Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use build #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Use build #166

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member

This tries to move past deprecation of setup.py functionality.

References:

This tries to move past deprecation of setup.py functionality.

References:
* https://blog.ganssle.io/articles/2021/10/setup-py-deprecated.html#summary

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Aug 26, 2024
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member Author

I'm fine with this merging once it has passed CI.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 21:11
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team as a code owner August 26, 2024 21:11
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member Author

I also saw this page for further reference:

https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/setup-py-deprecated/

@kchason kchason merged commit 917ad51 into develop Aug 26, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@kchason kchason deleted the use_build branch August 26, 2024 22:53
ajnelson-nist added a commit to Cyber-Domain-Ontology/CDO-Utility-Local-UUID that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* casework/CASE-Utilities-Python#166

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants