Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for async/streams/futures to Rust generator #1082

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dicej
Copy link
Collaborator

@dicej dicej commented Nov 6, 2024

This adds support for generating bindings which use the Async ABI along with the stream, future, and
error-context
types.

By default, normal synchronous bindings are generated, but the user may opt-in to async bindings for all or some of the imported and/or exported functions in the target world and interfaces -- provided the default-enabled async feature is enabled.

In addition, we generate StreamPayload and/or FuturePayload trait implementations for any types appearing as the T in stream<T> or future<T> in the WIT files, respectively. That enables user code to call new_stream or new_future to create streams or futures with those payload types, then write to them, read from them, and/or pass the readable end as a parameter to a component import or return value of a component export.

Note that I've added new core::abi::Instruction enum variants to handle async lifting and lowering, but they're currently tailored to the Rust generator and will probably change somewhat as we add support for other languages.

This does not include any new tests; I'll add those in a follow-up commit.

This is ready for review, but I'll leave it in draft mode until the following are complete:

This adds support for generating bindings which use the [Async
ABI](https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/design/mvp/Async.md)
along with the [`stream`, `future`, and
`error-context`](WebAssembly/component-model#405) types.

By default, normal synchronous bindings are generated, but the user may opt-in
to async bindings for all or some of the imported and/or exported functions in
the target world and interfaces -- provided the default-enabled `async` feature
is enabled.

In addition, we generate `StreamPayload` and/or `FuturePayload` trait
implementations for any types appearing as the `T` in `stream<T>` or `future<T>`
in the WIT files, respectively.  That enables user code to call `new_stream` or
`new_future` to create `stream`s or `future`s with those payload types, then
write to them, read from them, and/or pass the readable end as a parameter to a
component import or return value of a component export.

Note that I've added new `core::abi::Instruction` enum variants to handle async
lifting and lowering, but they're currently tailored to the Rust generator and
will probably change somewhat as we add support for other languages.

This does not include any new tests; I'll add those in a follow-up commit.

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>

add `async: true` case to Rust `codegen_tests`

This ensures that all the codegen test WIT files produce compile-able bindings
with `async: true` (i.e. all imports lowered and all exports lifted using the
async ABI).  That revealed some issues involving resource methods and
constructors, as well as missing stub support, which I've resolved.

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>

add codegen tests for futures, streams, and error-contexts

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>

remove async_support::poll_future

It was both unsafe to use and intended only for testing (and not even good for
that, it turns out).

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>

add stream/future read/write cancellation support

Also, fix some issues with stream/future payload lifting/lowering which I
_thought_ I had already tested but actually hadn't.

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>

support callback-less (AKA stackful) async lifts

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <joel.dice@fermyon.com>
@dicej dicej marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 23:15
@dicej dicej requested a review from alexcrichton December 20, 2024 00:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant