Add BitNavPanel extra component (#9163) #9518
Conversation
…nk/bitframework into 9163-blazorui-extra-navpanel
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Blazor UI framework, focusing on renaming and refactoring components, introducing a new Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NavPanel
participant BitNav
participant SearchBox
User->>NavPanel: Open/Toggle Panel
NavPanel->>NavPanel: Update Open/Toggled State
User->>SearchBox: Enter Search Text
SearchBox->>NavPanel: Filter Navigation Items
NavPanel->>BitNav: Render Filtered Items
User->>BitNav: Click Navigation Item
BitNav->>User: Navigate to Selected Item
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (34)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/fabric.mdl2.bit.blazoui.extras.scss (1)
9-14: Enhance base icon class with additional propertiesConsider adding
vertical-alignto prevent alignment issues with surrounding text, and document the necessity of the!importantflag.Apply these improvements:
.bit-icon { font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; display: inline-block; + vertical-align: middle; /* Prevents misalignment with text */ font-family: 'Fabric MDL2 bit BlazorUI Extras' !important; + /* Add a comment explaining why !important is necessary if it can't be removed */ }src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.scss (1)
31-31: Consider using a CSS variable for header heightThe hard-coded value
rem2(65px)could be moved to a CSS variable in_bit-css-variables.scssfor better maintainability and consistency across components.- min-height: rem2(65px); + min-height: var(--bit-header-height, rem2(65px));src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/PopularComponents.razor.scss (2)
61-61: Consider browser compatibility for user-select property.The removal of vendor prefixes for user-select might affect older browsers. Consider using PostCSS Autoprefixer to automatically handle vendor prefixes.
158-159: Use color variables instead of hardcoded values.Consider replacing the hardcoded color
#c8c6c4with a variable from _colors.scss for consistency. Also, the use of!importantsuggests specificity issues that should be resolved through proper CSS specificity.- background-color: #c8c6c4 !important; - border: rem2(4px) solid #c8c6c4 !important; + background-color: $bit-color-background-scrollbar; + border: rem2(4px) solid $bit-color-background-scrollbar;src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Extensions/StringExtensions.cs (2)
Line range hint
5-8: Minor Improvement: Use the Negation Operator for ClarityCurrently, the code uses
string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value) is falseandstring.IsNullOrEmpty(value) is false. While functionally correct, it is slightly unconventional. Consider using the logical negation (!) for easier readability:return ignoreWhiteSpace - ? string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value) is false - : string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) is false; + ? !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value) + : !string.IsNullOrEmpty(value);
Line range hint
10-13: Consider Consolidating Methods for Maintainability
HasValueandHasNoValueare inverses of each other. To reduce possible duplication, you could either:
- Implement
HasNoValueas!HasValue(...), or- Implement both using a single private method that checks emptiness/whitespace and reuses it in the two public methods.
This approach can simplify future changes by managing the core logic in one place.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor (2)
11-15: Main content styling
Encapsulating@Bodyin a<Main>section is more semantically meaningful. Verify responsiveness by testing various viewports.
22-22: Placement of MessageBox
Consider whether<MessageBox />should remain outside the<BitLayout>component or if it would benefit from consistent styling within it.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.razor.cs (1)
57-59: Use of CSS classes
Definingbit-lyt-shdandbit-lyt-sftis intuitive. Consider standardizing naming for future expansions.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/JsInterop/BitExtrasJsRuntimeExtensions.cs (1)
1-9: Extension method for applying root classes
A straightforward approach to unify JS interop calls for CSS. Consider checking for null or empty arguments to prevent runtime errors.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Scripts/BitExtras.ts (1)
1-8: Refactor static-only class
To satisfy lint rules and keep the code simpler, consider convertingBitExtrasinto standalone functions rather than a static-only class.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 2-7: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor.cs (1)
13-13: Conditional initialization of_showExceptionin debug mode.Consider offering a way to control this flag in production (e.g., via configuration) if you foresee debugging or partial logs in non-DEBUG builds.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutClassStyles.cs (1)
23-23: Rename docstring reference to “nav-panel” to match the new property name.Currently, the summary still mentions “nav-menu,” which is outdated. Update the comment to align with “NavPanel.”
- /// Custom CSS classes/styles for the nav-menu section of the BitLayout. + /// Custom CSS classes/styles for the nav-panel section of the BitLayout.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Services/BitExtraServices.cs (1)
5-33: Offer dynamic extensibility for future custom CSS variables
Currently,var cssVariables = new Dictionary<string, string>();is always empty. Consider supporting external callers that want to pass in dynamic CSS variables for theming.src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor (2)
14-21: Basic example: potential duplication in code snippet references.Both examples reference the same
@example1RazorCodeand@example1CsharpCode. Consider separating them into distinct snippet references (e.g.,@example1…and@example2…) for clearer documentation if you plan to show different Razor/C# code in each example.
23-30: RTL example: code structure repeated.Repeating the same snippet reference for both Basic and RTL demos might cause confusion when displaying the source code. If these demos differ slightly, separate code references for each example can improve maintainability.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppFooter.razor (1)
Line range hint
to3-46: Switched from: semantic consideration.While changing from a
<footer>element to a<div>is valid HTML,<footer>is semantically meaningful for accessibility and SEO. If it’s intentional, this is fine; otherwise, consider reverting to a semantic<footer>tag.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/LinqExtensions.cs (1)
6-25: Add argument validation and cycle protection.
TheFlattenmethod does not handle null inputs or potential circular references. Consider adding explicit checks for nullsourceandchildPropertySelector, and ensure the code is robust against cyclical structures that could lead to infinite recursion.public static IEnumerable<T> Flatten<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, IEnumerable<T>> childPropertySelector) { + if (source is null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source)); + if (childPropertySelector is null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(childPropertySelector)); return source .Flatten((itemBeingFlattened, objectsBeingFlattened) => childPropertySelector(itemBeingFlattened)); }src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor.cs (2)
40-90: Hierarchical items for NavPanel are well-structured.
The navigation items clearly show a parent-child relationship. If deeper hierarchies are expected, consider using the newFlattenextension method to consolidate repeated logic.
93-97: Demo snippets are placeholders.
Sinceexample1RazorCodeandexample1CsharpCodeare empty strings, confirm the content is to be added later. This helps new contributors understand the usage examples.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor (3)
14-18: Toggle class usage.
(isToggled ? "bit-npn-tgl" : "")is appended to the core CSS. Ensure that any custom toggled styles are consistent to avoid layout shifts if the user toggles quickly.
20-48: Header fallback and toggling.
The logic ensures there’s either a custom header or a default fallback. This is good for flexibility. Make sure the toggle button is discoverable for screen readers (e.g., aria-label).
50-57: Search box for filtering nav items.
TheImmediate DebounceTime="500"approach helps performance. Extras like clearing the search or indicating the number of matched results might improve usability.src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/AppShell/BitAppShellDemo.razor.cs (2)
85-85: Updated description for 'Root' to ensure clarity.Describes the
Rootarea ofBitAppShellmore precisely. This fosters clearer guidelines for future maintainers.
99-99: Refined 'Center' description.Renaming references the top-center region accurately. Check for consistent usage across documentation.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor.cs (4)
13-17:Classesparameter for custom CSS.Facilitates fine-grained styling. Ensure merges with parent classes do not unexpectedly override styles.
50-53:Itemsis the main data source.Using
IList<TItem>is flexible for typical use cases. Consider immutability if concurrency is a risk.
106-110:OnInitializedAsynccallsSearchNavItems(null)to reset state.Ensures an initial unfiltered list. Consider if this is the best place or if
OnParametersSetAsyncis more appropriate.
143-161:SearchNavItemsfunction filters items based on partial text match.Splitting the search text by spaces improves relevance for multi-word queries. Validate performance for large lists.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutDemo.razor.cs (2)
107-107: SubClass 'NavPanel' references 'nav-menu' incorrectly in description.Consider updating the description to match the renamed parameter for consistency.
197-197:<BitToggle Label="Hide NavPanel" @bind-Value="HideNavPanel" />usage.Works well for toggling the panel. Consider verifying accessibility labeling.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor.scss (3)
13-27: Consider adding max-width media queries for larger screens.The
.page-containerhas good responsive design for smaller screens, but might benefit from additional max-width adjustments for ultra-wide displays..page-container { width: 100%; padding: 2rem; margin: 0 auto; max-width: rem2(1200px); + + @include xl { + max-width: rem2(1400px); + } + + @include xxl { + max-width: rem2(1600px); + } @include md { padding: 1.5rem; }
77-115: Consolidate scrollbar styles for better maintainability.The scrollbar styles are duplicated across different selectors. Consider extracting common styles into a mixin.
+@mixin custom-scrollbar { + &::-webkit-scrollbar { + width: rem2(8px); + } + + &::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { + border-radius: rem2(8px); + border: rem2(4px) solid #c8c6c4; + + &:hover { + border: rem2(4px) solid $B3Color; + } + } + + &::-webkit-scrollbar-button { + display: none; + } +} pre { margin: 0; width: 100%; // ... other styles ... - &::-webkit-scrollbar { - width: rem2(8px); - } - // ... remove other scrollbar styles ... + @include custom-scrollbar; }
132-155: Consider accessibility improvements for code box.The
.code-boximplementation looks good, but could benefit from accessibility enhancements..code-box { width: 100%; display: flex; padding: 1rem; overflow-x: auto; user-select: text; white-space: nowrap; align-items: center; margin: rem2(16px) 0; box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-user-select: text; justify-content: flex-start; background-color: $bit-color-background-secondary; border-left: rem2(4px) solid $bit-color-border-secondary; font-family: ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, SF Mono, Menlo, Consolas, Liberation Mono, monospace; + role: "region"; + aria-label: "Code example"; + tabindex: "0"; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/wwwroot/fonts/FabMDL2.4.66.bit.BlazorUI.Extras.woff2is excluded by!**/*.woff2
📒 Files selected for processing (51)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.razor.cs(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.scss(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShellClassStyles.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanelClassStyles.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/IServiceCollectionExtensions.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/JsInterop/BitExtrasJsRuntimeExtensions.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/LinqExtensions.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Scripts/BitExtras.ts(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Services/BitExtraServices.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/components.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/fabric.mdl2.bit.blazoui.extras.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.razor.cs(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.scss(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutClassStyles.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/BitNav.razor.cs(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Extensions/StringExtensions.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Server/Components/App.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/AppShell/BitAppShellDemo.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/AppShell/BitAppShellDemo.razor.cs(4 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutDemo.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutDemo.razor.cs(8 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/ComponentsSection.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/HeroSection.razor.scss(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/PopularComponents.razor.scss(6 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Routes.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Routes.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppFooter.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppFooter.razor.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.scss(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor.cs(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor.scss(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.cs(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.scss(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Styles/abstracts/_vars.scss(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Styles/app.scss(0 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/compilerconfig.json(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Maui/wwwroot/index.html(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Styles/app.scss
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.scss
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.cs
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/HeroSection.razor.scss
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Styles/abstracts/_vars.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShellClassStyles.cs
- src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Server/Components/App.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Scripts/BitExtras.ts
[error] 2-7: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
🔇 Additional comments (129)
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.scss (2)
Line range hint 5-143: Overall structure looks good!
The SCSS implementation demonstrates:
- Clean organization and logical grouping
- Proper use of responsive design patterns
- Good use of modern CSS features
- Appropriate use of mixins and variables
1-3: Verify variable dependencies after _vars.scss removal
The removal of _vars.scss import might affect variable references. Let's verify that all required variables are properly sourced from the remaining imports.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of _vars.scss is safe - all variables are properly sourced
Based on the inspection of AppHeader.razor.scss and the available imports, the removal of _vars.scss is safe because:
- All variables used in the file are prefixed with
$bit-(e.g.,$bit-box-shadow-1,$bit-color-primary,$bit-color-foreground-secondary) - These variables are properly defined in the imported
_bit-css-variables.scssfile - The only other SCSS functions used (
rem2()) are provided by the imported_functions.scss
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to variables that might have been defined in _vars.scss
rg -l '\$(?!bit-)' --type scss src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/
# Check the content of remaining scss files to understand variable definitions
fd -e scss . src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Styles/abstracts/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 11249
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the AppHeader.razor.scss content to see what variables it uses
cat src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.scss
# Also check if there are any non-bit prefixed variables in use
rg --pcre2 '\$(?!bit-)[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+' src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.scss
Length of output: 2931
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/PopularComponents.razor.scss (1)
34-34: Verify the fixed top position across different viewport sizes.
The top position has been simplified to a fixed value. Please ensure this doesn't affect the component's positioning across different screen sizes and device orientations.
Run the following script to check for any responsive layout dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Fixed top position is appropriate for sticky positioning
The top: rem2(70px) is used in conjunction with position: sticky for the .sample-side class. This is a valid use case as:
- The value is consistent with other
rem2(70px)usages across the codebase for similar layout elements - Sticky positioning typically requires a fixed offset from the viewport, so a static value is appropriate
- No media queries are modifying this value, indicating it's meant to be consistent across viewports
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related responsive layout adjustments
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' --no-heading 'rem2\(70px\)'
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' --no-heading '.sample-side.*top:'
Length of output: 1152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for media queries and responsive styles in the PopularComponents.razor.scss
rg -g '*.scss' -A 5 '@media' 'src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/PopularComponents.razor.scss'
# Search for the class containing top: rem2(70px) to understand its context
rg -g '*.scss' -B 5 -A 5 'top: rem2\(70px\)' 'src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/PopularComponents.razor.scss'
Length of output: 408
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Extensions/StringExtensions.cs (2)
1-1: Enablement of Nullable Reference Types Looks Good
The addition of #nullable enable properly aligns with modern C# standards for improved type-safety, ensuring that potential null references are handled more explicitly throughout the extension methods in this file.
2-2: Namespace Organization is Reasonable
The namespace Bit.BlazorUI is consistent with the rest of the project’s structure, promoting logical grouping of UI-related extensions and components.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppHeader.razor.cs (1)
5-5: Ensure references are updated following the rename to AppHeader.
Renaming the class from Header to AppHeader is consistent with the PR’s overall component renaming strategy. Verify that all references to the old class name are updated throughout the solution—particularly in .razor markup and services that might still reference Header.
Here’s a script to help confirm that no references to Header remain:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any references to the renamed component to ensure we have a complete picture.
Let me search for any references to the component in .razor files since the previous search didn't handle them correctly.
Let me search for any references to the component in the MainLayout file to verify its usage.
Let me check the actual AppHeader component usage in the MainLayout and other layout files.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The rename from Header to AppHeader is safe and properly referenced
The component AppHeader is correctly used in the main layout file and there are no remaining references to the old Header class name in other components. The rename appears to be consistent with the codebase structure where:
- The component is used as
<AppHeader />within the<Header>section of theBitLayoutcomponent in the main layout. - No other components are directly referencing the old class name
Header. - Other occurrences of "Header" in the codebase are unrelated (like HTML headers, template parameters, etc.).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any references to the old class name "Header" across the codebase.
rg -A 5 $'class Header'
Length of output: 1267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to both "Header" and "AppHeader" in .razor files
rg -t razor "Header"
# Search for any remaining references to the old class name in C# files
rg -t cs "Header" --glob "!*.razor.cs"
Length of output: 66326
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to both "Header" and "AppHeader" in .razor files
fd -e razor -x cat {} \; | rg -i "header"
# Also search for any references to the component in MainLayout or other layout files
fd "MainLayout|Layout" -e razor -x cat {} \;
Length of output: 59637
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the component usage in MainLayout and any references to it
fd -e razor -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 "AppHeader|<Header"
# Also check for any .razor files that might be using the old Header name
fd -e razor -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 "<Header\s+/>"
Length of output: 11572
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the AppHeader component usage in layout files
fd "MainLayout|Layout" -e razor -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 "AppHeader"
# Also check for any references to the old Header name in .razor files
fd -e razor -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 "class Header"
Length of output: 277
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor (5)
3-4: Use the new layout parameters effectively
Switching to BitLayout with HideNavPanel and StickyHeader is a solid, streamlined approach that improves layout management.
5-7: Header segment is consistent
Using <Header> to wrap <AppHeader /> clearly separates the layout structure.
8-10: Ensure 'Top' offset aligns with header sizing
With Top="65", confirm that the AppHeader and any potential status bars remain properly aligned.
16-19: Footer integration
Wrapping <AppFooter /> with <Footer> is consistent with the new layout pattern and keeps things modular.
20-20: Closing BitAppShell
The overall usage of <BitAppShell> here is correct and aligns with the new layout convention.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.razor.cs (5)
21-23: New HideNavPanel property
A clear parameter name to control nav visibility. Looks good for quickly toggling navigation.
26-28: Logical partitioning
Using Main to capture the central content zone helps maintain clarity in the layout structure.
31-33: NavPanel parameter
Replacing the old NavMenu with a more descriptive NavPanel improves component clarity. Verify all references for consistency.
36-38: StickyFooter introduction
Great improvement over manually fixed footers. This parameter-based approach is more flexible.
41-43: StickyHeader usage
Enabling a sticky header at the framework level simplifies page-level styling. Nicely done.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Routes.razor.cs (2)
5-5: AutoInject of BitExtraServices
Relying on BitExtraServices centralizes device styling logic. This keeps Routes clean and focused.
9-9: Await root CSS configuration
Ensuring bitExtraServices.AddRootCssClasses() completes before the layout renders can prevent layout flashes. Double-check error handling.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Routes.razor (1)
1-17: Great use of <AppErrorBoundary> to wrap application routes.
Wrapping the entire routing structure in an error boundary is a clean solution for catching and handling UI errors. This approach improves overall robustness and maintainability.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor.cs (2)
5-5: Private field _showException is introduced.
The new private field _showException streamlines the component's internal state management versus a public property.
7-7: Auto-injected dependencies are properly declared.
Using [AutoInject] with _exceptionHandler and _navigationManager is consistent with the codebase's approach.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/IServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (2)
19-19: Singleton registration of BitExtraServices.
Registering BitExtraServices as a singleton alongside BitModalService is consistent with the pattern used for stateless services or those that do not rely on per-request data.
24-24: Scoped registration of BitExtraServices.
Ensure that BitExtraServices behavior remains correct when registered as scoped, especially if it relies on a shared state that is consistent throughout the entire client app session. If it requires session-wide data yet not truly per-request, consider clarifying the scenarios in which it should be scoped vs. singleton.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Services/BitExtraServices.cs (2)
1-2: Adopt consistent namespace patterns and structure
This file starts with an inline namespace, which is good practice in modern C#. Ensure it is consistently applied across the new code in this project.
3-4: Constructors with parameter property
You’ve used the C# 10 record-style constructor (public class BitExtraServices(IJSRuntime js)). This is a concise pattern. Just confirm that your minimal constructor logic does not require advanced validation or other logic.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/AppShell/BitAppShell.razor.cs (4)
3-3: Confirm references to renamed class
Renaming the layout class to BitAppShell is a breaking change if existing code references the old name. Verify that all references to the old BitProLayout are gone or updated.
18-18: Name alignment
Renaming the parameter to BitAppShellClassStyles? Classes aligns with the new class name. Great job keeping naming consistent.
23-23: Similar usage for “Styles”
Ensure that no references remain to the old Styles type and that usage in .razor or .scss files is properly updated.
27-27: Root element class naming
Using "bit-ash" as the root class is consistent with the new naming. Confirm all style references in the .scss or .css files match.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor (5)
7-9: Render dynamic error content conditionally
The new check else if (ErrorContent is not null) ensures dynamic error content is used first if present. This is clean and clear.
13-16: Structured layout for error display
Wrapping the error display in <main> and <BitStack> improves semantics and layout consistency. Nice improvement.
17-19: Use of BitText
Using <BitText> to show the heading is consistent with the project’s design system. Good approach for consistency.
21-23: Toggle full exception details
Showing the exception details when _showException is true is helpful. Ensure _showException is never inadvertently toggled in production builds if that’s undesired.
28-29: Clean button grouping
Displaying “Refresh,” “Home,” and “Recover” in a horizontal stack is a neat UI layout. Confirm each handler is implemented and tested.
Also applies to: 30-31, 32-32
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.razor (4)
13-16: Inline styles for the header
You’re directly binding @Styles?.Header and @Classes?.Header. This is simpler and reduces local variable usage. Keep an eye on ensuring consistent theming across the project.
18-19: Inline main area styling
Applying @Styles?.Main and @Classes?.Main helps unify styling with the rest of the layout. Great consistency so far.
21-22: NavPanel integration
Replacing the old NavMenu references with NavPanel ensures alignment with the new component. Confirm that HideNavPanel logic is working as expected.
33-33: Inline footer binding
The inline approach for Footer styling is consistent, reducing overhead from extra style variables. This is a neat change.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/AppShell/BitAppShellDemo.razor (4)
1-1: Route updated successfully.
The route change from “/components/prolayout” to “/components/appshell” looks correct and is consistent with the renaming effort from ProLayout to AppShell.
5-7: PageOutlet properties updated.
The Url, Title, and Description attributes have been updated to “AppShell”. Ensure that any references or links to the old route are updated throughout the docs and code to avoid broken links.
9-10: Component name consistency.
Renaming “ProLayout” to “AppShell” aligns with the rest of the refactoring. The updated description is consistent and clear. No issues found.
19-21: External references are correct.
The external links to AdminPanel and Todo samples properly illustrate usage of BitAppShell. Confirm these sample sites are functional and reflect the new naming changes.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor (3)
1-1: New page route introduced.
The addition of “/components/navpanel” is clear. Confirm that the navigation menus or other references in the app also reflect this route if needed.
5-7: PageOutlet properties for NavPanel.
The Url, Title, and Description for the NavPanel page are set correctly. This accurately describes the new component.
9-10: ComponentDemo introduction looks good.
The high-level description and usage notes for BitNavPanel are clear. No issues found.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanelClassStyles.cs (2)
1-1: Namespace alignment.
Using Bit.BlazorUI namespace is consistent with the rest of the Extras library. No issues here.
3-54: Class-based style configuration is appropriate.
All style properties are nullable and documented with XML comments. This gives sufficient flexibility for consumers to override individual sections of the NavPanel. No major concerns found.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/LinqExtensions.cs (2)
1-2: Consider namespace alignment and consistency.
The namespace Bit.BlazorUI is consistent with the rest of the project, but verify this file’s placement and the namespace alignment with surrounding files to maintain clarity for future maintainers.
27-49: Ensure child selection is valid and avoid duplication.
While this overload allows using both the current item and the full source, there's no built-in check to prevent duplicates if multiple items' children point to the same subset. If this is not intended, consider adding a filtering or lookup mechanism.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutDemo.razor (4)
29-33: Naming convention aligns with PR objective.
Renaming the example title from "NavMenu" to "NavPanel" clarifies intent. This matches the new component’s name, ensuring consistency across the UI.
34-40: Confirm property usage after renaming.
The HideNavPanel property is introduced to replace HideNavMenu. Double-check all references in the codebase to ensure the property name is updated consistently.
58-58: NavPanel class usage.
The NavPanel = "nav-menu2" class name might set expectations from earlier code. Confirm that associated styles and references remain valid in the new design.
62-62: Consistent naming for NavPanel element.
Replacing <NavMenu> with <NavPanel> is a key part of the new navigation structure. Confirm that referencing code (e.g., child components or style classes) has also been revised to avoid confusion.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/NavPanel/BitNavPanelDemo.razor.cs (3)
6-16: Parameter definitions are clear.
