Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency jinja2 to v3.1.5 [security] #68

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 24, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jinja2 (changelog) ==3.1.4 -> ==3.1.5 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2024-56326

An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code.

To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates.

Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.

CVE-2024-56201

A bug in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker that controls both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, regardless of if Jinja's sandbox is used.

To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control both the filename and the contents of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename.


Release Notes

pallets/jinja (jinja2)

v3.1.5

Compare Source

Unreleased

  • Calling sync render for an async template uses asyncio.run.
    :pr:1952
  • Avoid unclosed auto_aiter warnings. :pr:1960
  • Return an aclose-able AsyncGenerator from
    Template.generate_async. :pr:1960
  • Avoid leaving root_render_func() unclosed in
    Template.generate_async. :pr:1960
  • Avoid leaving async generators unclosed in blocks, includes and extends.
    :pr:1960

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants