Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating picard to 2.18.2 #4676

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2018
Merged

updating picard to 2.18.2 #4676

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2018

Conversation

lbergelson
Copy link
Member

upgrading picard dependency from 2.18.1 -> 2.18.2

this way we'll be on the latest release when we start doing MarkDuplicates tieout

upgrading picard dependency frome 2.18.1 -> 2.18.2
@jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator

👍 if the tests pass merge

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4676 into master will decrease coverage by 0.005%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             master     #4676       +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage     79.84%   79.835%   -0.005%     
+ Complexity    17330     17328        -2     
==============================================
  Files          1074      1074               
  Lines         62907     62907               
  Branches      10181     10181               
==============================================
- Hits          50225     50222        -3     
- Misses         8701      8704        +3     
  Partials       3981      3981
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...utils/smithwaterman/SmithWatermanIntelAligner.java 50% <0%> (-30%) 1% <0%> (-2%)

@lbergelson lbergelson merged commit 367324b into master Apr 18, 2018
@lbergelson lbergelson deleted the lb_update_picard_to_2.18.2 branch May 25, 2018 20:23
cwhelan pushed a commit to cwhelan/gatk-linked-reads that referenced this pull request May 25, 2018
upgrading picard dependency frome 2.18.1 -> 2.18.2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants