Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gha: update label #1254

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

gha: update label #1254

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

bjlittle
Copy link
Owner

@bjlittle bjlittle commented Dec 24, 2024

🚀 Pull Request

Description

This pull-request updates the ci-label GHA to migrate from nep-29 to spec-0.


@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: gha Auto-labelled label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@tkoyama010 tkoyama010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.41%. Comparing base (e12fe00) to head (c3a52aa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1254   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.41%   91.41%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        2959     2959           
=======================================
  Hits         2705     2705           
  Misses        254      254           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bjlittle bjlittle merged commit cae49db into main Dec 24, 2024
22 checks passed
@bjlittle bjlittle deleted the update-label-gha branch December 24, 2024 02:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: gha Auto-labelled
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants