CIP-0017 | Adjust preamble and structure w.r.t CIP-0001

[rphair]

Fixes #661.

(edited proposal)

[rphair]

@KtorZ when we were originally reviewing this it seemed like this was on the threshold of implementation, especially since Adafolio was already half way there, and maybe that's why it was merged as Active without the evidence that we would demand today.

Based on our current standards I've demoted it to Proposed but if you known of anything that qualifies it as Active then please post & we'll have another look. I was also liberal about writing your Path to Active based on what we might expect along those lines & would be open to your suggestions or corrections.

[Ryun1]

LGTM

[KtorZ]

@KtorZ when we were originally reviewing this it seemed like this was on the threshold of implementation, especially since Adafolio was already half way there, and maybe that's why it was merged as Active without the evidence that we would demand today.

Indeed, that is odd. I've demoted it even further to Inactive since it hasn't really gained any traction and I am not aware of any work stream (and surely not leading any) to implement it and further refine it.

[rphair]

Still @KtorZ I think it'll be helpful as a point of reference since the idea of the JSON portfolio has come up in other arrangements (e.g #628) & will keep coming up. I've changed the status... does anything else need to be reconsidered?