Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use a better name for internal const #153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2023

Conversation

mavimo
Copy link
Member

@mavimo mavimo commented Oct 14, 2023

Changes

  • Rename internal constant name to better represent the value

@mavimo mavimo self-assigned this Oct 14, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c5abad0) 42.19% compared to head (1cba989) 42.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #153   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   42.19%   42.19%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         365      365           
=======================================
  Hits          154      154           
  Misses        210      210           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mavimo mavimo force-pushed the better-namning-for-internal-const branch from 3b84914 to 47ed770 Compare October 16, 2023 18:29
@mavimo mavimo enabled auto-merge (squash) November 5, 2023 13:07
@mavimo mavimo force-pushed the better-namning-for-internal-const branch from 47ed770 to 1cba989 Compare November 5, 2023 13:12
@mavimo mavimo merged commit 3250c15 into master Nov 5, 2023
5 checks passed
@mavimo mavimo deleted the better-namning-for-internal-const branch November 5, 2023 13:19
mavimo added a commit to Xinayder/caddy-ingress-controller that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants