Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add 2 test cases from go to java #383

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

LMay001
Copy link
Contributor

@LMay001 LMay001 commented Feb 23, 2024

fix:add test case from go to java
include testDomainMatchModel,testAllMatchModel

@casbin-bot
Copy link
Member

@tangyang9464 @imp2002 please review

@hsluoyz hsluoyz changed the title fix:add test case from go to java fix: add 2 test cases from go to java Feb 23, 2024
@hsluoyz hsluoyz merged commit 76e97d7 into casbin:master Feb 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@LMay001 LMay001 deleted the modeltest branch February 23, 2024 12:01
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.49.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.21%. Comparing base (eb7f931) to head (9b908cd).
Report is 22 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #383   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.21%   69.21%           
=======================================
  Files          53       53           
  Lines        2378     2378           
  Branches      419      419           
=======================================
  Hits         1646     1646           
  Misses        624      624           
  Partials      108      108           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants