Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Auto-label function systems with SystemTypeIdLabel #4224
[Merged by Bors] - Auto-label function systems with SystemTypeIdLabel #4224
Changes from all commits
e8a5c6a
649987b
76ca7f6
a964e8e
ca7c674
c39276e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This couldn't be
derive(Default)
because of the type parameter bounds, but should it still beDefault
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. This would enable people to construct these labels without an instance to a system type. Maybe thats good. Is there a use case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be useful if you wanted to initialize an array of these things, especially if we also impl'd Copy. I'm not immediately sure why you'd want to do that though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haha I'm impatient, so I'm just going to merge this now. I'm happy to add this if we decide its needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a short doc comment stating this is used for system -> SystemLabel coercion plus a pointer to SystemLabel which illustrates the ergonomics.
It'd also stave off the perpetually missing
#[forbid(missing_docs)]
for the crate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll record that I'm still not super happy with this being a method, but I don't think that's changing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I'm not (yet) convinced. I think there are good reasons to make "manually retrieving the label from a system instance" a part of our api. We don't abstract out "other" labels and we let those instances float around. Why abstract out these?
I'm down to continue discussing, but I dont want to block on this.