code: 503
readonlyrest.failed_to_start_response_code: 503
readonlyrest.not_started_response_code
- HTTP code returned when the plugin does not start yet. Possible values are 403
(default) and 503
.
readonlyrest.failed_to_start_response_code
- HTTP code returned when the plugin failed to start (e.g. by malformed ACL). Possible values are 403
(default) and 503
.
Every block must have at least the name
field, and optionally a type
field valued either "allow" or "forbid". If you omit the type
, your block will be treated as type: allow
by default.
Keep in mind that ReadonlyREST ACL is a white list, so by default all request are blocked, unless you specify a block of rules that allows all or some requests.
name
will appear in logs, so keep it short and distinctive.type
can be eitherallow
orforbid
. Can be omitted, default isallow
.
- name: "Block 1 - Allowing anything from localhost"
type: allow
# In real life now you should increase the specificity by adding rules here (otherwise this block will allow all requests!)
Example: the simplest example of an allow block.
ReadonlyREST access control rules can be divided into the following categories:
- Authentication & Authorization rules
- Elasticsearch level rules
- Kibana-related rules
- HTTP level rules
- Network level rules
Please refrain from using HTTP level rules to protect certain indices or limit what people can do to an index. The level of control at this level is really coarse, especially because Elasticsearch REST API does not always respect RESTful principles. This makes of HTTP a bad abstraction level to write ACLs in Elasticsearch all together.
The only clean and exhaustive way to implement access control is to reason about requests AFTER ElasticSearch has parsed them. Only then, the list of affected indices and the action will be known for sure. See Elasticsearch level rules.
This section contains description of rules that can be used to authenticate and/or authorize users. Most of the following rules use HTTP Basic Auth, so the credentials are passed with the Authorization
header and they can be easily decoded when the request is intercepted by a malicious third party. Please note that this authentication method is secure only if SSL is enabled.
auth_key: sales:p455wd
It's an authentication rule that accepts HTTP Basic Auth. Configure this value in clear text. Clients will need to provide the header e.g. Authorization: Basic c2FsZXM6cDQ1NXdk
where "c2FsZXM6cDQ1NXdk" is Base64 for "sales:p455wd".
auth_key_sha512
, or auth_key_unix
.
Impersonation is supported by this rule without an extra configuration.
auth_key_sha512: 280ac6f...94bf9
The authentication rule that accepts HTTP Basic Auth. The value is a string like username:password
hashed in SHA512. Clients will need to provide the usual Authorization header.
There are also available other rules with less secure SHA algorithms auth_key_sha256
and auth_key_sha1
.
The rules support also alternative syntax, where only password is hashed, eg:
auth_key_sha512: "admin:280ac6f...94bf9"
In the example below admin
is the username and 280ac6f...94bf9
is the hashed secret.
Impersonation is supported by these rules by default.
auth_key_pbkdf2: "KhIxF5EEYkH5GPX51zTRIR4cHqhpRVALSmTaWE18mZEL2KqCkRMeMU4GR848mGq4SDtNvsybtJ/sZBuX6oFaSg=="
# logstash:logstash
auth_key_pbkdf2: "logstash:JltDNAoXNtc7MIBs2FYlW0o1f815ucj+bel3drdAk2yOufg2PNfQ51qr0EQ6RSkojw/DzrDLFDeXONumzwKjOA=="
# logstash:logstash
The authentication rule that accepts HTTP Basic Auth. The value is hashed in the same way as it's done in auth_key_sha512
rule, but it uses PBKDF2 key derivation function. At the moment there is no way to configure it, so during the hash generation, the user has to take into consideration the following PBKDF2 input parameters values:
Input parameter | Value | Comment |
---|---|---|
Pseudorandom function | HmacSHA512 | |
Salt | use hashed value as a salt | eg. hashed value = logstash:logstash , use logstash:logstash as the salt |
Iterations count | 10000 | |
Derived key length | 512 | bits |
The hash can be calculated using this calculator (notice that the salt has to base Base64 encoded).
Impersonation is supported by this rule without an extra configuration.
auth_key_unix: test:$6$rounds=65535$d07dnv4N$QeErsDT9Mz.ZoEPXW3dwQGL7tzwRz.eOrTBepIwfGEwdUAYSy/NirGoOaNyPx8lqiR6DYRSsDzVvVbhP4Y9wf0 # Hashed for "test:test"
This is authentication rule that is based on /etc/shadow
file syntax.
If you configured sha512 encryption with 65535 rounds on your system the hash in /etc/shadow for the account test:test
will be test:$6$rounds=65535$d07dnv4N$QeErsDT9Mz.ZoEPXW3dwQGL7tzwRz.eOrTBepIwfGEwdUAYSy/NirGoOaNyPx8lqiR6DYRSsDzVvVbhP4Y9wf0
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: Accept requests from users in group team1 on index1
groups: ["team1"]
indices: ["index1"]
users:
- username: test
auth_key_unix: test:$6$rounds=65535$d07dnv4N$QeErsDT9Mz.ZoEPXW3dwQGL7tzwRz.eOrTBepIwfGEwdUAYSy/NirGoOaNyPx8lqiR6DYRSsDzVvVbhP4Y9wf0 #test:test
groups: ["team1"]
You can generate the hash with mkpasswd Linux command, you need whois package apt-get install whois
(or equivalent)
mkpasswd -m sha-512 -R 65534
Also you can generate the hash with a python script (works on Linux):
#!/usr/bin/python
import crypt
import random
import sys
import string
def sha512_crypt(password, salt=None, rounds=None):
if salt is None:
rand = random.SystemRandom()
salt = ''.join([rand.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits)
for _ in range(8)])
prefix = '$6$'
if rounds is not None:
rounds = max(1000, min(999999999, rounds or 5000))
prefix += 'rounds={0}$'.format(rounds)
return crypt.crypt(password, prefix + salt)
if __name__ == '__main__':
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
print sha512_crypt(sys.argv[1], rounds=65635)
else:
print "Argument is missing, <password>"
Finally you have to put your username at the beginning of the hash with ":" separator test:$6$rounds=65535$d07dnv4N$QeErsDT9Mz.ZoEPXW3dwQGL7tzwRz.eOrTBepIwfGEwdUAYSy/NirGoOaNyPx8lqiR6DYRSsDzVvVbhP4Y9wf0
For example, test
is the username and $6$rounds=65535$d07dnv4N$QeErsDT9Mz.ZoEPXW3dwQGL7tzwRz.eOrTBepIwfGEwdUAYSy/NirGoOaNyPx8lqiR6DYRSsDzVvVbhP4Y9wf0
is the hash for test
(the password is identical to the username in this example).
Impersonation is supported by this rule without an extra configuration.
token_authentication:
token: "Bearer AAEAAWVsYXN0aWMva2liYW5hL3Rva2Vu" # required, expected HTTP header content containing the token
username: admin # required, the username used after successful authentication
header: x-custom-authorization # optional, defaults to 'Authorization`
The authentication rule that accepts token sent in the HTTP header (the Authorization
header is the default if no custom header name is configured in the token_authentication.header
field).
For the HTTP header in the format Authorization: Bearer AAEAAWVsYXN0aWMva2liYW5hL3Rva2Vu
, the Bearer AAEAAWVsYXN0aWMva2liYW5hL3Rva2Vu
is the token value set in the token
field.
Impersonation is supported by this rule without an extra configuration.
proxy_auth: "*"
Delegated authentication. Trust that a reverse proxy has taken care of authenticating the request and has written the resolved user name into the X-Forwarded-User
header. The value "*" in the example, will let this rule match any username value contained in the X-Forwarded-User
header.
If you are using this technique for authentication using our Kibana plugins, don't forget to add this snippet to conf/kibana.yml
:
readonlyrest_kbn.proxy_auth_passthrough: true
So that Kibana will forward the necessary headers to Elasticsearch.
Impersonation is supported by this rule without an extra configuration.
groups_or: ["group1", "group2"]
The ACL block will match when the user belongs to any of the specified groups. The information about what users belong to what groups is defined in the users
section, typically situated after the ACL, further down in the YAML.
In the users
section, each entry tells us that:
- A given user with a username matching one of patterns in the
username
array ... - belongs to the local groups listed in the
groups
array (example 1 & 2 below) OR belongs to local groups that are result of "detailed group mapping" between local group ID and external groups (example 3 below). - when they can be authenticated and (if authorization rule is present) authorized by the present rule(s).
In general it looks like this:
...
- name: "ACL block with groups rule"
indices: [x, y]
groups_or: ["local_group1"] # this group ID is defined in the "users" section
users:
- username: ["pattern1", "pattern2", ...]
groups_or: ["local_group1", "local_group2", ...]
<any_authentication_rule>: ...
- username: ["pattern1", "pattern2", ...]
groups_or: ["local_group1", "local_group2", ...]
<any_authentication_rule>: ...
<optionally_any_authorization_rule>: ...
- username: ["pattern1", "pattern2", ...]
groups_or:
- local_group1: ["external_group1", "external_group2"]
- local_group2: ["external_group2"]
<authentication_with_authorization_rule>: ... # `ldap_auth` or `jwt_auth` or `ror_kbn_auth`
For details see User management.
Impersonation support depends on
authentication and authorization rules used in users
section.
For more information on the ROR's authorization rules, see Authorization rules details
groups_and: ["group1", "group2"]
This rule is identical to the above defined groups
rule, but this time ALL the groups listed in the array are required (boolean AND logic), as opposed to at least one (boolean OR logic) of the groups
rule.
simple version:
ldap_authentication: ldap1
extended version:
ldap_authentication:
name: ldap1
cache_ttl: 10 sec
It handles LDAP authentication only using the configured LDAP connector (here ldap1
). Check the LDAP connector section to see how to configure the connector.
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap1"
groups: ["group3"]
cache_ttl: 10 sec
It handles LDAP authorization only using the configured LDAP connector (here ldap1
). It matches when previously authenticated user has groups in LDAP and when he belongs to at least one of the configured groups
(OR logic). Alternatively, groups_and
can be used to require users belong to all the listed groups (AND logic). Check the LDAP connector section to see how to configure the connector.
Shorthand rule that combines ldap_authentication
and ldap_authorization
rules together. It handles both authentication and authorization using the configured LDAP connector (here ldap1
).
ldap_auth:
name: "ldap1"
groups: ["group1", "group2"]
The same functionality can be achieved using the two rules described below:
ldap_authentication: ldap1
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap1"
groups: ["group1", "group2"] # match when user belongs to at least one group
In both ldap_auth
and ldap_authorization
, the groups
clause can be replaced by group_and
to require the valid LDAP user must belong to all the listed groups:
ldap_auth:
name: "ldap1"
groups_and: ["group1", "group2"] # match when user belongs to ALL listed groups
Or equivalently:
ldap_authentication: ldap1
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap1"
groups_and: ["group1", "group2"] # match when user belongs to ALL listed groups
See the dedicated LDAP section
Impersonation support by LDAP rules requires to add an extra configuration.
For more information on the ROR's authorization rules, see Authorization rules details
See below, the dedicated JSON Web Tokens section. It's an authentication and authorization rule at the same time.
Impersonation is not currently supported by this rule.
Used to delegate authentication to another server that supports HTTP Basic Auth. See below, the dedicated External BASIC Auth section
Impersonation support by this rule requires to add an extra configuration.
For more information on the ROR's authorization rules, see Authorization rules details
Used to delegate groups resolution for a user to a JSON microservice. See below, the dedicated Groups Provider Authorization section
Impersonation support by this rule requires to add an extra configuration.
For more information on the ROR's authorization rules, see Authorization rules details
ror_kbn_auth
(Enterprise)
For Enterprise customers only, required for SAML authentication. From ROR's perspective it authenticates and authorize users.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "ReadonlyREST Enterprise instance #1"
ror_kbn_auth:
name: "kbn1"
groups: ["SAML_GRP_1", "SAML_GRP_2"] # <- use this field when a user should belong to at least one of the configured groups
- name: "ReadonlyREST Enterprise instance #1 - two groups required"
ror_kbn_auth:
name: "kbn1"
groups_and: ["SAML_GRP_1", "SAML_GRP_2"] # <- use this field when a user should belong to all configured groups
- name: "ReadonlyREST Enterprise instance #2"
ror_kbn_auth:
name: "kbn2"
ror_kbn:
- name: kbn1
signature_key: "shared_secret_kibana1" # <- use environmental variables for better security!
- name: kbn2
signature_key: "shared_secret_kibana2" # <- use environmental variables for better security!
This authentication and authorization connector represents the secure channel (based on JWT tokens) of signed messages necessary for our Enterprise Kibana plugin to securely pass back to ES the username and groups information coming from browser-driven authentication protocols like SAML
Continue reading about this in the kibana plugin documentation, in the dedicated SAML section
Impersonation is currently not supported by this rule.
For more information on the ROR's authorization rules, see Authorization rules details
users: ["root", "*@mydomain.com"]
It's NOT an authentication rule, but it can be used to limit access to of specific users whose username is contained or matches the patterns in the array. This rule is independent from the authentication method chosen, so it will work well in conjunction LDAP, JWT, proxy_auth, and all others. The rule won't be matched if there won't be an authenticated user by some other authentication rule (it means that to make sense, it should always be used in conjunction with some authentication rule).
For example:
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "JWT auth for viewer group (role), limited to certain usernames"
kibana:
access: ro
users: ["root", "*@mydomain.com"]
jwt_auth:
name: "jwt_provider_1"
groups: ["viewer"]
The kibana
rule underpins all ROR Kibana-related settings that may be needed to provide great user experience.
kibana:
access: ro # required
index: ".kibana_custom_index" # optional
template_index: ".kibana_template" # optional
hide_apps: [ "Security", "Enterprise Search"] # optional
allowed_api_paths: # optional
- "^/api/spaces/.*$"
- http_method: POST
http_path: "^/api/saved_objects/.*$"
metadata:
dept: "@{jwt:tech.beshu.department}"
alert_message: "Dear @{acl.current_group} users, you are viewing dashboards for indices @{acl:available_groups}_logstash-*"
The rule consists of several sub-rules:
Enables the minimum set of Elasticsearch actions
necessary for browsers to sustain a Kibana session, and rejects any other unrelated actions.
This "macro" rule allows the minimum set of actions necessary for a browser to use Kibana. It allows a set of actions towards the designated kibana index (see kibana.index
), plus a stricter subset of read-only actions towards other indices, which are considered "data indices".
The idea is that with one single sub-rule we allow the bare minimum set of index+action combinations necessary to support a Kibana browsing session.
Possible access levels:
ro_strict
: the browser has a read-only view on Kibana dashboards and settings and all other indices.ro
: some write requests can go through to thekibana_index
index so that the UI state in "Discover" can be saved and new short urls can be created.rw
: some more requests will be allowed towards thekibana_index
index only, so Kibana dashboards and settings can be modified.admin
: likerw
, but has additional permissions to save security settings in the ReadonlyREST PRO/Enterprise appapi_only
: only Kibana REST API actions are allowed, login via browser is always denied.unrestricted
: no action is restricted.
NB: The admin
access level does not mean the user will be allowed to access all indices/actions. It's just like "rw" with settings changes privileges. If you truly require unrestricted access for your Kibana user, including ReadonlyREST PRO/Enterprise app, set kibana.access: unrestricted
. You can use this rule with the users
rule to restrict access to selected admins.
This sub-rule is often used with the indices
rule, to limit the data a user is able to see represented on the dashboards. In that case do not forget to allow the custom kibana index in the indices
rule!
index
(Enterprise)
Default value is .kibana
Specify to what index we expect Kibana to attempt to read/write its settings (use this together with kibana.index
setting in the kibana.yml
file)
This value directly affects how kibana.access
works because at all the access levels (yes, even admin), kibana.access
sub-rule will NOT match any write request in indices that are not the designated kibana index.
If used in conjunction with ReadonlyREST Enterprise, this rule enables multi tenancy, because in ReadonlyREST, a tenancy is identified with a set of Kibana configurations, which are by design collected inside a kibana index (default: .kibana
).
It supports dynamic variables.
kibana
rule together with the indices
rule in the same block, you don't have to explicitly allow
the Kibana-related indices in the list of allowed indices of the indices
rule. ROR will do it for you automatically.
Example:
- name: "::RW_USER::"
auth_key: rw_user:pwd
kibana:
access: rw
indices: ["r*"] # .kibana, .kibana_8.10.4, .kibana_task_manager, etc are allowed here, because there is the `kibana` rule present in the same block
template_index
(Enterprise)
Used to pre-populate tenancies with default kibana objects, like dashboards and visualizations. Thus providing a starting point for new tenants that will avoid the bad user experience of logging for the first time and finding a completely empty Kibana.
It supports dynamic variables.
hide_apps
(PRO)
Specify which Kibana apps and menu items should be hidden. This feature will work in ReadonlyREST PRO and Enterprise.
For more information on the ROR's Kibana Hide Apps feature, see Hiding Kibana Apps.
Used to define which parts of Kibana REST API can be used. The sub-rule requires to define a list of regular expressions which describes the API paths. Additionally, when you would like to restrict only specific HTTP methods of the API, you can use the extended format of the sub-rule:
kibana:
[...]
allowed_api_paths: # optional
- http_method: POST
http_path: "^/api/saved_objects/.*$"
metadata
(Enterprise)
User to define the Custom ROR Kibana Metadata which can be used in Custom middleware. The kibana.metadata
in ReadonlyREST settings is an unstructured YAML object.
It supports dynamic variables.
Sample usage:
kibana:
[...]
metadata:
alert_message: "Dear @{acl.current_group} users, you are viewing dashboards for indices @{acl:available_groups}_logstash-*"
alert_message
Metadata can be used on the Kibana side to display information to the user on login to the Kibana.
Declare custom Kibana JS file readonlyrest_kbn.kibana_custom_js_inject_file: '/path/to/custom_kibana.js'
. it's injected at the end of the HTML Body tag of the Kibana UI frontend code.
const alertMessage = window.ROR_METADATA.customMetadata && window.ROR_METADATA.customMetadata.alert_message;
if (alertMessage) {
alert(alertMessage);
}
kibana_access: ro
kibana.access
. Should no longer be used.
kibana_index
(Enterprise)
kibana_index: .kibana-user1
kibana.index
. Should no longer be used.
kibana_template_index
(Enterprise)
kibana_template_index: .kibana_template
kibana.template_index
. Should no longer be used.
kibana_hide_apps
(PRO)
kibana_hide_apps: [ "Security", "Enterprise Search"]
kibana.hide_apps
. Should no longer be used.
indices: ["sales", "logstash-*"]
Matches if the request involves a set of indices (or aliases, or data streams) whose name is "sales", or starts with the string "logstash-", or a combination of both.
If a request involves a wildcard (i.e. "logstash-*", "*"), this is first expanded to the list of available indices, and then treated normally as follows:
- Requests that do not involve any indices (cluster admin, etc) result in a "match".
- Requests that involve only allowed indices result in a "match".
- Requests that involve a mix of allowed and not-allowed indices, are rewritten to only involve allowed indices, and result in a "match".
- Requests that involve only not-allowed indices result in a "no match". And the ACL evaluation moves on to the next block.
The rejection message and HTTP status code returned to the requester are chosen carefully with the main intent to simulate not-allowed indices do not exist at all.
The rule has also an extended version:
indices:
patterns: ["sales", "logstash-*"]`
must_involve_indices: false
The definition above has the same meaning as the shortest version shown at the beginning of this section. By default the rule will be matched when a request doesn't involve indices (eg. /_cat/nodes request). But we can change the behaviour by configuring must_involve_indices: true
- in this case the request above will be rejected by the rule.
In detail, with examples
In ReadonlyREST we roughly classify requests as:
- "read": the request will not change the data or the configuration of the cluster
- "write": when allowed, the request changes the internal state of the cluster or the data.
If a read request involves some indices they have permissions for and some indices that they do NOT have permission for, the request is rewritten to involve only the subset of indices they have permission for. This is behaviour is very useful in Kibana: different users can see the same dashboards, but they are filled with a different, overlapping, or identical data set (according to the indices permissions).
When the subset of indices is empty, it means that user are not allowed to access requested indices. In multitenancy environment we should consider two options:
- requested indices don't exist
- requested indices exist but the current user is not authorized to access them
For both of these cases ROR is going to return HTTP 404 or HTTP 200 with an empty response. The same behaviour will be observed for ES with ROR disabled (for nonexistent index). If an index does exist, but a user is not authorized to access it, ROR is going to pretend that the index doesn't exist and a response will be the same like the index actually did not exist. See detailed example.
It's also worth mentioning, that when prompt_for_basic_auth
is set to true
(that is disabled by default), ROR will return 401 instead of 404 HTTP status code. It is relevant for users who don't use ROR Kibana's plugin and would like to take advantage of default Kibana's behavior which shows the native browser basic auth dialog, when it receives HTTP 401 response.
If a write request wants to write to indices they don't have permission for, the write request is rejected.
Requests related to templates
Templates are also connected with indices, but rather indirectly. An index template has index patterns and could also have aliases. During an index template creation or modification, ROR checks if index patterns and aliases, defined in a request body, are allowed. When a user tries to remove or get template by name, ROR checks if the template can be considered as allowed for the user, and based on that information, it allows/forbids to remove or see it. See details.
actions: ["indices:data/read/*"]
Match if the request action starts with "indices:data/read/".
In Elasticsearch, each request carries only one action. We extracted from Elasticsearch source code the full list of valid action strings as of all Elasticsearch versions. Please see the dedicated section to find the actions list of your specific Elasticsearch version.
Example actions (see above for the full list):
"cluster:admin/data_frame/delete"
"cluster:admin/data_frame/preview"
...
"cluster:monitor/data_frame/stats/get"
"cluster:monitor/health"
"cluster:monitor/main"
"cluster:monitor/nodes/hot_threads"
"cluster:monitor/nodes/info"
...
"indices:admin/aliases"
"indices:admin/aliases/get"
"indices:admin/analyze"
...
"indices:data/read/get"
"indices:data/read/mget"
"indices:data/read/msearch"
"indices:data/read/msearch/template"
...
"indices:data/write/bulk"
"indices:data/write/bulk_shard_operations[s]"
"indices:data/write/delete"
"indices:data/write/delete/byquery"
"indices:data/write/index"
"indices:data/write/reindex"
...
many more...
snapshots: ["snap_@{user}_*"]
Restrict what snapshots names can be saved or restored
repositories: ["repo_@{user}_*"]
Restrict what repositories can snapshots be saved into
data_streams: ["ds_@{user}_*"]
Restrict what data stream names can be created, deleted, or modified
filter: '{"query_string":{"query":"user:@{user}"}}'
This rule enables Document Level Security (DLS). That is: return only the documents that satisfy the boolean query provided as an argument.
This rule lets you filter the results of a read request using a boolean query. You can use dynamic variables i.e. @{user}
(see dedicated paragraph) to inject a user name or some header values in the query, or even environmental variables.
Example: per-user index segmentation
In the index "test-dls", each user can only search documents whose field "user" matches their user name. I.e. A user with username "paul" requesting all documents in "test-dls" index, won't see returned a document containing a field "user": "jeff"
.
- name: "::PER-USER INDEX SEGMENTATION::"
proxy_auth: "*"
indices: ["test-dls"]
filter: '{"bool": { "must": { "match": { "user": "@{user}" }}}}'
Example 2: Prevent search of "classified" documents.
In this example, we want to avoid that users belonging to group "press" can see any document that has a field "access_level" with the value "CLASSIFIED". And this policy is applied to all indices (no indices rule is specified).
- name: "::Press::"
groups: ["press"]
filter: '{"bool": { "must_not": { "match": { "access_level": "CLASSIFIED" }}}}'
filter
and fields
rules will only affect "read" requests, therefore "write" requests will not match because otherwise it would implicitly allow clients to "write" without the filtering restriction. For reference, this behaviour is identical to x-pack and search guard.
filter
and/or fields
rules. There requests are used to perform kibana login and dynamic config reload.
If you want to allow write requests (i.e. for Kibana sessions), just duplicate the ACL block, have the first one with filter
and/or fields
rule, and the second one without.
This rule enables Field Level Security (FLS). That is:
- for responses where fields with values are returned (e.g. Search/Get API) - filter and show only allowed fields
- make not allowed fields unsearchable - used in QueryDSL requests (e.g. Search/MSearch API) do not have impact on search result.
In other words: FLS protects from usage some not allowed fields for a certain user. From user's perspective it seems like such fields are nonexistent.
Definition
Field rule definition consists of two parts:
- A non empty list of fields (blacklisted or whitelisted) names. Supports wildcards and user runtime variables.
- The FLS engine definition (global setting, optional). See: engine details.
Field names
Fields can be defined using two access modes: blacklist and whitelist.
Blacklist mode (recommended)
Specifies which fields should not be allowed prefixed with ~
(other fields from mapping become allowed implicitly). Example:
fields: ["~excluded_fields_prefix_*", "~excluded_field", "~another_excluded_field.nested_field"]
Return documents but deprived of the fields that:
- start with
excluded_fields_prefix_
- are equal to
excluded_field
- are equal to
another_excluded_field.nested_field
Whitelist mode
Specifies which fields should be allowed explicitly (other fields from mapping become not allowed implicitly). Example:
fields: ["allowed_fields_prefix_*", "_*", "allowed_field.nested_field.text"]
Return documents deprived of all the fields, except the ones that:
- start with
allowed_fields_prefix_
- start with underscore
- are equal to
allowed_field.nested_field.text
NB: You can only provide a full black list or white list. Grey lists (i.e. ["~a", "b"]
) are invalid settings and ROR will refuse to boot up if this condition is detected.
Example: hide prices from catalogue indices
- name: "External users - hide prices"
fields: ["~price"]
indices: ["catalogue_*"]
_id
or _index
can not be used in fields
rule.
filter
and fields
rules will only affect "read" requests, therefore "write" requests will not match because otherwise it would implicitly allow clients to "write" without the filtering restriction. For reference, this behaviour is identical to x-pack and search guard.
filter
and/or fields
rules. There requests are used to perform kibana login and dynamic config reload.
If you want to allow write requests (i.e. for Kibana sessions), just duplicate the ACL block, have the first one with filter
and/or fields
rule, and the second one without.
A normal Kibana session interacts with Elasticsearch using a mix of actions which we can roughly group in two macro categories of "read" and "write" actions. However the fields
and filter
rules will only match read requests. They will also block ROR internal request used to log in to kibana and reload config. This means that a complete Kibana session cannot anymore be entirely matched by a single ACL block like it normally would.
For example, this ACL block would perfectly support a complete Kibana session. That is, 100% of the actions (browser HTTP requests) would be allowed by this ACL block.
- name: "::RW_USER::"
auth_key: rw_user:pwd
kibana:
access: rw
indices: ["r*"]
However, when we introduce a filter (or fields) rule, this block will be able to match only some of the actions (only the "read" ones).
- name: "::RW_USER::"
auth_key: rw_user:pwd
kibana:
access: rw # <-- won't work because of `filter` rule present in block (it mismatches RW requests)
indices: ["r*"]
filter: '{"query_string":{"query":"DestCountry:FR"}}' # <-- will reject all write requests! :(
The solution is to duplicate the block. The first one will intercept (and filter!) the read requests. The second one will intercept the remaining actions. Both ACL blocks together will entirely support a whole Kibana session.
- name: "::RW_USER (filter read requests)::"
auth_key: rw_user:pwd
indices: ["r*"] # <-- KIBANA-RELATED INDICES WON"T BE FILTERED HERE!
filter: '{"query_string":{"query":"DestCountry:FR"}}'
- name: "::RW_USER (allow remaining requests)::"
auth_key: rw_user:pwd
kibana:
access: rw
indices: ["r*"] # <-- KIBANA-RELATED INDICES ARE IMPLICITLY ALLOWED! (because of the presence of the `kibana` rule in the same block)
NB: Look at how we make sure that the requests to ".kibana" won't get filtered by specifying an indices
rule in the first block.
Here is another example, a bit more complex. Look at how we can duplicate the "PERSONAL_GRP" ACL block so that the read requests to the "r*" indices can be filtered, and all the other requests can be intercepted by the second rule (which is identical to the one we had before the duplication).
Before adding the filter
rule:
- name: "::PERSONAL_GRP::"
groups: ["Personal"]
kibana:
access: rw
index: ".kibana_@{user}"
hide_apps: ["readonlyrest_kbn", "timelion"]
indices: ["r*"]
After adding the filter
rule (using the block duplication strategy).
- name: "::PERSONAL_GRP (FILTERED SEARCH)::"
groups: ["Personal"]
indices: [ "r*" ]
filter: '{"query_string":{"query":"DestCountry:FR"}}'
- name: "::PERSONAL_GRP::"
groups: ["Personal"]
indices: ["r*"]
kibana:
access: rw
index: ".kibana_@{user}"
hide_apps: ["readonlyrest_kbn", "timelion"]
This rule allows filtering Elasticsearch responses using a list of fields. It works in very similar way to fields
rule. In contrast to fields
rule, which filters out document fields, this rule filters out response fields. It doesn't make use of Field Level Security (FLS) and can be applied to every response returned by Elasticsearch.
It can be configured in two modes:
- whitelist allowing only the defined fields from the response object
- blacklist filtering out (removing) only the defined fields from the response object
Blacklist mode
Specifies which fields should be filtered out by adding the ~ prefix to the field name. Other fields in the response will be implicitly allowed. For example:
response_fields: ["~excluded_fields_prefix_*", "~excluded_field", "~another_excluded_field.nested_field"]
The above will return the usual response object, but deprived (if found) of the fields that:
- start with
excluded_fields_prefix_
- are equal to
excluded_field
- are equal to
another_excluded_field.nested_field
Wildcard across nested fields
It's possible to use the *
character to intercept nested fields. Imagine having this document:
{
"_index":"kafka-both",
"_type":"_doc",
"_id":"460D9",
"_score":8.649008,
"_source":{
"session_id":64124.0,
"country":"something",
"resp":{
"credit_card_confidential": "378282246310005"
"proc_time":0.02,
"type":"spelling",
"raw_text":{
"proc_time":0.02,
"system_entities":{
"phone_number_confidential":[
{
"unit":"Number",
"string":"666",
"value":666
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
You can write this fields
rule containing a pattern that uses the *
right after the ~
:
fields: ["~*_confidential"]
Now the search response will omit the string field credit_card_confidential
, and the whole object resp.raw_text.phone_number_confidential
, or any other field whose name ends in "_confidential", regardless of their type or if and how deeply it's nested.
Whitelist mode
In this mode rule is configured to filter out each field that isn't defined in the rule.
response_fields: ["allowed_fields_prefix_*", "_*", "allowed_field.nested_field.text"]
Return response deprived of all the fields, except the ones that:
- start with
allowed_fields_prefix_
- start with underscore
- are equal to
allowed_field.nested_field.text
NB: You can only provide a full black list or white list. Grey lists (i.e. ["~a", "b"]
) are invalid settings and ROR will refuse to boot up if this condition is detected.
Example: allow only cluster_name
and status
field in cluster health response:
Without any filtering response from /_cluster/health
looks more or less like:
{
"cluster_name": "ROR_SINGLE",
"status": "yellow",
"timed_out": false,
"number_of_nodes": 1,
"number_of_data_nodes": 1,
"active_primary_shards": 2,
"active_shards": 2,
"relocating_shards": 0,
"initializing_shards": 0,
"unassigned_shards": 2,
"delayed_unassigned_shards": 0,
"number_of_pending_tasks": 0,
"number_of_in_flight_fetch": 0,
"task_max_waiting_in_queue_millis": 0,
"active_shards_percent_as_number": 50.0
}
but after configuring such rule:
- name: "Filter cluster health response"
uri_re: "^/_cluster/health"
response_fields: ["cluster_name", "status"]
response from above will look like:
{
"cluster_name": "ROR_SINGLE",
"status": "yellow"
}
NB: Any response field can be filtered using this rule.
x_forwarded_for: ["192.168.1.0/24"]
Behaves exactly like hosts
, but gets the source IP address (a.k.a. origin address, OA
in logs) inside the X-Forwarded-For
header only (useful replacement to hosts
rule when requests come through a load balancer like AWS ELB)
Load balancers
This is a nice tip if your Elasticsearch is behind a load balancer. If you want to match all the requests that come through the load balancer, use x_forwarded_for: ["0.0.0.0/0"]
. This will match the requests with a valid IP address as a value of the X-Forwarded-For
header.
DNS lookup caching
It's worth to note that resolutions of DNS are going to be cached by JVM. By default successfully resolved IPs will be cached forever (until Elasticsearch is restarted) for security reasons. However, this may not always be the desired behaviour, and it can be changed by adding the following JVM options either in the jvm.options file or declaring the ES_JAVA_OPTS environment variable: sun.net.inetaddr.ttl=TTL_VALUE
(or/and sun.net.inetaddr.negative.ttl=TTL_VALUE
). More details about the problem can be found here.
methods: [GET, DELETE]
Match requests with HTTP methods specified in the list. N.B. Elasticsearch HTTP stack does not make any difference between HEAD and GET, so all the HEAD request will appear as GET.
headers: ["h1:x*y","~h2:*xy"]
Match if all the HTTP headers in the request match the defined patterns in headers rule. This is useful in conjunction with proxy_auth, to carry authorization information (i.e. headers: x-usr-group: admins
).
The ~
sign is a pattern negation, so eg. ~h2:*xy
means: match if h2 header's value does not match the pattern *xy, or h2
is not present at all.
headers_or: ["x-myheader:val*","~header2:*xy"]
Match if at least one the specified HTTP headers key:value
pairs is matched.
uri_re: ["^/secret-index/.*", "^/some-index/.*"]
☠️HACKY (try to use indices/actions rule instead)
Match if at least one specified regular expression matches requested URI.
maxBodyLength: 0
Match requests having a request body length less or equal to an integer. Use 0
to match only requests without body.
NB: Elasticsearch HTTP API breaks the specifications, nad GET requests might have a body length greater than zero.
api_keys: [123456, abcdefg]
A list of api keys expected in the header X-Api-Key
session_max_idle: 1h
These are the most basic rules. It is possible to allow/forbid requests originating from a list of IP addresses, host names or IP networks (in slash notation).
hosts: ["10.0.0.0/24"]
Match a request whose origin IP address (also called origin address, or OA
in logs) matches one of the specified IP addresses or subnets.
accept_x-forwarded-for_header: false
x_forwarded_for instead
) A modifier for hosts
rule: if the origin IP won't match, fallback to check the X-Forwarded-For
header
hosts_local: ["127.0.0.1", "127.0.0.2"]
Match a request whose destination IP address (called DA
in logs) matches one of the specified IP addresses or subnets. This finds application when Elasticsearch HTTP API is bound to multiple IP addresses.
verbosity: error
Don't spam elasticsearch log file printing log lines for requests that match this block. Defaults to info
.
The main issues seen in support cases:
- Bad ordering or ACL blocks. Remember that the ACL is evaluated sequentially, block by block. And the first block whose rules all match is accepted.
- Users don't know how to read the
HIS
field in the logs, which instead is crucial because it contains a trace of the evaluation of rules and blocks. - LDAP configuration: LDAP is tricky to configure in any system. Configure ES root logger to
DEBUG
editing$ES_PATH_CONF/config/log4j2.properties
to see a trace of the LDAP messages.
ReadonlyREST prints a log line for each incoming request (this can be selectively avoided on ACL block level using the verbosity
rule).
Allowed requests
This is an example of a request that matched an ACL block (allowed) and has been let through to Elasticsearch.
ALLOWED by { name: '::PERSONAL_GRP::', policy: ALLOW} req={ ID:1667655475--1038482600#1312339, TYP:SearchRequest, CGR:N/A, USR:simone, BRS:true, ACT:indices:data/read/search, OA:127.0.0.1, IDX:, MET:GET, PTH:/_search, CNT:<N/A>, HDR:Accept,Authorization,content-length,Content-Type,Host,User-Agent,X-Forwarded-For, HIS:[::PERSONAL_GRP::->[kibana_access->true, kibana_hide_apps->true, auth_key->true, kibana_index->true]], [::Kafka::->[auth_key->false]], [::KIBANA-SRV::->[auth_key->false]], [guest lol->[auth_key->false]], [::LOGSTASH::->[auth_key->false]] }
Explanation
The log line immediately states that this request has been allowed by an ACL block called "::PERSONAL_GRP::". Immediately follows a summary of the requests' anatomy. The format is semi-structured, and it's intended for humans to read quickly, it's not JSON, or anything else.
Similar information gets logged in JSON format via audit events feature described later.
Here is a glossary:
ID
: ReadonlyREST-level request idTYP
: String, the name of the Java class that internally represent the request type (very useful for debug)CGR
: String, the request carries a "current group" header (used for multi-tenancy).USR
: String, the user name ReadonlyREST was able to extract from Basic Auth, JWT, LDAP, or other methods as specified in the ACL.BRS
: Boolean, an heuristic attempt to tell if the request comes from a browser.ACT
: String, the elasticsearch level action associated with the request. For a list of actions, see our actions rule docs.OA
: IP Address, originating address (source address) of the TCP connection underlying the http session.IDX
: Strings array: the list of indices affected by this request.MET
: String, HTTP MethodCNT
: String, HTTP body content. Comes as a summary of its length, full body of the request is available in debug mode.HDR
: String array, list of HTTP headers, headers' content is available in debug mode.HIS
: Chronologically ordered history of the ACL blocks and their rules being evaluated, This is super useful for knowing what ACL block/rule is forbidding/allowing this request.
In the example, the block ::PERSONAL_GRP::
is allowing the request because all the rules in this block evaluate to true
.
Forbidden requests
This is an example of a request that gets forbidden by ReadonlyREST ACL.
FORBIDDEN by default req={ ID:747832602--1038482600#1312150, TYP:SearchRequest, CGR:N/A, USR:[no basic auth header], BRS:true, ACT:indices:data/read/search, OA:127.0.0.1, IDX:, MET:GET, PTH:/_search, CNT:<N/A>, HDR:Accept,content-length,Content-Type,Host,User-Agent,X-Forwarded-For, HIS:[::Infosec::->[groups->false]], [::KIBANA-SRV::->[auth_key->false]], [guest lol->[auth_key->false]], [::LOGSTASH::->[auth_key->false]], [::Infosec::->[groups->false]], [::ADMIN_GRP::->[groups->false]], [::Kafka::->[auth_key->false]], [::PERSONAL_GRP::->[groups->false]] }
The above rule gets forbidden "by default". This means that no ACL block has matched the request, so ReadonlyREST's default policy of rejection takes effect.
Requests finished with INDEX NOT FOUND
This is an example of such request:
INDEX NOT FOUND req={ ID:501806845-1996085406#74, TYP:GetIndexRequest, CGR:N/A, USR:dev1 (attempted), BRS:true, KDX:null, ACT:indices:admin/get, OA:172.20.0.1/32, XFF:null, DA:172.20.0.2/32, IDX:nonexistent*, MET:GET, PTH:/nonexistent*/_alias/, CNT:<N/A>, HDR:Accept-Encoding=gzip,deflate, Authorization=<OMITTED>, Connection=Keep-Alive, Host=localhost:32773, User-Agent=Apache-HttpClient/4.5.2 (Java/1.8.0_162), content-length=0, HIS:[CONTAINER ADMIN-> RULES:[auth_key->false]], [dev1 indexes-> RULES:[auth_key->true, indices->false], RESOLVED:[user=dev1]], [dev2 aliases-> RULES:[auth_key->false]], [dev3 - no indices rule-> RULES:[auth_key->false]] }
The state above is only possible for read-only ES requests (ES requests which don't change ES cluster state) for a block containing an indices
rule. If all other rules within the block are matched, but only the indices
rule is mismatched, the final state of the block is forbidden due to an index not found.
ReadonlyREST can gather audit events that contain information regarding a request and its processing by the system, which can then be forwarded to predefined outputs. You can use the available information from the audit events to construct interesting visual representations, such as Kibana dashboards or any other visualization tool. For details see Audit configuration.
Follow these approaches until you find the solution to your problem
Scenario: you can't understand why your requests are being forbidden by ReadonlyREST (or viceversa)
Step 1: see what block/rule is matching Take the Elasticsearch log file, and grep the logs for ACT:
. This will show you the whole request context (including the action and indices fields) of the blocked requests. You can now tweak your ACL blocks to include that action.
Step 2: enable debug logs
Logs are good for auditing the activity on the REST API. You can configure them by editing $ES_PATH_CONF/config/logging.yml
(Elasticsearch 2.x) or $ES_PATH_CONF/config/log4j2.properties
file (Elasticsearch 5.x)
For example, you can enable the debug log globally by setting the rootLogger
to debug
.
rootLogger.level = debug
This is really useful especially to debug the activity of LDAP and other external connectors.
Trick: log requests to different files
Here is a log4j2.properties
snippet for ES 5.x that logs all the received requests as a new line in a separate file:
#Plugin readonly rest separate access logging file definition
appender.access_log_rolling.type = RollingFile
appender.access_log_rolling.name = access_log_rolling
appender.access_log_rolling.fileName = ${sys:es.logs}_access.log
appender.access_log_rolling.layout.pattern = [%d{ISO8601}][%-5p][%-25c] %marker%.-10000m%n
appender.access_log_rolling.layout.type = PatternLayout
appender.access_log_rolling.filePattern = ${sys:es.logs}_access-%d{yyyy-MM-dd}.log
appender.access_log_rolling.policies.type = Policies
appender.access_log_rolling.policies.time.type = TimeBasedTriggeringPolicy
appender.access_log_rolling.policies.time.interval = 1
appender.access_log_rolling.policies.time.modulate = true
logger.access_log_rolling.name = tech.beshu.ror
logger.access_log_rolling.level = info
logger.access_log_rolling.appenderRef.access_log_rolling.ref = access_log_rolling
logger.access_log_rolling.additivity = false
# exclude kibana, beat and logstash users as they generate too much noise
logger.access_log_rolling.filter.regex.type = RegexFilter
logger.access_log_rolling.filter.regex.regex = .*USR:(kibana|beat|logstash),.*
logger.access_log_rolling.filter.regex.onMatch = DENY
logger.access_log_rolling.filter.regex.onMismatch = ACCEPT
When the request does not match any of the ACL blocks or the request matches the block with the forbid
policy, the plugin rejects such requests with the 403
response code and forbidden
content.
You can change the content of the response as follows:
readonlyrest:
response_if_req_forbidden: Forbidden by ReadonlyREST ES plugin # custom response for all forbidden requests
access_control_rules:
- name: "Block 1"
type: # extended format for `type` property
policy: allow
indices: ["logstash-*"]
- name: "Block 2"
type: # extended format for `type` property
policy: forbid
# response returned when a request matches 'Block 2' (setting on the block level takes precedence over the global setting)
response_message: "You are unauthorized to access this resource"
indices: ["templates-*"]
Sometimes we want to make allow/forbid decisions according to the username associated to a HTTP request. The extraction of the user identity (username) can be done via HTTP Basic Auth (Authorization header) or delegated to a reverse proxy (see proxy_auth
rule).
The validation of the said credentials can be carried on locally with hard coded credential hashes (see auth_key_sha256
rule), via one or more LDAP server, or we can forward the Authorization header to an external web server and examine the HTTP status code (see external_authentication
).
Optionally we can introduce the notion of groups (see them as bags of users). The aim of having groups is to write a very specific block once, and being able to allow multiple usernames that satisfy the block.
Groups can be declared and associated to users statically in the readonlyrest.yml file. Alternatively, groups for a given username can be retrieved from an LDAP server or from a LDAP server, or a custom JSON/XML service.
You can mix and match the techniques to satisfy your requirements. For example, you can configure ReadonlyREST to:
- Extract the username from X-Forwarded-User
- Resolve groups associated to said user through a JSON microservice
Another example:
- Extract the username from Authorization header (HTTP Basic Auth)
- Validate said username's password via LDAP server
- resolve groups associated to the user from groups defined in readonlyrest.yml
More examples are shown below together with a sample configuration.
The groups
rule accepts a list of group IDs. This rule will match if the resolved username (i.e. via auth_key
) is associated with the given groups.
In this example, usernames alice
and claire
are statically associated with group IDs.
The username bob
is statically associated with structered groups(a special syntax for defining groups, which may be helpful in the case of the Enterprise Kibana plugin)
access_control_rules:
- name: Accept requests from users in group team1 on index1
type: allow # Optional, defaults to "allow" will omit now on.
groups: ["team1"]
indices: ["index1"]
- name: Accept requests from users in group team2 on index2
groups: ["team2"]
indices: ["index2"]
- name: Accept requests from users in groups team1 OR team2 on index3
groups: ["team1", "team2"]
indices: ["index3"]
- name: Accept requests from users in groups team4 OR team5 on index3
groups_or: ["team4", "team5"]
indices: ["index3"]
- name: Accept requests from users in groups team1 AND team2 on index3
groups_and: ["team1", "team2"]
indices: ["index3"]
users:
- username: "alice"
groups: ["team1"] # group id - a value that ROR operates in `groups`, `groups_or`, and `groups_and` rules
auth_key: alice:p455phrase
- username: "bob"
# structured group syntax, useful in case of tenancy selector in Kibana Enterprise plugin
groups:
- id: "team2" # group id
name: "Team 2" # group name - `Team 2` will be visible in the tenancy selector for the 'team2' group
- id: "team4" # group id
name: "Team 4" # group name - `Team 4` will be visible in the tenancy selector for the 'team4' group
auth_key: bob:s3cr37
- username: "claire"
groups: ["team1", "team5"] # group ids
auth_key_sha256: e0bba5fda92dbb0570fd2e729a3c8ed6b1d52b380581f32427a38e396ba28ec6 #claire:p455key
Example: rules are associated to groups (instead of users) and users-group association is declared separately later under users:
Sometimes we'd like to take advantage of groups (roles) existing in external systems (like LDAP). We can do that in users
section too. It's possible to map external groups to local ones. For details see External to local groups mapping .
ReadonlyREST can cooperate with services, that operates in case-insensitive way. For this case ROR has toggleable username case sensitivity option username_case_sensitivity
.
readonlyrest:
username_case_sensitivity: case_sensitive
By default, usernames are case-sensitive username_case_sensitivity: case_sensitive
. By setting username_case_sensitivity: case_insensitive
username comparison will be case-insensitive in any rule.
Anywhere in readonlyrest.yml
you can use the expression ${env:MY_ENV_VAR}
to replace in place the environmental variables. This is very useful for injecting credentials like LDAP bind passwords, especially in Docker.
For example, here we declare an environment variable, and we write ${env:LDAP_PASSWORD}
in our settings:
$ export LDAP_PASSWORD=S3cr3tP4ss
$ cat readonlyrest.yml
ldaps:
- name: ldap1
host: "ldap1.example.com"
port: 389
ssl_enabled: false
ssl_trust_all_certs: true
bind_dn: "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com"
bind_password: "${env:LDAP_PASSWORD}"
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"
And ReadonlyREST ES will load "S3cr3tP4ss" as bind_password
.
One of the neatest features in ReadonlyREST is that you can use dynamic variables inside most values of the following rules: data_streams
, indices
, users
, groups_or
, groups_and
, fields
, filter
, repositories
, hosts
, hosts_local
, snapshots
, response_fields
, uri_re
, x_forwarded_for
, hosts_local
, hosts
, kibana.index
, kibana.template_index
, kibana.metadata
. The variables are related to different contexts:
acl
- the context of data collected in authentication and authorization rules of the current block:@{acl:user}
gets replaced with the username of the successfully authenticated user. Using this variable is allowed only in blocks where one of the rules is an authentication rule of course it must be a rule different from the one containing the given variable.@{acl:current_group}
is the group ID explicitly requested by the tenancy selector in ReadonlyREST Enterprise plugin when using multi-tenancy.@{acl:available_groups}
gets replaced with available group IDs found in the authorization rule (because by default dynamic variables are resolved to a string, the variable resolved value will contain groups surrounded with double quotes and joined with a comma)
header
- the context of ES HTTP request headers@{header:<header_name>}
gets replaced with the value of the HTTP header with name<header_name>
included in the incoming request (useful when reverse proxies handle authentication)
jwt
- the context of JWT header value@{jwt:<json_path>}
get replaced with value (or values) found in the JWT claim under the given JSON path
A value resolved from a dynamic variable is a string. Some rules, like indices
one, have multivalue context (you can configure several indices names in it).
Let's assume we have a request with the header: APPS: app1,app2,app3
. Doing something like this:
indices: ["logstash_@{header:apps}"]
We should expect it to be resolved to:
indices: ["logstash_app1,app2,app3"]
for this particular request. No, it wouldn't be helpful at all.
But there is an explode
function for dynamic variables. Doing:
indices: ["logstash_@explode{header:apps}"]
we should get:
indices: ["logstash_app1", "logstash_app2", "logstash_app3"]
which looks more useful!
So, as we've seen, the explode
attribute of a dynamic variable rule can be used to split a string with comma-separated values into an array of strings. But it can only be used in a rule with multi value context.
