Added a unit test that proves timeout is used when retry policy is specified

[thedrow]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.47%. Comparing base (6a77355) to head (82bf9ba).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.47%   81.47%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines        9500     9500           
  Branches     1148     1148           
=======================================
  Hits         7740     7740           
  Misses       1569     1569           
  Partials      191      191           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Nusnus]

Approved, but the my comment from the confirm publish PR also applies here.

The test doesn’t check the actual functionality. It only confirms the arguments are passed as expected.
In this case, adding the unit test is great, in opposition to the other PR, so the PR is easily approved. However, please note that a higher-level test is required to confirm that the timeout is actually respected as expected. This unit test is not trustworthy enough.

You will need to test the negative flows to confirm that it works, which means passing the timeout and testing that it behaves as expected, based on the timeout value.