-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MISC] Update guidelines on file formats and multidimensional arrays - for derivatives #1614
Open
CPernet
wants to merge
8
commits into
bids-standard:master
Choose a base branch
from
CPernet:file-formats
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5061f88
update release protocol
sappelhoff 7dc027d
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specif…
sappelhoff 419aed4
guideline updates
CPernet 0750685
rephrasings, adding links, linebreaks, bringing back old language
sappelhoff f1af753
Merge branch 'master' into file-formats
CPernet 9c3d211
Merge branch 'bids-standard:master' into file-formats
CPernet 63e33cc
add example
CPernet 65c8ce7
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for taking so long to review this. I think this is roughly what's being proposed here (using raw data as an example):
This repackaging of BIDS data inside a hierarchical data format feels very radical and will require tools to be rewritten to understand entire datasets, as opposed to specific derivative files. I suspect that this is not what was actually intended, so I think it would be very helpful to see examples of the intent.
I see basically two cases that should be addressed:
.nwb
,.snirf
) or Zarr (.ome.zarr
). When considering options for new formats, these should be prioritized to reduce the expansion of necessary tooling..tsv
files. Where TSV files with a header row represent a collection of named 1D arrays, an HDF5/Zarr container contains named N-D arrays that are not constrained to have a common shape. For simplicity, it is encouraged to use a collection of names at the root, which are to be described in a sidecar JSON. For example, to output raw model parameters for an undefined model, one might use:And the JSON file would contain:
If this was the intent, I'm happy to propose alternative text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure to understand your example, those arrays were meant for 'stuff' that does not fit the current formats - why one would start allowing packing current data, might be BIDS 2.0. but seems to radical at this stage. ??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The initial example is the best I can make of the current text. I don't know what is being described here.