Complete the removal of Georgia

[nataliafitzgerald]

This pull request is related to these issues:

Remove Georgia from Design Manual
#499

Defining the use of Avenir Next vs. Georgia
#347 (comment)

In January of 2017 we decided that Avenir Next would be the default font site-wide. It appears that we may have started to move forward with this change but did not complete it. From what I can tell, we've stopped using Georgia for body copy on DM pages. But there are instances of images on the Typography page that still include Georgia. Georgia is also still included in the type hierarchy (although the supporting visual is in Avenir Next). This pull request aims to complete the removal of Georgia from the Design Manual (with the exception of some static images contained on the page that will need to be updated at a later date).

Additions

Removals

• All instances of Georgia in the HTML code

Changes

• Color names updated to current color palette naming system

Testing

Review

• @caheberer
• @ielerol

Preview this PR without the whitespace changes

Screenshots

Notes

Todos

Checklist

• Changes are limited to a single goal (no scope creep)
• Code can be automatically merged (no conflicts)
• Code follows the standards laid out in the front end playbook
• Passes all existing automated tests
• New functions include new tests
• New functions are documented (with a description, list of inputs, and expected output)
• Placeholder code is flagged
• Visually tested in supported browsers and devices
• Project documentation has been updated (including the "Unreleased" section of the CHANGELOG)

[caheberer]

Maybe we should be more specific about italics? Looking at our content guidelines, titles of publications are the only instance where italics should be used. I'm not certain, but it sounded like even that might be removed.

[nataliafitzgerald]

@caheberer
Good point. I actually don't know of any instances in our editorial guidelines where we specify that italics should be used. @kurzn - Can you consult?

[kurzn]

@nataliafitzgerald @caheberer yes that is an error in the guidelines re: publications. Working to have that fixed in the version that's circulating for approval.

[nataliafitzgerald]

Ok, sounds good. @caheberer - Can you take one more look at the latest commit and we can merge this?

[Scotchester]

Just to clarify: We're talking about our "publications", right? I would hope we'd still use italics to set off the titles of published works (books, movies, magazines, etc.), if we ever had a need to refer to them.

[kurzn]

@Scotchester Nope. AP doesn't use italics. Book titles are in quotation marks.

[Scotchester]

Ugh, AP. So good sometimes, so dumb other times.