Add another test case for extension declarations #304
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
timostamm
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
kralicky
pushed a commit
to kralicky/protocompile
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
This makes sure that declarations are enforced, even when no declarations are present, as long as `verification` is explicitly set to `DECLARATION`. (cherry picked from commit 2179754)
kralicky
pushed a commit
to kralicky/protocompile
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2024
This makes sure that declarations are enforced, even when no declarations are present, as long as `verification` is explicitly set to `DECLARATION`. (cherry picked from commit 2179754)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes sure that declarations are enforced, even when no declarations are present, as long as
verificationis explicitly set toDECLARATION.(More context: #303 (comment))