Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: rewrite ecdsa section of user guide #9465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2022
Merged

docs: rewrite ecdsa section of user guide #9465

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

alexzorin
Copy link
Collaborator

At the time this section was written, it was all about the introduction of support for ECDSA and how users can start taking advantage of that support.

Now that we use ECDSA by default, this piece of documentation probably should serve a new purpose. My idea here is to document the new behavior that we have in 2.0: new key type on new certificates, old certificates will keep their existing key type.

Users may now be going in the reverse direction with their changes ("I got an ECDSA certificate but I need RSA because I have an old load balancer appliance!") so I have also updated some section titles to be less about ECDSA and more about Key Types in general.

Fixes #9442.


image


certbot renew --key-type ecdsa --cert-name example.com --force-renewal
which will take effect upon the next renewal of each certificate.

Obtaining ECDSA certificates in addition to RSA certificates
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am on the fence about whether this section is worth keeping in 2023. The dual RSA/ECDSA nginx setup is a very esoteric setup and has less and less reason to exist, in my opinion. We have other stuff which is undocumented (like --reuse-key) and deserves the space more. Keen to hear other opinions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should get rid of this section as I agree it's way too esoteric to it be worth space in our docs. If you want to create a PR to remove this section, I'd approve it.

Copy link
Member

@bmw bmw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. Thanks Alex.

@bmw bmw merged commit 371cc6f into master Nov 17, 2022
@bmw bmw deleted the docs-ecdsa-updates branch November 17, 2022 17:41
bmw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation updates for 2.0 release
2 participants