Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use BUILD_TESTING as the default value for Beast_BUILD_TESTS. #2828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2024

Conversation

JohannesWilde
Copy link
Contributor

This is the variable most other boost libraries use for initial selection of whether to build their tests [or they default to OFF].

To me this makes usage as a third_party, where I don't necessarily want to run all tests with every build, more consistent.

This is the variable most other boost libraries use for initial selection of whether to build their tests [or they default to OFF].

To me this makes usage as a third_party, where I don't necessarily want to run all tests with every build, more consistent.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.03%. Comparing base (075db2f) to head (1fa295b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2828      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    93.06%   93.03%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          178      178              
  Lines        13687    13687              
===========================================
- Hits         12738    12734       -4     
- Misses         949      953       +4     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 075db2f...1fa295b. Read the comment docs.

@ashtum ashtum merged commit 4abb787 into boostorg:develop Feb 25, 2024
38 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants