Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Added comprehensive performance comparison for NER models #268

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Jun 3, 2023

Conversation

KennethEnevoldsen
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Looks like some formatting rules failed.

✨ The action has attempted automatic fixes ✨

If any were succesful, they were committed to the branch.
We suggest using git pull --rebase to apply them locally.

If some errors could not be fixed automatically, you can:

🏎️ Get results locally by running pre-commit run --all-files
🕵️ Examine the results in the Run pre-commit section of this workflow pre-commit

We also strongly recommend setting up the ruff and black extensions to auto-format on save in your chosen editor.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
16 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 11s ⏱️

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Test Results

16 tests   16 ✔️  1m 39s ⏱️
  1 suites    0 💤
  1 files      0

Results for commit 52fdca9.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen merged commit 3f5d3b0 into main Jun 3, 2023
@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen deleted the emils-changes branch June 3, 2023 01:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants