Skip to content

How to handle case when the country CAMARA implementation wants to be more restrictive than CAMARA defintion #312

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @bigludo7!
I think this is an interesting topic to discuss that may apply to more scenarios, for example more restrictive validations regarding phone number validations. But, at least for this one, I think it is easy to solve it with spec documentation.

If you are referring to the requirement of the idDocument as part of the match process, in v0.2 we have included guidelines on how to use it if it is relevant in the country: https://github.com/camaraproject/KnowYourCustomer/blob/main/code/API_definitions/kyc-match.yaml#L78
It is not required per se, only if the operator decides it.

On the other hand, if the issue here is that it makes no sense for the operator to allow the client to ev…

Replies: 2 comments 4 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@bigludo7
Comment options

@lbertz02
Comment options

@bigludo7
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@bigludo7
Comment options

Answer selected by bigludo7
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
4 participants