forked from open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Separate semantic conventions from the specification. (open-telemetry…
- Loading branch information
1 parent
b1d602b
commit ac9610b
Showing
1 changed file
with
182 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ | ||
| # Separate Semantic Conventions | ||
|
|
||
| Move Semantic Conventions outside of the main Specifications and version them | ||
| separately. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Motivation | ||
|
|
||
| We need to allow semantic conventions to evolve mostly independent of the | ||
| overall OpenTelemetry specification. Today, any breaking change in a semantic | ||
| convention would require bumping the version number of the entirety of the | ||
| OpenTelemetry specification. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Explanation | ||
|
|
||
| A new GitHub repository called `semantic-conventions` would be created in the | ||
| OpenTelemetry organization. | ||
|
|
||
| This would *initially* have the following structure: | ||
|
|
||
| - Boilerplate files, e.g. `README.md`, `LICENSE`, `CODEOWNERS`, `CONTRIBUTING.md` | ||
| - `Makefile` that allows automatic generation of documentation from model. | ||
| - `semantic_conventions/` The set of YAML files that exist in | ||
| `{specification}/semantic_conventions` today. | ||
| - `docs/` A new directory that contains human readable documentation for how to | ||
| create instrumentation compliant with semantic conventions. | ||
| - `resource/` - Contents of `{specification}/resource/semantic_conventions` | ||
| - `trace/` - Contents of `{specification}/trace/semantic_conventions` | ||
| - `metrics/` - Contents of `{specification}/metrics/semantic_conventions` | ||
| - `logs/`- Contents of `{specification}/logs/semantic_conventions` | ||
| - `schemas/` - A new location for [Telemetry Schemas](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/schemas/README.md) | ||
| to live. This directory will be hosted at | ||
| `https://opentelemetry.io/schemas/` | ||
|
|
||
| Existing semantic conventions in the specification would be marked as | ||
| moved, with documentation denoting the move, but preserving previous contents. | ||
|
|
||
| Additionally, if the semantic conventions eventually move to domain-specific | ||
| directory structure (e.g. `docs/{domain}/README.md`, with trace, metrics, events | ||
| in the same file), then this can be refactored in the new repository, preserving | ||
| git history. | ||
|
|
||
| There will also be the following exceptions in the specification: | ||
|
|
||
| - Semantic conventions used to implement API/SDK details will be fully specified in the `opentelemetry-specification` repo | ||
| and will not be allowed to change in the Semantic Convention directory. | ||
| - Error/Exception handling will remain in the specification. | ||
| - SDK configuration interaction w/ semantic convention will remain in the | ||
| specification. Specifically `service.name`. | ||
| - The specification may elevate some semantic conventions as necessary for | ||
| compatibility requirements, e.g. `service.instance.id` and | ||
| [Prometheus Compatibility](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/compatibility/prometheus_and_openmetrics.md). | ||
|
|
||
| These exceptions exist because: | ||
|
|
||
| - Stable portions of the specification already rely on these conventions. | ||
| - These conventions are required to implement an SDK today. | ||
|
|
||
| As such, the Specification should define the absolute minimum of reserved or | ||
| required attribute names and their interaction with the SDK. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Internal details | ||
|
|
||
| The following process would be used to ensure semantic conventions are | ||
| seamlessly moved to their new location. This process lists steps in order: | ||
|
|
||
| - A moratorium will be placed on Semantic Convention PRs to the specififcation | ||
| repository. (Caveat that PRs related to this proposal would be allowed). | ||
| - Interactions between Semantic Conventions and the Specification will be | ||
| extracted such that the Specification can place requirements on Semantic | ||
| Conventions and *normative* specification language will remain in the | ||
| core specification directories. | ||
| - A new repository `open-telemetry/semantic-conventions` will be constructed with | ||
| the proposed format and necessary `Makefile` / tooling. | ||
| - The new repository would be created by using `git filter-branch` to preserve | ||
| all existing semantic convention history. *This means all existing | ||
| semantic conventions will be in the new repository*. | ||
| - GitHub Actions, `Makefile` tooling and contributing / readmes would be | ||
| updated for the separate repository. | ||
| - **Note: At this point, the new location for semantic conventions should | ||
| be adoptable/usable.** | ||
| - Semantic conventions in the Specification will be marked as moved with | ||
| links to the new location. | ||
| - The semconv YAML files in the specification repository *will be deleted*. | ||
| - All semconv markdown files will be updated such that: | ||
| - They no longer generate from YAML files. | ||
| - They include a header denoting deprecation and move to the new repository. | ||
| - Instrumentation authors will update their code generation to pull from the new | ||
| semconv repository instead of the specification repository. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Trade-offs and mitigations | ||
|
|
||
| This proposal has a few drawbacks: | ||
|
|
||
| - The semantic conventions will no longer be easily referenceable form the specification. | ||
| - This is actually a benefit. We can ensure isolation of convention from | ||
| specification and require the Specification to use firm language for | ||
| attributes it requires, like `service.name`. | ||
| - We will provide links from existing location to the new location. | ||
| - Semantic Convention version will no longer match the specification version. | ||
| - Instrumentation authors will need to consume a separate semantic-convention | ||
| bundle from Specification bundle. What used to be ONE upgrade effort will | ||
| now be split into two (hopefully smaller) efforts. | ||
| - We expect changes from Semantic Conventions and Specification to be | ||
| orthogonal, so this should not add significant wall-clock time. | ||
| - Existing PRs against semantic conventions will need to be regenerated. | ||
|
|
||
| Initially this repository would have the following ownership: | ||
|
|
||
| - Approvers | ||
| - [Christian Neumüller](https://github.com/Oberon00), Dynatrace | ||
| - [James Moessis](https://github.com/jamesmoessis), Atlassian | ||
| - [Joao Grassi](https://github.com/joaopgrassi), Dynatrace | ||
| - [Johannes Tax](https://github.com/pyohannes), Microsoft | ||
| - [Liudmila Molkova](https://github.com/lmolkova), Microsoft | ||
| - [Sean Marcinak](https://github.com/MovieStoreGuy), Atlassian | ||
| - [Ted Young](https://github.com/tedsuo), Lightstep | ||
| - Approvers (HTTP Only) | ||
| - [Trask Stalnaker](github.com/trask) | ||
| - Approvers (SchemaUrl Files) | ||
| - [Tigran Najaryan](github.com/tigrannajaryan) | ||
| - Maintainers | ||
| - [Josh Suereth](github.com/jsuereth) | ||
| - [Armin Ruech](github.com/arminru) | ||
| - [Reiley Yang](github.com/reyang) | ||
|
|
||
| That is, Maintenance would initially continue to fall on (a subset of) the | ||
| Technical Committee. Approvers would start with existing semconv approvers in | ||
| addition to targeted at HTTP semantic convention stability approvers and | ||
| expand rapidly as we build momentum on semantic conventions. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Prior art and alternatives | ||
|
|
||
| When we evaluate equivalent communities and efforts we see the following: | ||
|
|
||
| - `OpenTracing` - had specification and [semantics](https://github.com/opentracing/specification/blob/master/semantic_conventions.md) | ||
| merged. | ||
| - `OpenCensus` - had specification and semantics merged. However, OpenCensus | ||
| merged with OpenTelemetry prior to mass adoption or stable release of its | ||
| specification. | ||
| - `Elastic Common Schema` - the schema is its own project / document. | ||
| - `Prometheus` - Prometheus does not define rigid guidelines for telemetry, like | ||
| semantic conventions, instead relying on naming conventions and | ||
| standardization through mass adoption. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Open questions | ||
|
|
||
| This OTEP doesn't address the full needs of tooling and codegen that will be | ||
| needed for the community to shift to a separate semantic convention directory. | ||
| This will require each SIG that uses autogenerated semantic conventions to | ||
| adapt to the new location. | ||
|
|
||
| The first version of the new location for semantic conventions may not follow | ||
| the latest of the specification. There is reasoning to desire a `2.0` but the | ||
| details will be discussed in the new repository location upon execution of this | ||
| OTEP. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Future possibilities | ||
|
|
||
| This OTEP paves way for the following desirable features: | ||
|
|
||
| - Semantic Conventions can decide to bump major version numbers to accommodate | ||
| new signals or hard-to-resolve new domains without breaking the Specification | ||
| version number. | ||
| - Semantic Conventions can have dedicated maintainers and approvers. | ||
| - Semantic Conventions can restructure to better enable subject matter experts | ||
| (SMEs) to have approver/CODEOWNER status on relevant directories. | ||
| - Semantic Conventions can adopt semantic versioning for itself, helping clearly | ||
| denote breaking changes to users. | ||
|
|
||
| There is a desire to move semantic conventions to domain-specific directories | ||
| instead of signal-specific. This can occur after the separation of the repository | ||
| and will be proposed and discussed separately from this OTEP. | ||
|
|
||
| For example: | ||
|
|
||
| - `docs/` | ||
| - `signals/` - Conventions for metrics, traces + logs | ||
| - `http/` | ||
| - `db/` | ||
| - `messaging/` | ||
| - `client/` | ||
| - `resource/` - We still need resource-specific semantic conventions |