Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for static SIP Pins #5068

Open
wants to merge 121 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SebastianAppDev
Copy link
Contributor

Dear bigbluebutton/greenlight team,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to propose the introduction of a new feature in the upcoming version 3 of the greenlight platform.

Specifically, I would like to suggest the implementation of static SIP pins for conference participants. Currently, participants are assigned a dynamic SIP pin upon entering a conference, which changes each time they join a new session. While this system works well for many users, it can be inconvenient for others who may need to use the same SIP pin consistently or want to share the SIP pin before starting a meeting.

By introducing static SIP pins, we can provide a more flexible and reliable system for users who require a consistent pin for their meetings. This feature would allow users to set a unique, static SIP pin that they can use for all future conferences, making it easier for them to join meetings quickly and efficiently.

A similar request for this feature was made for v2. (#2739)

I believe that this feature would greatly enhance the user experience and functionality of greenlight, and I am excited to contribute to its development. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this proposal and implementation.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Sebastian

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 29, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
5.6% 5.6% Duplication

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 30, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
2.4% 2.4% Duplication

@ThomasAppDev
Copy link

We are really looking forward to this feature - can we do something to / what is needed for it to be merged?

@M-Schiborr
Copy link

We are very interested in this feature, are there any news if and when it will be merged?

@scouillard
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
Thank you so much for the work on Greenlight - we are also very excited for this feature!
However, we are focusing on stabilising Greenlight before we start working on improvements and new features.
We are getting close to where we want to be and we will be adding the dial-up feature as soon as possible.
Thank you again.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.3% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@Michael1972
Copy link

@SebastianAppDev sorry if this question shouldn't be in right place here, I'm a beginner with BBB and Greenlight. I would like to test your implementation. What do I have to do to install it?

SebastianAppDev added a commit to SebastianAppDev/greenlight that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2024
SebastianAppDev added a commit to SebastianAppDev/greenlight that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.3% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 18, 2024

@cwaidelich
Copy link

Hi,
is there anything I can do to help get this to v3?
Again, we are using this feature together with #5102 with 250 active users daily in a 1200 big company.

Let me know,
Chris

@SebastianAppDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@farhatahmad Do you have any idea why the rspec test fails? I cannot figure it out. On my machine the results are different.

Also if anyone else has an idea any help would be greatly appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.