-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Rewrite some patterns with let-else and ok_or_else #2404
Conversation
Test262 conformance changes
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2404 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 38.80% 38.85% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 313 313
Lines 23897 23846 -51
==========================================
- Hits 9274 9265 -9
+ Misses 14623 14581 -42
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice code clean-up! Thanks!
bors r+ |
This Pull Request updates the codebase to the newest version of rustc (1.65.0). It changes the following: - Bumps `rust-version` to 1.65.0. - Rewrites some snippets to use the new let else, ok_or_else and some other utils. - Removes the `rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples` allow lint from our codebase. (Context: rust-lang/rust#101732)
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
This Pull Request updates the codebase to the newest version of rustc (1.65.0).
It changes the following:
rust-version
to 1.65.0.rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples
allow lint from our codebase. (Context: Feature gate therustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples
lint rust-lang/rust#101732)