You can let users authenticate externally, i.e. via LDAP, and use their user name string inside the indices
rule.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Users can see only their logstash indices" # i.e. alice can see alice_logstash-20170922
ldap_authentication:
name: "myLDAP"
indices: ["@{acl:user}_logstash-*"]
# LDAP connector settings omitted, see LDAP section below..
You can let users authorize externally, i.e. via LDAP, and use their group strings inside the indices
rule.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Users can see only logstash indices for their departments" # i.e. alice belongs to 'dev' and 'ops' department groups, so she can see dev_logstash-20170922, ops_logstash-20170922
ldap_auth:
name: "myLDAP"
groups: ["dev", "ops", "qa"]
indices: ["@explode{acl:available_groups}_logstash-*"] # i.e when available_groups=[dev, ops] we will get indices: ["dev_logstash-*", "ops_logstash-*"]
# LDAP connector settings omitted, see LDAP section below..
You can let users authorize externally, i.e. via LDAP, and use their group strings inside the filter
rule.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Users can only see documents related to their departments" # i.e. alice belongs to 'dev' and 'ops' department groups, so she can see documents where "department" field is equal 'dev' or 'ops'
ldap_auth:
name: "myLDAP"
groups: ["dev", "ops", "qa"]
filter: '{ "terms": { "department": [@{acl:available_groups}] }}' # i.e. from available_groups=[dev, ops] we will get filter: '{ "terms": { "department": ["dev","ops"] }}'
indices: ["logstash-*"]
# LDAP connector settings omitted, see LDAP section below..
You can let users authorize externally, i.e. via LDAP, and use their group inside the uri_re
rule.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Users can access uri with value containing user's current group, i.e. user with group 'g1' can access: '/path/g1/some_thing'"
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap1"
groups: ["g1", "g2", "g3"]
uri_re: ["^/path/@{acl:current_group}/.*"]
# LDAP connector settings omitted, see LDAP section below..
Imagine that we delegate authentication to a reverse proxy, so we know that only authenticated users will ever reach Elasticsearch. We can tell the reverse proxy (i.e. Nginx) to inject a header called x-nginx-user
containing the username.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "Identify a personal kibana index where each user is supposed to save their dashboards"
kibana:
access: rw
index: ".kibana_@{header:x-nginx-user}"
The JWT token is an authentication string passed generally as a header or a query parameter to the web browser. If you squint, you can see it's a concatenation of three base64 encoded strings. If you base64 decode the middle string, you can see the "claims object". That is the object containing the current user's metadata.
Here is an example of JWT claims object.
{
"user": "jdoe",
"display_name": "John Doe",
"department": "infosec",
"allowedIndices": ["x", "y"]
}
Here follow some examples of how to use JWT claims as dynamic variables in ReadonlyREST ACL blocks, notice the "jwt:" prefix:
# Using JWT claims as dynamic variables
indices: [ "idx_@{jwt:department}", "idx_other" ]
# claims = { "user": "u1", "department": "infosec"}
# -> indices: ["idx_infosec", "idx_other"]
# Using nested values in JWT using JSONPATH as dynamic variables
indices: [ "idx_@{jwt:jsonpath.to.department}", "idx_other"]
# claims = { "jsonpath": {"to": { "department": "infosec" }}}
# -> indices: ["idx_infosec", "idx_other"]
# Referencing array-typed values from JWT claims will expand in a list of strings
indices: [ "idx_@explode{jwt:allowedIndices}", "idx_other"]
# claims = {"username": "u1", "allowedIndices": ["x", "y"] }
# -> indices: ["idx_x", "idx_y", "idx_other"]
# Explode operator will generate an array of strings from a comma-separated string
indices: ["logstash_@explode{x-indices_csv_string}*", "idx_other"]
# HTTP Headers: [{ "x-indices_csv_string": "a,b"}]
# -> indices: ["logstash_a*", "logstash_b*", "idx_other"]
A value resolved from a variable may not be valid in some contexts. Sometimes, the value from the variable needs some preprocessing before usage. For example, a HTTP header value containing the uppercase characters is a wrong candidate for the index name because it has to be a lowercase string. We introduced variable functions to overcome these limitations. They allow modification of the variable values during the variable resolution (both, static and dynamic variables are supported).
With their help, you can use the HTTP header X-Forwarded-User: James
containing uppercase characters in the indices
rule:
indices: [ 'index_@{header:x-forwarded-user}#{to_lowercase}' ]
# @{header:x-forwarded-user} is replaced by HTTP header value 'James', and then the given function chain (function `to_lowercase` converting all characters to lowercase) is applied to the header value
which resolves to:
indices: [ 'index_james' ]
In general, functions syntax is as follows:
function_name("arg1","arg2")
function_name
- a function that you want to apply(...)
- function call parentheses (they may be omitted when the function has no args)arg1
,arg2
- arguments passed to function. They should be surrounded by"
. If your argument contains a special character ("
or}
), you can escape it with a\
, e.g. (function_a("\}")
)
You can chain functions with the .
operator (functions are applied in order from left to right):
function_a("arg1").function_b.function_c("arg1")
To apply functions to the variable, you need to use the #
operator and enter your code in { }
braces:
@{--variable-definition--}#{--functions-chain--}
# Using JWT claims as dynamic variables with variable function
indices: [ "idx_@{jwt:department}#{to_lowercase}", "idx_other" ]
# claims = { "user": "u1", "department": "Infosec"}
# -> indices: ["idx_infosec", "idx_other"]
Currently, we support functions like this:
-
replace_all(regex,replacement)
- Replaces each substring of the variable string that matches the given regular expression with the given replacement.Params:
regex
- the regular expression to which the variable string is to be matchedreplacement
- the string to be substituted for each match
Usage:
indices: [ 'index_@{header:app}#{replace_all("team","group")}' ]
-
replace_first(regex,replacement)
- Replaces the first substring of the variable string that matches the given regular expression with the given replacement.Params:
regex
- the regular expression to which the variable string is to be matchedreplacement
- the string to be substituted for each match
Usage example:
indices: [ 'index_@{header:app}#{replace_first("^team","group")}' ]
-
to_lowercase
- Converts all characters in the variable string to lower caseUsage example:
indices: [ 'index_@{header:app}#{to_lowercase}' ]
-
to_uppercase
- Converts all characters in the variable string to upper case Usage example:groups: [ 'x1', '@{header:group}#{to_uppercase}' ]
💡 Didn't find the function you are looking for?
We can easily extend the function list. If you need any new function/mechanism that cannot be obtained using the supported functions, let us know about it in our forum. We will consider adding the proper implementation.
Sometimes, the function chain may be very complex or occur multiple times in ACL.
In this case, you can use a function aliases
to simplify configuration management.
The function alias allows you to export your function chain outside the ACL.
Then you can substitute your function via alias func(alias_name)
.
Let's assume that we have the following configuration, and we want to introduce some function aliases:
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: Alice
indices: ['index_@{header:group}#{to_lowercase.replace_all("\\d","x")}']
auth_key: alice:p455phrase
- name: Bob
indices: ['index_@{header:group}#{to_lowercase.replace_all("\\d","x").replace_first("^team","")}']
auth_key: bob:s3cr37
You can define function aliases in the readonlyrest.variables_function_aliases
section and substitute functions code with func(alias)
:
readonlyrest:
variables_function_aliases:
- custom_replace: 'to_lowercase.replace_all("\\d","x")' # convert to lower case and replace digits with x
- skip_team_prefix: 'replace_first("^team","")'
access_control_rules:
- name: Alice
indices: ['index_@{header:group}#{func(custom_replace)}']
auth_key: alice:p455phrase
- name: Bob
indices: ['index_@{header:group}#{func(custom_replace).func(skip_team_prefix)}']
auth_key: bob:s3cr37
The authentication and authorization rules for LDAP (ldap_auth
, ldap_authentication
, ldap_authorization
) defined in the rules section, always need to contain a reference by name to one LDAP connector. One or more LDAP connectors need to be defined in the section "ldaps" of the ACL.
If you would like to experiment with LDAP and need a development server, you can stand up an OpenLDAP server configuring it using our schema file, which can be found in our tests).
There are also plenty of technical settings which can be useful:
- an LDAP server address:
- single host:
host
(String, required) - LDAP server addressport
(Integer, optional, default:389
) - LDAP server portssl_enabled
(Boolean, optional, default:true
) - enables or disables SSL for LDAP connection
- several hosts:
hosts
(List, required) - list of LDAP server addresses. The address should look like thisldap://[HOST]:[PORT]
or/andldaps://[HOST]:[PORT]
ha
(enum: [FAILOVER
,ROUND_ROBIN
], optional, default:FAILOVER
) - provides high availability strategy for LDAP
- auto-discovery:
server_discovery
(Boolean|YAML object, optional, default:false
) - for details see LDAP server discovery section
- single host:
connection_pool_size
(Integer, optional, default:30
) - indicates how many connections LDAP connector should create to LDAP serverconnection_timeout
(Duration, optional, default:10 sec
) - instructs connector how long it should wait for the connection to LDAP serverrequest_timeout
(Duration, optional, default:10 sec
) - instructs connector how long it should wait for receiving a whole response from LDAP serverssl_trust_all_certs
(Boolean, optional, default:false
) - if it is set totrue
, untrusted certificates will be acceptedignore_ldap_connectivity_problems
(Boolean, optional, default:false
) - when it is set totrue
, it allows ROR to function even when LDAP server is unreachable. Rules using unreachable LDAP servers won't match. By default, ROR starts only after it's able to connect to each servercache_ttl
(Duration, optional, default:0 sec
) - tells how long LDAP connector should cache queries results (for default see caching section)circuit_breaker
(YAML object, optional, default:max_retries: 10
,reset_duration: 10 sec
) - for details see circuit breaker section
Usually, we would like to configure three main things for defining the way LDAP users and groups are queried:
-
a way to authenticate client (LDAP binding; used by all LDAP rules):
bind_dn
(string, optional, default: [not present]) - a username used to connect to the LDAP service. We can skip this setting when our LDAP service allows for anonymous bindingbind_password
(string, optional, default: [not present]) - a password used to connect to the LDAP service. We can skip this setting when our LDAP service allows for anonymous binding
-
a way to search users. In ROR it can be done using the following YAML keys (under the
users
section) (used by all LDAP rules):search_user_base_DN
(string, required) - should refer to the base Distinguished Name of the users to be authenticateduser_id_attribute
(string, optional, default:uid
) - should refer to a unique ID for the user within the base DNskip_user_search
(boolean, optional, default:false
) - when you setuser_id_attribute: "cn"
you may want to skip the user search. This optimizes the authentication, which is done in two steps (searching for a user DN and authenticating the user with a given DN). If you configure it to betrue
, the user's DN will becn={user_login},{search_user_base_DN}
.
-
a way to search user groups (NOT used by
ldap_authentication
rule). You can configure all properties under thegroups
section in LDAP connector configuration.In ROR, depending on LDAP schema, a relation between users and groups can be defined in:
- Group entry - it has an attribute that refers to User entries (
mode: search_groups_in_group_entries
this is the default):search_groups_base_DN
(required) - should refer to the base Distinguished ID of the groups to which these users may belonggroup_id_attribute
(string, optional, default:cn
) - is the LDAP group object attribute that contains the IDs of the ROR groupsgroup_name_attribute
(string, optional, default: group_id_attribute) - is the LDAP group object attribute that contains the name of the ROR groupsunique_member_attribute
(string, optional, default:uniqueMember
) - is the LDAP group object attribute that contains the IDs of the ROR groupsgroup_search_filter
(string, optional, default:(cn=*)
) - is the LDAP search filter (or filters) to limit the user groups returned by LDAP. By default, this filter will be joined (with&
) withunique_member_attribute=user_dn
filter resulting in this LDAP search filter:(&YOUR_GROUP_SEARCH_FILTER(unique_member_attribute=user_dn))
.group_attribute_is_dn
(boolean, optional, default:true
) -- when
true
the search filter will look like that:(&YOUR_GROUP_SEARCH_FILTER(unique_member_attribute={USER_DN}))
- then
false
the search filer will look like that:(&YOUR_GROUP_SEARCH_FILTER(unique_member_attribute={USER_ID_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE}))
- when
server_side_groups_filtering
(boolean, optional, default:false
) - by default ROR's LDAP connector asks for all groups of the given user. The group filtering is done on ROR's side. It allows ROR to cache them efficiently. But in some cases (e.g. when the user has hundreds of groups), it's better to filter them on the LDAP server side. If this setting istrue
, LDAP will only be queried for a certain subset of the user groups (defined by thegroups_or
/groups_and
subrule of theldap_authorization
/ldap_auth
rule). Note, however, that ONLY the returned subset of the user's groups is cached. See groups caching details for a deep explanation.nested_groups_depth
(positive int, optional, no default) - it defines how deep ROR should ask LDAP to extract the nested LDAP groups. See the nested groups support section for details.
- User entry - it has an attribute that refers to Group entries (
mode: search_groups_in_user_entries
has to be set to use this strategy):search_groups_base_DN
(string, required) - should refer to the base Distinguished ID of the groups to which these users may belonggroup_id_attribute
(string, optional, default:cn
) - is the LDAP group object attribute that contains the IDs of the ROR groupsgroups_from_user_attribute
(string, optional, default:memberOf
) - is the LDAP user object attribute that contains the names of the ROR groupsgroup_search_filter
(string, optional, default:(objectClass=*)
) is the LDAP search filter (or filters) to limit the user groups returned by LDAPnested_groups_depth
(positive int, optional, no default) - it defines how deep ROR should ask LDAP to extract the nested LDAP groups. When this setting is configured, ROR needs to know what group's attribute holds the parent group ID - it can be set usingunique_member_attribute
(the default is theuniqueMember
value). See the nested groups support section for details.
- Group entry - it has an attribute that refers to User entries (
Examples:
group_search_filter: "(objectClass=group)"
group_search_filter: "(objectClass=group)(cn=application*)"
group_search_filter: "(cn=*)" # basically no group filtering
Too many calls made by ROR to our LDAP service can sometimes be problematic (eg. when one LDAP connector is used in many rules). The problem can be simply solved by using caching functionality. Caching can be configured per LDAP connector or per LDAP rule (see ldap_auth
, ldap_authentication
, ldap_authorization
rules). By default cache is disabled. We can enable it by setting cache_ttl
> 0 sec
. In the cache will be stored only results of successful requests - info about authentication results and/or returned LDAP groups for the given credentials. When LDAP connector level cache is used any rule that uses the connector can take advantage of cached results. When we configure cache_ttl
at the LDAP rule level, the results of LDAP calls made by the rule will be stored in the cache. Other LDAP rules won't have access to this cache. See caching details for deep explanation.
The LDAP connector is equipped by default with a circuit breaker functionality. The circuit breaker can disable the connector from sending new requests to the server when it doesn't respond properly. After receiving a configurable number of failed responses in a row, the circuit breaker feature disables sending any new requests by terminating them immediately with an exception. After a configurable amount of time, the circuit breaker feature allows one request to pass again. If it succeeds, the connector goes back to normal operation. If not, a test request is sent again after a configurable amount of time. A general description of the concept could be found on wiki and more about specific implementation could be found in library documentation.
The circuit breaker feature can be customized to adapt to specific needs using the following configuration parameters:
max_retries
is the number of failed responses in a row that will trigger the circuit breaker.reset_duration
defines how long the circuit breaker feature will block the incoming requests before starting to send one test request. to the LDAP server.
The LDAP connector can get all LDAP hostnames from the DNS server rather than from the configuration file. By default _ldap._tcp
SRV records are used for that, but any other SRV record can be configured.
The simplest configuration example of an LDAP connector instance using server discovery is:
- name: ldap
server_discovery: true
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example2,dc=com"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example2,dc=com"
This configuration is using the system DNS to fetch all the _ldap._tcp
SRV records which are expected to contain the hostname and port of all the LDAP servers we should connect to. Each SRV record also has priority and weight assigned to it which determine the order in which they should be contacted. Records with a lower priority value will be used before those with a higher priority value. The weight will be used if there are multiple service records with the same priority, and it controls how likely each record is to be chosen. A record with a weight of 2 is twice as likely to be chosen as a record with the same priority and a weight of 1.
The server discovery mechanism can be optionally configured further, by adding a few more configuration parameters, all of which are optional:
record_name
- DNS SRV record name. By default it's_ldap._tcp
, but could be_ldap._tcp.domainname
or any custom value.dns_url
- Address of non-default DNS server in formdns://IP[:PORT]
. By default, the system DNS is used.ttl
- DNS cache timeout. Specifies how long values from DNS will be kept in the cache. Default is 1h.use_ssl
- Usetrue
when SSL should be used for LDAP connections. Default isfalse
which means that SSL won't be used.
Example:
- name: ldap
server_discovery:
record_name: "_ldap._tcp.example.com"
dns_url: "dns://192.168.1.100"
ttl: "3 hours"
use_ssl: true
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example2,dc=com"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example2,dc=com"
Let's imagine we have the following groups in LDAP:
employees
it
developers
sales
managers
And there is John Dev
who is assigned to developers
groups and Alize Man
whos group is managers
.
Moreover, we know that:
- to
it
group belongs all users who aredevelopers
- to
sales
group belongs all users who aremanagers
- to
employees
groups belongs all users who are fromit
orsales
The groups configuration like the above, in ROR, we call nested LDAP groups.
By default, when ROR searches for eg. John Dev
's groups, it is going to get the developers
group only. But taking into consideration the nested groups configuration, we know that John Dev
belongs to the following groups: developers
, it
& employees
. Sometimes it'd be nice to have them all available in ROR's LDAP authorization rule.
ROR extracts nested groups by making additional search queries to LDAP. It asks LDAP: tell me which groups developers
belongs to?. LDAP should return: it
. Then ROR asks again: so, tell me which groups it
belongs to?. LDAP answers: employees
. And again, ROR asks: Tell me which groups empoyees
belongs to?. LDAP should say: no groups found. And this is the point where ROR stops. ROR did additional 3 queries to LDAP to establish that John Dev
belongs additionally to it
and employees
group.
As you probably noticed, enabling nested groups extraction can be costly. ROR obviously tries to do its best to reduce the cost eg. by caching (if cache is enabled) or extracting each unique group always only once during the groups call handling. To reduce the cost more, you can define the depth of the extraction by providing nested_groups_depth
(the presence of the setting enables the feature, so you have to configure it to enable the nested groups extraction).
Let's say we configured it like that: nested_groups_depth: 1
. In the example above ROR asks only once: tell me which groups developers
belongs to?. After the LDAP's response: it
there won't be any more queries. That's because of the depth equaled 1.
In this example, users' credentials are validated via LDAP. The groups associated with each validated user, are resolved using the same LDAP server.
Simpler: authentication and authorization in one rule
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: Accept requests from users in group team1 on index1
type: allow # Optional, defaults to "allow", will omit from now on.
ldap_auth:
name: "ldap1" # ldap name from below 'ldaps' section
groups: ["g1", "g2"] # group within 'ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com'
indices: ["index1"]
- name: Accept requests from users in group team2 on index2
ldap_auth:
name: "ldap2"
groups: ["g3"]
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
indices: ["index2"]
ldaps:
- name: ldap1
host: "ldap1.example.com"
port: 389
ssl_enabled: false
ssl_trust_all_certs: true
ignore_ldap_connectivity_problems: true
bind_dn: "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com"
bind_password: "password"
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"
user_id_attribute: "uid"
groups:
mode: 'search_groups_in_group_entries' # available options: 'search_groups_in_group_entries' (default), 'search_groups_in_user_entries'
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com"
unique_member_attribute: "uniqueMember"
group_search_filter: "(objectClass=group)(cn=application*)"
group_id_attribute: "cn"
connection_pool_size: 20
connection_timeout: 1s
request_timeout: 2s
cache_ttl: 60s
circuit_breaker:
max_retries: 2
reset_duration: 5s
# High availability LDAP settings (using "hosts", rather than "host")
- name: ldap2
hosts:
- "ldaps://ssl-ldap2.foo.com:636"
- "ldaps://ssl-ldap3.foo.com:636"
ha: "ROUND_ROBIN"
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example2,dc=com"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example2,dc=com"
# Server discovery variant
- name: ldap3
server_discovery: true
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example2,dc=com"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example2,dc=com"
Advanced: authentication and authorization in separate rules
readonlyrest:
enable: true
response_if_req_forbidden: Forbidden by ReadonlyREST ES plugin
access_control_rules:
- name: Accept requests to index1 from users with valid LDAP credentials, belonging to LDAP group 'team1'
ldap_authentication: "ldap1"
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap1" # ldap name from 'ldaps' section
groups: ["g1", "g2"] # group within 'ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com'
indices: ["index1"]
- name: Accept requests to index2 from users with valid LDAP credentials, belonging to LDAP group 'team2'
ldap_authentication:
name: "ldap2"
cache_ttl: 60s
ldap_authorization:
name: "ldap2"
groups: ["g3"]
cache_ttl: 60s
indices: ["index2"]
ldaps:
- name: ldap1
host: "ldap1.example.com"
port: 389
ssl_enabled: false
ssl_trust_all_certs: true
ignore_ldap_connectivity_problems: true
bind_dn: "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com"
bind_password: "password"
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"
user_id_attribute: "uid"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com"
unique_member_attribute: "uniqueMember"
connection_pool_size: 20
connection_timeout: 1s
request_timeout: 2s
cache_ttl: 60s
# High availability LDAP settings (using "hosts", rather than "host")
- name: ldap2
hosts:
- "ldaps://ssl-ldap2.foo.com:636"
- "ldaps://ssl-ldap3.foo.com:636"
ha: "ROUND_ROBIN"
users:
search_user_base_DN: "ou=People,dc=example2,dc=com"
groups:
search_groups_base_DN: "ou=Groups,dc=example2,dc=com"
ReadonlyREST will forward the received Authorization
header to a website of choice and evaluate the returned HTTP status code to verify the provided credentials. This is useful if you already have a web server with all the credentials configured and the credentials are passed over the Authorization
header.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "::Tweets::"
methods: GET
indices: ["twitter"]
external_authentication: "ext1"
- name: "::Facebook posts::"
methods: GET
indices: ["facebook"]
external_authentication:
service: "ext2"
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
external_authentication_service_configs:
- name: "ext1"
authentication_endpoint: "http://external-website1:8080/auth1"
success_status_code: 200
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
http_connection_settings:
validate: false # SSL certificate validation (default to true)
connection_timeout_in_sec: 1 # default 2
socket_timeout_in_sec: 2 # default 5
connection_request_timeout_in_sec: 1 # default 5
connection_pool_size: 20 # default 30
- name: "ext2"
authentication_endpoint: "http://external-website2:8080/auth2"
success_status_code: 204
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
To define an external authentication service the user should specify:
name
for service (then this name is used as id inservice
attribute ofexternal_authentication
rule)authentication_endpoint
(GET request)success_status_code
- authentication response success status code
Cache can be defined at the service level or/and at the rule level. In the example, both are shown, but you might opt for setting up either.
This external authorization connector makes it possible to resolve to what groups a users belong, using an external JSON or XML service.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: "::Tweets::"
methods: GET
indices: ["twitter"]
proxy_auth:
proxy_auth_config: "proxy1"
users: ["*"]
groups_provider_authorization:
user_groups_provider: "GroupsService"
groups: ["group3"]
- name: "::Facebook posts::"
methods: GET
indices: ["facebook"]
proxy_auth:
proxy_auth_config: "proxy1"
users: ["*"]
groups_provider_authorization:
user_groups_provider: "GroupsService"
groups: ["group1"]
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
proxy_auth_configs:
- name: "proxy1"
user_id_header: "X-Auth-Token" # default X-Forwarded-User
user_groups_providers:
- name: GroupsService
groups_endpoint: "http://localhost:8080/groups"
auth_token_name: "token"
auth_token_passed_as: QUERY_PARAM # HEADER OR QUERY_PARAM
response_groups_ids_json_path: "$..groups[?(@.id)].id" # JSON-path style, see https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath
response_groups_names_json_path: "$..groups[?(@.name)].name" # optional, JSON-path style, see https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath
cache_ttl_in_sec: 60
http_connection_settings:
connection_timeout_in_sec: 1 # default 2
socket_timeout_in_sec: 2 # default 5
connection_request_timeout_in_sec: 2 # default 5
connection_pool_size: 20 # default 30
In example above, a user is authenticated by reverse proxy and then external service is asked for groups for that user. If groups returned by the service contain any group declared in groups
list, user is authorized and rule matches.
Also in this rule, the groups
clause can be replaced by group_and
to require the user must belong to all the listed groups:
groups_provider_authorization:
user_groups_provider: "GroupsService"
groups_and: ["group1", "group2"] # match when user belongs to ALL listed groups
To define user groups provider you should specify:
name
- (string, required) - identifier of the service which needs to be passed in thegroups_provider_authorization
rule (user_groups_provider
attribute)groups_endpoint
- (string, required) - service with groups endpointauth_token_name
- (string, required) - user identifier will be passed with this nameauth_token_passed_as
- (string, required, can be one ofHEADER
orQUERY_PARAM
) - the way how user identifier is passed to the servicehttp_method
- (string, optional, can be one ofGET
(default),POST
) - HTTP method used to send requestresponse_group_ids_json_path
,response_groups_json_path
(string, required) - response can be unrestricted, but you have to specify JSON Path for group ID listresponse_group_names_json_path
(string, optional, default:response_group_ids_json_path
)- JSON Path for groups name list (both arrays, available atresponse_group_ids_json_path
andresponse_group_names_json_path
, have to have the same length and have the same order)
As usual, the cache behaviour can be defined at service level or/and at rule level.
The information about the username can be extracted from the "claims" inside a JSON Web Token. Here is an example.
readonlyrest:
access_control_rules:
- name: Valid JWT token with a viewer group
kibana:
access: ro
jwt_auth:
name: "jwt_provider_1"
groups: ["viewer"]
- name: Valid JWT token with a writer group
kibana:
access: rw
jwt_auth:
name: "jwt_provider_1"
groups: ["writer"]
- name: Valid JWT token with a viewer and writer groups
kibana:
access: rw
jwt_auth:
name: "jwt_provider_1"
groups_and: ["writer", "viewer"]
jwt:
- name: jwt_provider_1
signature_algo: HMAC # can be NONE, RSA, HMAC (default), and EC
signature_key: "your_signature_min_256_chars"
user_claim: email
group_ids_claim: resource_access.client_app.group_ids # JSON-path style, see https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath
group_names_claim: resource_access.client_app.group_names # optional, JSON-path style, see https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath
header_name: Authorization
You can verify groups assigned to the user with the groups
field. The rule matches when the user belongs to at least one of the configured groups
(OR logic). Alternatively, groups_and
matches when the user belongs to all given groups (AND logic).
To define JWT provider, you need to provide:
-
name
- (string, required) - identifier of the JWT provider, which needs to be passed in thejwt_auth
rule -
user_claim
- (string, optional) - indicates which field in the JSON will be interpreted as the username. To define the claim path, use JSON-path syntax. -
group_ids_claim
(string, optional) - indicates which field in the JSON will be interpreted as the group ID. To define the claim path, use JSON-path syntax. -
group_names_claim
(string, optional, defaults togroup_ids_claim
) - indicates which field in the JSON will be interpreted as the group name. To define the claim path, use JSON-path syntax. -
header_name
(string, optional, defaults toAuthorization
) - HTTP header name carrying the JWT Token, can be used if we expect the JWT Token in a custom header (i.e. Google Cloud IAP signed headers). -
signature_key
(string, required) - shared secret between the issuer of the JWT and ReadonlyREST. It is used to verify the cryptographical "paternity" of the message. -
signature_algo
(string, optional, can be one ofNONE
,RSA
,HMAC
(default), andEC
) - indicates the family of cryptographic algorithms used to validate the JWT.
Accepted signature_algo values
The value of this configuration represents the cryptographic family of the JWT protocol. Use the below table to tell what value you should configure, given a JWT token sample. You can decode sample JWT token using an online tool.
Algorithm declared in JWT token | signature_algo value |
---|---|
NONE | None |
HS256 | HMAC |
HS384 | HMAC |
HS512 | HMAC |
RS256 | RSA |
RS384 | RSA |
RS512 | RSA |
PS256 | RSA |
PS384 | RSA |
PS512 | RSA |
ES256 | EC |
ES384 | EC |
ES512 | EC |
ReadonlyREST Free (Elasticsearch plugin) is released under the GPLv3 license. For what this kind of software concerns, this is identical to GPLv2, that is, you can treat ReadonlyREST as you would treat Linux code. The big difference from Linux is that here you can ask for a commercial license and stop thinking about legal implications.
Here is a practical summary of what dealing with GPLv3 means:
-
Distribute for free or commercially a version (partial or total) of this software (along with its license and attributions) as part of a product or solution that is also released under GPL-compatible license. Please notify us if you do so.
-
Use a modified version internally to your company without making your changes available under the GPLv3 license.
-
Distribute for free or commercially a modified version (partial or total) of this software, provided that the source is contributed back as pull request to
the original project or publicly made available under the GPLv3 or compatible license.
- Sell or give away a modified version of the plugin (or parts of it, or any derived work) without publishing the modified source under GPLv3 compatible licenses.
- Modify the code for a paying client without immediately contributing your changes back to this project's GitHub as a pull request, or alternatively publicly release said fork under GPLv3 or compatible license.
1. Q: I sell a proprietary software solution that already includes many other OSS components (i.e. Elasticsearch). Can I bundle also ReadonlyREST into it?
A: No, GPLv3 does not allow it. But hey, no problem, just go for the Enterprise subscription.
2. Q: I have a SaaS and we want to use a version of ReadonlyREST for Elasticsearch (as is, or modified), do I need a commercial license?
A: No, you don't. Go for it! However if you are using Kibana, consider the Enterprise offer which includes multi-tenancy.
3. Q: I'm a consultant and I will charge my customer for modifying this software and they will not sell it as a product or part of their product.
A: This is fine with GPLv3.
Please don't hesitate to contact us for a re-licensed copy of this source. Your success is what makes this project worthwhile, don't let legal issues slow you down.
See commercial license FAQ page for more information.