The componentParameters list defines self-contained metadata for rendering or documentation. This approach promotes consistent usage across demos.
17-34: Check consistency between SubClass definitions and usage.
pdf-reader-config might be unrelated to NavPanel content. Verify if this is intentional or if references to PDF functionality are leftover from another feature.
38-40: Visibility states for nav panels.
basicIsOpen and rtlIsOpen boolean fields appear to control open state. Ensure the code handles toggling these states properly in the .razor file (e.g., click events or data binding).
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor (2)
5-9: Overlay close logic.
Clicking on the overlay calls CloseMenu; confirm that method exists and is accessible in the component’s code-behind. Also consider accessibility: some users might prefer a close button or ESC key support.
95-101: Footer flexibility.
The optional Footer region is a convenient extension point. Confirm you’ve tested scenarios where the footer is omitted to ensure no layout issues arise.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/AppShell/BitAppShellDemo.razor.cs (10)
1-1: Namespace refactor aligns with 'AppShell' naming convention.
This namespace change follows the updated component naming strategy, ensuring consistency, clarity, and discoverability in the codebase.
3-3: Class name update confirms shift from 'ProLayout' to 'AppShell'.
Renaming the class to BitAppShellDemo helps unify naming sync across the codebase. Ensure all external references have also been updated.
26-26: Switched Classes parameter to BitAppShellClassStyles.
This updated type is consistent with the new naming strategy. Confirm all references in Razor and C# files have been replaced accordingly.
35-35: Switched Styles parameter to BitAppShellClassStyles.
Matching approach used for Classes. Double-check styling logic to confirm no leftover references to old BitProLayoutClassStyles.
77-77: Subclass title renamed to 'BitAppShellClassStyles'.
The new title clarifies the content's purpose and aligns with the changed component name.
92-92: Updated description for 'Top' segment.
Properly designates the top portion of the BitAppShell. Reviews on real usage contexts recommended.
106-106: Refined 'Left' description.
Aligns naming for the top-left region with the new BitAppShell structure.
113-113: Refined 'Main' description.
Focused explanation clarifies the main content area.
120-120: Refined 'Right' description.
Precisely identifies the right region. Consistent with other layout segments.
127-127: Refined 'Bottom' description.
Sets clear expectations for the bottom location. The re-labeled parameter names simpler for developers to adopt.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor.cs (29)
1-1: Namespace for NavPanel established.
This new namespace is consistent with other components in the Bit.BlazorUI library.
3-3: Generic constraint enforces class type for items.
where TItem : class is a good pattern, preventing unexpected types and ensuring reference semantics for the nav items.
5-5: Disposed pattern recognized via _disposed.
Tracking disposal ensures safe resource cleanup.
6-6: Private BitNav reference.
Provides internal access to the main nav functionality. Make sure null checks or lazy initialization are used if needed.
7-7: Filtering approach uses _filteredNavItems.
Stores a filtered subset of items for searching. Confirm consistent updates across toggling scenarios.
8-8: Search box reference stored.
Allows focusing and controlling search behavior. Consider lazy reference assignment to avoid potential null references.
9-9: _flatNavItemList for unrolled nav structure.
Flattening hierarchies ensures easier searching and matching.
18-21: EmptyListMessage clarifies search results.
Providing a user-friendly fallback message is essential for good UX.
23-26: Footer parameter for flexible layout.
Enables end-developer to override or inject custom markup.
28-31: Header parameter for flexible top segment.
Similar approach as Footer, fosters easy extension.
33-36: IconUrl for custom branding.
Lightweight method to support an icon or logo.
38-42: Two-way bound IsOpen property.
Use with caution; confirm that toggling logic is well-tested to avoid unintended side effects.
44-49: Two-way bound IsToggled.
Similar to IsOpen. If both manipulate a single visible panel state, confirm there's no conflicting behavior.
55-58: NavClasses management.
Allows specialized styling for the nested BitNav component.
60-63: NavStyles for inlined styling.
Mirrors the usage pattern for NavClasses. Good approach for theming or dynamic styling.
65-68: SearchBoxClasses handles subcomponent styling.
Retains encapsulation of styling details for more robust theming.
70-73: SearchBoxStyles for inline override.
Matches the established styling approach in the rest of the code.
75-78: Styles property for container-level styling.
Ensures consistent approach to styling across all subcomponent areas.
80-83: Togglable parameter allows collapsing.
The toggling approach is beneficial for adaptive UIs. Evaluate if collisions might occur with IsOpen.
85-88: Top parameter sets offset.
This is helpful for layering or partially offscreen nav usage. Check for negative values or overflow scenarios.
92-92: RootElementClass sets the base class to 'bit-npn'.
Keeps styling consistent with naming conventions.
94-99: CSS class registration includes Classes?.Root.
Applies user-defined CSS classes and the built-in "bit-npn-cls" when IsOpen is false. Good approach for dynamic styling.
100-105: CSS style registration with Styles?.Root.
Calculates top offset and adjusts available height. Confirm this calculation matches desired page layout in all breakpoints.
111-119: HandleNavItemClick resets _filteredNavItems and closes menu.
Good practice for preserving consistent UI state. Confirm any side effects are minimal.
120-124: CloseMenu sets IsOpen to false.
Hides the nav panel on item click or outside interactions. Use consistent naming in the markup to avoid confusion if it's toggling or closing.
125-133: ToggleNavPanel manages toggled state.
Uses a two-step approach: toggling IsToggled and resetting search. Check if IsOpen usage might conflict with IsToggled.
135-141: ToggleForSearch closes toggle and focuses search box.
User-friendly approach for quickly jumping to the search input.
164-169: Implements IDisposable to clean up references.
Ensures deterministic disposal. Confirm that any event or delegate unsubscribes are handled if present.
170-176: Dispose(bool) sets _disposed flag.
Fully consistent with the standard pattern.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayoutDemo.razor.cs (8)
32-35: Parameter rename from 'HideNavMenu' to 'HideNavPanel' clarifies intent.
Checks if the user is aware that existing calls to HideNavMenu must be updated.
46-49: Parameter rename from 'NavMenu' to 'NavPanel' clarifies usage.
Aligns with new naming approach. Confirm code references, doc, and UI are in sync.
59-73: Added StickyFooter and StickyHeader parameters.
Replaces fixed layout approach. Helps support layout responsiveness. Thoroughly test across different browsers.
132-132: New private field HideNavPanel.
Matches the new parameter name. Confirm no shadowing or confusion with the property.
199-205: Updated <BitLayout HideNavPanel="HideNavPanel"> markup.
Renders the <NavPanel> code block inside layout. Improves clarity.
214-214: New field private bool HideNavPanel needed for data binding.
Matches the usage in <BitToggle>. Thoroughly tested for reactivity.
265-265: Pass CSS class 'nav-menu2' to NavPanel.
Shows how theming is carried forward. Verify naming is consistent with HideNavPanel references.
269-269: <NavPanel>NavPanel</NavPanel> usage.
Demonstrates newly renamed parameter in example. Documentation is consistent.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor.cs (4)
8-8: Introduced _isHomePage field.
Tracks homepage logic for layout conditions. Good for toggling UI elements.
11-175: Added _navItems for dynamic navigation.
Defining nav items in code centralizes navigation config. Consider referencing them from an external data source if expanding.
180-180: Reinserted IPrerenderStateService reference.
Still used for SSR or pre-render scenarios. Confirm no conflicts if the service is also declared in other files.
218-219: Refined SetCurrentUrl to define _isHomePage.
Compares the relative path to "/", removing CurrentUrl property. Verify edge cases for trailing slashes or query params.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/ComponentsSection.razor (2)
247-249: Add “AppShell” to Extras section successfully
The code introduces a link to the new AppShell component. This looks good and matches the naming conventions used elsewhere in the codebase.
256-258: Add “NavPanel” to Extras section successfully
The new NavPanel link is properly styled and placed within the Extras section. It helps discoverability for the newly introduced navigation component.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/BitNav.razor.cs (2)
97-97: Documentation comment corrected
Great job updating the parameter description to clarify that multiple items are displayed. This improves readability for API consumers.
339-359: New internal method “GetData”
This method neatly abstracts the logic for retrieving item data. The fallback usage of NameSelectors is well-structured.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppErrorBoundary.razor.scss (3)
1-1: Minimal import usage
Retaining only the import for _bit-css-variables.scss helps keep SCSS overhead low while preserving established design tokens.
3-6: Ensuring full-height main section
Using height: 100% on the main element can improve layout consistency. The background color reference to $bit-color-background-primary is appropriate to align with the updated theme variables.
10-14: Refined “.exception” styling
The new dimensions and text-align: start property improve readability for error content. This is a good approach for presenting exception details.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/components.scss (3)
1-1: New import: BitAppShell.scss
Bringing in the new AppShell styles is consistent with the renamed component, replacing the older ProLayout references.
2-2: Retained import for DataGrid
Keeping the DataGrid stylesheet ensures all data grid features remain styled properly.
4-4: Add import for NavPanel
Importing BitNavPanel.scss aligns the new navigation panel’s styles with the rest of the application’s component styles.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Layouts/Layout/BitLayout.scss (3)
18-26: LGTM: Sticky header implementation looks good
The sticky header implementation with z-index: $zindex-base provides better scrolling behavior compared to the previous fixed positioning approach.
28-36: LGTM: Sticky footer implementation looks good
The sticky footer implementation mirrors the header's approach, maintaining consistency in the layout system.
