Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] Feature constructor did not restore features when loading from saved workflow #2996

Merged

Conversation

astaric
Copy link
Member

@astaric astaric commented Apr 13, 2018

Issue

When feature expression in feature constructor widget contained anything else than simple variable names, they were not restored when opening a saved workflow.

Description of changes

Update matching logic to support variable names containing special characters and usage of builtin functions.

Includes
  • Code changes
  • Tests
  • Documentation

Update context matching to correctly match expressions that contain
builtin functions and/or variables with comlpex names.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 13, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2996 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2996      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.88%   81.89%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         329      329              
  Lines       56867    56879      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        46564    46583      +19     
+ Misses      10303    10296       -7

@lanzagar lanzagar changed the title [FIX] Feature constructor does not restore features when loading from saved workflow [FIX] Feature constructor did not restore features when loading from saved workflow May 11, 2018
@lanzagar lanzagar merged commit 551e531 into biolab:master May 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants