-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #224 from AngelDeBenji/Uni-Gov-Update-W27
Create Uni Update Week 27 2021 08-07-21.md
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
57 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
57 changes: 57 additions & 0 deletions
57
protocols/uniswap/resources/Gov Weekly/Update Week 27 2021 08-07-21.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | ||
# Governance Update | ||
|
||
## New Discussions | ||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link | | ||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:| | ||
| Temperature Check – Should the 0.1% or 0.15% fee tier be introduced | Parameters | [Discuss](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temperature-check-should-the-0-1-or-0-15-fee-tier-be-introduced/13031) | | ||
|
||
Summary: | ||
Discussion proposing indroduction of intermediary 0.1% (or 0.15%) fee tier per pair | ||
|
||
Date Created: Jun 17\ | ||
Last Active: Jul 1 | ||
|
||
## Ongoing Discussions | ||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link | | ||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:| | ||
| Consensus Check: Raise the proposal quorum threshold from 40M | Governance Strategy/ Parameters | [Discuss](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-raise-the-proposal-quorum-threshold-from-40m/13242) | | ||
|
||
Summary:\ | ||
Proposal to Raise the quorum threshold to 60M | ||
|
||
Update 1:\ | ||
This discussion is currently open to off-chain voting to gauge support as part of the Consensus Check stage. | ||
[VOTE HERE](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswap/proposal/QmPe3FKu44mtGKvKmBDxVGkV9256BCcTf7TZ4cfugYdqRn) | ||
|
||
Date Created: Jul 6\ | ||
Last Active: Jul 8 | ||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link | | ||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:| | ||
| Governance Proposal 005 - DeFi Education Fund | Strategy/Treasury | [Discuss](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-005-defi-education-fund/12963) | | ||
|
||
Summary:\ | ||
Reviewd discussion regarding whether Uni should fund a "Education Fund" - Previously called Political Defence of DeFi | ||
This discussion follows off of earlier [Consensus Check](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uni-should-fund-a-political-defense-organization-for-decentralized-finance-copy/12717) | ||
|
||
Update 1:\ | ||
[General consensus](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-005-defi-education-fund/12963/19) that although Education Fund/Political defense is a good idea there is a pressing need to address budget | ||
|
||
Date Created: Jun 12\ | ||
Last Active: Jul 08 | ||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link | | ||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:| | ||
| Consensus Check: Uniswap Funds Community-Enabled Analytics via Yield-Generating Investment Strategies | Treasury | [Discuss](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uniswap-funds-community-enabled-analytics-via-yield-generating-investment-strategies/13220) | | ||
|
||
Summary:\ | ||
Call for grant that provides liquidity via Uniswap liquidity pools, to generate yield that continuously funds free sophisticated analytics resources, as well as the education and onboarding of new analysts into the Uniswap ecosystem. | ||
|
||
Update 1:\ | ||
This discussion is currently open to off-chain voting to gauge support as part of the Consensus Check stage. | ||
[VOTE HERE](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswap/proposal/QmbVVJ57NFq9ipgt3YY9S1NyN5s5ziswgHSPWfXNvuzwgx) | ||
|
||
Date Created: Jul 4\ | ||
Last Active: Jul 5 |