55-55: LGTM: Added horizontal scrolling support
The addition of overflow-x: auto ensures content remains accessible when it exceeds the container width.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.scss (2)
12-36: LGTM: Responsive mobile implementation with smooth transitions
The mobile implementation includes:
- Proper z-index layering
- Smooth transitions for transform and opacity
- RTL support with directional transforms
65-77: Verify overlay behavior on different screen sizes
The overlay implementation looks good, but let's verify its behavior across different viewport sizes and devices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me also check for any overlay-related styles:
And let's check for any media query implementations to ensure consistent responsive behavior:
Let me also check if there are any SCSS variables defined for z-index:
Let me also check for any overlay-related class definitions:
And let me check for the specific file content:
The overlay implementation is consistent with the codebase's z-index system
The verification shows that:
- The NavPanel overlay uses
$zindex-overlaywhich is part of a well-defined z-index hierarchy in the codebase - The z-index variables are properly defined and follow a consistent pattern:
$zindex-snackbar: var(--bit-zin-snackbar); $zindex-modal: var(--bit-zin-modal); $zindex-callout: var(--bit-zin-callout); $zindex-overlay: var(--bit-zin-overlay); $zindex-base: var(--bit-zin-base);
- The responsive behavior is correctly implemented using the
@include gt-smmixin to hide the overlay on larger screens - The overlay's positioning and dimensions (inset: 0, width/height: 100%) ensure it covers the entire viewport as expected
The implementation aligns with the codebase's standards and will work correctly across different viewport sizes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other overlay implementations to ensure consistent z-index usage
rg "z-index.*overlay" --type scss
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index related styles and overlay implementations
rg "z-index" -g "*.{css,scss,sass}"
Length of output: 65781
Script:
#!/bin/bash
rg "overlay|modal" -g "*.{css,scss,sass}"
Length of output: 131070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
rg "@include gt-sm|@media" -g "*.{css,scss,sass}"
Length of output: 65825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
fd -e scss -e sass -e css -x cat {} | grep -E "(\$zindex|\$z-index)"
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SCSS files that might contain z-index variables
fd -e scss -x cat {} | grep -A 2 -B 2 "\$z"
Length of output: 5090
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for overlay class definitions
fd -e scss -x cat {} | grep -A 5 "\..*overlay"
Length of output: 898
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific file content
cat src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.scss
Length of output: 1911
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/AppFooter.razor.scss (1)
5-12: LGTM: Improved footer styling with design system integration
Good changes:
- Using class selector improves reusability compared to ID
- Using design system variable
$bit-color-background-primarymaintains consistency
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/MainLayout.razor.scss (1)
6-11: LGTM: Main layout structure is well-defined.
The .site-content class provides a clean base structure with appropriate background color and margin.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Maui/wwwroot/index.html (1)
22-22: Verify the stylesheet loading order.
The bit.blazorui.extras.css is correctly placed before other component-specific stylesheets, but after the base styles.
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/compilerconfig.json (2)
50-55: LGTM: BitAppShellDemo configuration is properly structured.
The configuration for the new BitAppShellDemo component follows the established pattern with consistent options.
507-526: Verify component renaming consistency.
The shared component configurations have been updated to reflect the new naming convention (App prefix). Ensure this naming is consistent across the entire codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of these files to verify the component naming consistency.
Let me check if there are any inconsistencies in the naming by looking for the non-prefixed versions of these components.
Component naming is consistent with the new convention
Based on the verification results, the components are being used consistently with the "App" prefix across the codebase:
AppErrorBoundaryis used in MainLayout files across different projectsAppHeaderandAppFooterare properly used in the BlazorUI demo project- No instances of non-prefixed versions (ErrorBoundary, Header, Footer) were found in .razor files
The component configurations in compilerconfig.json correctly reflect the actual usage in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify component naming consistency
rg -g "*.razor" -l "AppErrorBoundary|AppFooter|AppHeader"
Length of output: 673
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of MainLayout files and Routes files to see how these components are used
rg -g "*.razor" "AppErrorBoundary|AppFooter|AppHeader" -C 2
Length of output: 5377
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for non-prefixed versions of the components
rg -g "*.razor" "ErrorBoundary\.razor|Footer\.razor|Header\.razor" --files-with-matches
# Also check component declarations
ast-grep --pattern 'class ErrorBoundary : ComponentBase'
ast-grep --pattern 'class Footer : ComponentBase'
ast-grep --pattern 'class Header : ComponentBase'
Length of output: 600
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/fabric.mdl2.bit.blazoui.extras.scss
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/NavPanel/BitNavPanel.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
closes #9163
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BitNavPanelcomponent for interactive navigationBitAppShellto replaceBitProLayoutImprovements
AppErrorBoundaryChanges
NavMenutoNavPanelRefactoring