-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bip-0011/12 - fixed broken implementation url #1351
Merged
luke-jr
merged 2 commits into
bitcoin:master
from
russeree:bip12-Implementation-url-fix
Sep 30, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an old commit. Why not the most recent 77f21f1583deb89bf3fffe80fe9b181fedb1dd60?
Or perhaps link https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/669/files ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated Commit
Ack'd to fixing with the more modern commit.
The reason I chose the commit was it was referenced as the OP_EVAL implementation by Gavin Andresen in bip11/12 and would match the branch at the time the BIP was submitted. Though yours is newer and would represent the final state of the branch before the branch was removed.
My method to determine the location of the deleted branch was to run
git log --all --full-history -- "**op_eval*"
The result provided this as well as your commit linked.
In regards to the "Or perhaps".
I feel this would be the most appropriate solution for the brokens links as it was the entire merged implementation of the code changes, but isn't Gavin Andresen original 'implementation'.
Advantages to this method
Disadvantages to this method
Closing statement.
I would like to implement it as a link to Gavins implementation as to preserve the original BIP as much as possible.
If you would like to use the link to the OP_EVAL and merge into bitcoin/bitcoin I can do that as well. Please let me know which fix you would like and I will implement immediately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure there was a distinction between the "original" and the final version in this sense - BIPs typically get updated as the proposal changes.
But ultimately, it's a question of what @gavinandresen will ACK here.