3-way channel cross in multisample

[koadman]

Currently there is an unimplemented feature in multisample which involves measuring the accuracy of the estimated strain relative abundance profiles in a timeseries. This requires bits of info from three previous workflow steps, which would necessitate a 3-way cross() of channels. Is this possible? Can it be done as two successive channel crosses?

[cerebis]

Hmm. A join on three channels should be possible. Not sure if I've made it
harder than it should be until we try!

On Tuesday, 18 October 2016, Aaron Darling notifications@github.com wrote:

Currently there is an unimplemented feature in multisample which involves
measuring the accuracy of the estimated strain relative abundance profiles
in a timeseries. This requires bits of info from three previous workflow
steps, which would necessitate a 3-way cross() of channels. Is this
possible? Can it be done as two successive channel crosses?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#51, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFuniwbcpzictLzk_0gNu8noYEw8s85uks5q07dGgaJpZM4KY6t9
.