-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
Request: Can we include unit testing skeletons with recipe generators? #152
Comments
+1 to @brandocorp's idea. Having just a basic unit test is helpful, On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:24 PM, brandocorp notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Knife-spec is good example to go off of |
I have opened #153 for this issue |
This was released in version 0.3.6 as part of #266 |
Refactor msi building logic into omnibus-ruby as a packager
I was thinking it might be useful to add the generation of unit test files for their associated cookbook files. If a person was to generate a recipe named 'foo', they would get the recipe file along with its associated spec file like so:
This would include modifying the
chef generate cookbook
command to add thespec/recipes
folder and adefault_spec.rb
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: