-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Refactorings for Rust 1.59 #1867
Conversation
Remove Array suffix from TypedArrayName variants
Test262 conformance changesVM implementation
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1867 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.26% 47.48% -8.78%
==========================================
Files 201 201
Lines 17940 16407 -1533
==========================================
- Hits 10094 7791 -2303
- Misses 7846 8616 +770
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Benchmark for b664aa5Click to view benchmark
|
Benchmark for 1a7a4d7Click to view benchmark
|
@RageKnify I'm guessing the codecov job fails because the coverage reduction is so big? But the coverage difference doesn't make much sense to me. There should not really be a difference right? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like the idea of renaming the typed arrays. We use the spec names in order to easier see the direct relationship. The rest looks good.
Discussed in PR and Discord
Benchmark for 9901f3cClick to view benchmark
|
bors r+ |
This Pull Request fixes new lint errors and warnings introduced in rust 1.59 Each commit describes its changse. Co-authored-by: raskad <32105367+raskad@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
This Pull Request fixes new lint errors and warnings introduced in rust 1.59
Each commit describes its changse.