-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 734
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistent determination of positional Argument when using context.Arguments versus context.Argument #4128
Comments
BTW, I have a commit across streams, but I'm working on some extra integration tests. I'm having trouble running the specific tests I want to run, and having trouble adding new ones. But if you can approve of this, it's a simple modification from FirstOrDefault to LastOrDefault. Here's my reasoning why we're going Last instead of First: if you type in --target=A --target=B, we use B as the target, not A. Therefore, to keep it consistent with other places in the application, we should make it always return the last value, that way the value can likewise be overwritten, by whatever process can overwrite it. While I say it's a "simple modification", I realize this is not a "trivial change" because it completely alters existing behavior for users of frosting who may be using the ArgumentAliases.Argument() function. |
…ment when using context.Arguments versus context.Argument
…ment when using context.Arguments versus context.Argument
Thanks for reporting this @EdLichtman. Returning the value of the last occurrence of the argument is the way to go. This will be fixed by #4136 |
@augustoproiete I also have a changelist that includes additional unit/build tests but couldn't get them running locally yet. Could you possibly vet the code for me and add it to yours before you merge in? |
@EdLichtman Sure. Point me to it or post a |
@augustoproiete I really appreciate that, even though you also did some work, you gave me the opportunity to get a contribution. It made me very happy! |
…ment when using context.Arguments versus context.Argument Co-authored-by: "C. Augusto Proiete" <augusto@proiete.com>
GH-4128: Fix Inconsistent determination of positional Argument when using context.Arguments versus context.Argument
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version v3.1.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your GitReleaseManager bot 📦🚀 |
Prerequisites
Cake runner
Cake Frosting
Cake version
3.0.0
Operating system
Windows
Operating system architecture
64-Bit
CI Server
No response
What are you seeing?
When I am running a task, and I have an IFrostingContext, I have 4 options to get an argument:
Since 2 and 3 require the user to do extra work, we'll disregard those, unless they're helpful or informational. So to compare 1 vs 4:
We need consistency, because there is an actual use-case for both. Sometimes I want to use ArgumentAliases.Argument so that I don't have to write in my own Error Message, and mess with the AnsiConsole in the same way that that function messes with it.
What is expected?
I would expect that when using:
ArgumentAliases.Argument(IFrostingContext, string)
and
ICakeContextExtensions.GetArgument(ICakeContext, string)
I would get the same result.
Steps to Reproduce
Create a task in which you pass in an argument. Then, try to retrieve the argument using the two methods described:
.\build.ps1 --required_single=0 --required_single=1
var foo = context.Argument("required_single");
var bar = context.Arguments.GetArgument("required_single");
See that foo is 0, and bar is 1.
Output log
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: